Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Cox, Eric Magar (1999)
How Much Is Majority Status in the U.S. Congress Worth?American Political Science Review, 93
Bruce W Jentleson, Rebecca L Britton (1998)
Still pretty prudent: post-cold war American public opinion on the use of military forceThe Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42
George Edwards, T. Swenson (1997)
Who Rallies? The Anatomy of a Rally EventThe Journal of Politics, 59
J. O'neal, Bradley Lian, James Joyner (1996)
Are the American People “Pretty Prudent”? Public Responses to U.S. Uses of Force, 1950–1988International Studies Quarterly, 40
(2006)
A divider, not a uniter
G. Koeske, W. Crano (1968)
The effect of congruous and incongruous source-statement combinations upon the judged credibility of a communication.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4
Bruce Jentleson, Rebecca Britton (1998)
POST-COLD WAR AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION ON THE USE OF MILITARY FORCE
(2007)
Democrats cancel Fox News debate
JN Druckman (2001)
On the limits of framing effectsThe Journal of Politics, 63
A. Eagly, W. Wood, S. Chaiken (1978)
Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion changeJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36
M. Baum, Tim Groeling (2007)
Crossing the Water's Edge: Elite Rhetoric, Media Coverage and the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon, 1979-2003John F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper Series
A. Kühberger (1998)
The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis.Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 75 1
(2006)
The Connecticut Democratic primary
(2006)
The Iraq war on cable TV
J. Kuklinski, N. Hurley (1994)
On Hearing and Interpreting Political Messages: A Cautionary Tale of Citizen Cue-TakingThe Journal of Politics, 56
A. Lupia, Mathew McCubbins (1998)
The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?
(2006)
Nationalizing ‘The Kiss’ (8/11/06)
Brandice Canes-Wrone (2005)
Who Leads Whom?: Presidents, Policy, and the Public
P Sniderman, R Brody, P Tetlock (1991)
Reasoning and choice: explorations in political psychology
Bruce Jentleson (1992)
The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military ForceInternational Studies Quarterly, 36
GC Edwards, T Swenson (1997)
Who rallies?The Journal of Politics, 59
V. Crawford, J. Sobel (1982)
STRATEGIC INFORMATION TRANSMISSIONEconometrica, 50
Michael Pfau (1989)
The Mass Media and American PoliticsPolitical Research Quarterly, 42
T. Windt (1991)
The Public Presidency
Wendy Rahn (1993)
The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political CandidatesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 37
Richard Herrmann, J. Voss, Tonya Schooler, J. Ciarrochi (1997)
Images in International Relations: An Experimental Test of Cognitive SchemataInternational Studies Quarterly, 41
J. Druckman (2001)
Using Credible Advice to Overcome Framing EffectsJournal of Law Economics & Organization, 17
G. Chandler (1998)
A National Security Strategy for a New Century
Richard Eichenberg (2005)
Victory Has Many Friends: U.S. Public Opinion and the Use of Military Force, 19812005International Security, 30
(2006)
Can Lieberman survive Iraq? Time, (June), 25
J. Druckman (2001)
On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?The Journal of Politics, 63
Iowa's top statesmen have low U.S. profile. The Des Moines Register, Online Edition
Trefor Morgan, Kenneth Bickers (1992)
Domestic Discontent and the External Use of ForceJournal of Conflict Resolution, 36
(2007)
Action: Freeze out Fox News
Thomas Nelson, J. Garst (2005)
Values‐based Political Messages and Persuasion: Relationships among Speaker, Recipient, and Evoked ValuesPolitical Psychology, 26
News interest/believability survey
T. Goertzel, R. Sobel (1996)
Public Opinion in U.S. Foreign Policy: The Controversy over Contra AidPolitical Psychology, 17
soldiers have been killed? To the best of your knowledge, has it been under 500, 500 to 1000
Tim Groeling, M. Baum (2008)
Crossing the Water's Edge: Elite Rhetoric, Media Coverage, and the Rally-Round-the-Flag PhenomenonThe Journal of Politics, 70
Jennifer Rauch (2006)
All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information Into NewsJournal of Communication Inquiry, 30
J. Hurwitz, M. Peffley (1987)
