Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Clark, A. Westerberg (1983)
Optimization for design problems having more than one objectiveComputers & Chemical Engineering, 7
Pei Liu, E. Pistikopoulos, Zheng Li (2009)
A mixed-integer optimization approach for polygeneration energy systems designComput. Chem. Eng., 33
Lin Gao, Hongguang Jin, Zelong Liu, D. Zheng (2004)
Exergy analysis of coal-based polygeneration system for power and chemical productionEnergy, 29
Sunggyu Lee (1989)
Methanol Synthesis Technology
Pei Liu, Dimitrios Gerogiorgis, E. Pistikopoulos (2007)
Modeling and optimization of polygeneration energy systemsCatalysis Today, 127
D. Aaron, C. Tsouris (2005)
Separation of CO2 from Flue Gas: A ReviewSeparation Science and Technology, 40
C. White, B. Strazisar, E. Granite, J. Hoffman, H. Pennline (2003)
Separation and Capture of CO2 from Large Stationary Sources and Sequestration in Geological Formations—Coalbeds and Deep Saline AquifersJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 53
A. Poullikkas (2005)
An overview of current and future sustainable gas turbine technologiesRenewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 9
R. Rosenthal (2004)
GAMS -- A User's Guide
Heather Fry, Steve Ketteridge, Stephanie Marshall (2003)
A user’s guide
Yohei Tanaka, T. Utaka, R. Kikuchi, K. Sasaki, K. Eguchi (2003)
Water gas shift reaction over Cu-based mixed oxides for CO removal from the reformed fuelsApplied Catalysis A-general, 242
Polygeneration, typically involving co‐production of methanol and electricity, is a promising energy conversion technology which provides opportunities for high energy utilization efficiency and low/zero emissions. The optimal design of such a complex, large‐scale and highly nonlinear process system poses significant challenges. In this article, we present a multiobjective optimization model for the optimal design of a methanol/electricity polygeneration plant. Economic and environmental criteria are simultaneously optimized over a superstructure capturing a number of possible combinations of technologies and types of equipment. Aggregated models are considered, including a detailed methanol synthesis step with chemical kinetics and phase equilibrium considerations. The resulting model is formulated as a non‐convex mixed‐integer nonlinear programming problem. Global optimization and parallel computation techniques are employed to generate an optimal Pareto frontier. © 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2010
Aiche Journal – Wiley
Published: May 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.