How are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical ModelAmerican Political Science Review, 81
A. George (1974)
Assessing Presidential CharacterWorld Politics, 26
(2001)
When politicians attack: The causes, contours, and consequences of partisan political
E. Goldman (2006)
Choosing Your Battles: American Civil–Military Relations and the Use of ForcePerspectives on Politics, 4
John Mueller (1973)
War, presidents, and public opinion
P. Everts, P. Isernia (2003)
Public Opinion and the International Use of Force
P. Feaver, Christopher Gelpi (2003)
Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-Military Relations and the Use of Force
(1993)
What have we learned about public opinion in U.S. foreign policy
S. Gartner, Gary Segura (2007)
Southern Political Science Association Race , Casualties , and Opinion in the Vietnam War
S Popkin (1994)
The reasoning voter
(1993)
Legislative leviathan
O. Holsti (1996)
Public opinion and American foreign policy
P. Sniderman, R. Brody, Phillip Tetlock (1991)
Reasoning and Choice: The principle–policy puzzle: the paradox of American racial attitudes
S. Kull, C. Ramsay (2001)
The Myth of the Reactive Public: American Public Attitudes on Military Fatalities in the Post Cold War Period
D. Rucinski (1994)
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.Psyccritiques, 39
Polit Behav
D Sears (1986)
College sophomores in the laboratoryJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31
M. Baum, Phil Gussin (2008)
In the Eye of the Beholder: How Information Shortcuts Shape Individual Perceptions of Bias in the MediaQuarterly Journal of Political Science, 3
SS Gartner, GM Segura (2000)
Race, casualties, and opinion in the Vietnam warThe Journal of Politics, 62
M. Nincic, Joseph Lepgold (2000)
Being Useful Policy Relevance and International Relations Theory
M. Baum (2002)
The Constituent Foundations of the Rally-Round-the-Flag PhenomenonInternational Studies Quarterly, 46
E. Walster, E. Aronson, D. Abrahams (1966)
On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicatorJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2
(2000)
Putting theory to work: Diagnosing public opinion on the US intervention
David Hubner (2006)
Addressing the Components of Will in the National Strategy for Victory in Iraq
Gary King, Michael Tomz, J. Wittenberg (2000)
Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and PresentationPSN: Computational Models (Games) (Topic)
Bruce Jentleson, Rebecca Britton (1998)
Still Pretty PrudentJournal of Conflict Resolution, 42
R. Calvert (1985)
The Value of Biased Information: A Rational Choice Model of Political AdviceThe Journal of Politics, 47
David Mayhew (1975)
Congress: The Electoral Connection
(1973)
Market signaling
Gaye Tuchman (1978)
Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality
J. Druckman (2006)
Who Leads Whom?: Presidents, Policy, and the Public, by Brandice Canes-Wrone: Public Opinion Quarterly
D. Sears (1986)
College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51
War stories: The causes and consequences of citizen views of War
Research has shown that messages of intra-party harmony tend to be ignored by the news media, while internal disputes, especially within the governing party, generally receive prominent coverage. We examine how messages of party conflict and cooperation affect public opinion regarding national security, as well as whether and how the reputations of media outlets matter. We develop a typology of partisan messages in the news, determining their likely effects based on the characteristics of the speaker, listener, news outlet, and message content. We hypothesize that criticism of a Republican president by his fellow partisan elites should be exceptionally damaging (especially on a conservative media outlet), while opposition party praise of the president should be the most helpful (especially on a liberal outlet). We test our hypotheses through an experiment and a national survey on attitudes regarding the Iraq War. The results show that credible communication (i.e., “costly” rhetoric harmful to a party) is more influential than “cheap talk” in moving public opinion. Ironically, news media outlets perceived as ideologically hostile can actually enhance the credibility of certain messages relative to “friendly” news sources.
Political Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 16, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.