Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Linnell Linnell, Nilsen Nilsen, Lande Lande, Herfindal Herfindal, Odden Odden, Skogen Skogen, Andersen Andersen, Breitenmoser Breitenmoser (2005)
Zoning as a means of mitigating conflicts with large carnivores: principles and realityPeople and Wildlife, Conflict or Co-existence?
J. Odden, J. Linnell, R. Andersen (2006)
Diet of Eurasian lynx, Lynx lynx, in the boreal forest of southeastern Norway: the relative importance of livestock and hares at low roe deer densityEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research, 52
(2003)
Utredninger i forbindelse med ny rovvlitmelding. Status og forvaltning av brunbjørnen i Norge, NINA fagrapport 60. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim
R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood, A. Rabinowitz (2005)
People and Wildlife, Conflict or Co-existence?
Petter Wabakken, Åke Aronson, Håkon Sand, Ole Steinset, Ilpo Kojola (2002)
Ulv i Skandinavia - Statusrapport for vinteren 2001-2002
(2003)
Utredninger i forbindelse med ny rovviltmelding. Store rovdyrs innvirkning på hjorteviltet i Norge: Økologiske prosesser og konsekvenser for jaktuttak og jaktutøvelse, NINA fagrapport 63
J. Jaenike (1978)
Host Selection by Mycophagous DrosophilaEcology, 59
S Creel, G Spong, N Creel, JL Gittleman, SM Funk, DW Macdonald, RK Wayne (2001)
Interspecific competition and the population biology of extinction-prone carnivoresCarnivore Conservation
Ketil Skogen (2003)
Adapting Adaptive Management to a Cultural Understanding of Land Use ConflictsSociety & Natural Resources, 16
A. Landa, O. Strand, J. Swenson, T. Skogland (1997)
WOLVERINES AND THEIR PREY IN SOUTHERN NORWAYCanadian Journal of Zoology, 75
(2004)
Innstilling fra energi - og miljøkomiteen om rovvilt i norsk natur , Inst . S . nr . 174 ( 2003 – 2004 )
C. Nellemann, O. Støen, J. Kindberg, J. Swenson, I. Vistnes, G. Ericsson, Jonna Katajisto, B. Kaltenborn, Jodie Martin, A. Ordiz (2007)
Terrain use by an expanding brown bear population in relation to age, recreational resorts and human settlementsBiological Conservation, 138
Swenson Swenson, Andrén Andrén (2005)
A tale of two countries: large carnivore depredation and compensation schemes in Sweden and NorwayPeople and Wildlife. Conflict of Coexistence?
SW Buskirk, TW Clark, AP Curlee, SC Minta, PM Kareiva (1999)
Mesocarnivores of YellowstoneCarnivores in Ecosystems: The Yellowstone Experience
J. Linnell, O. Strand (2000)
Interference interactions, co‐existence and conservation of mammalian carnivoresDiversity and Distributions, 6
L. Mech (1995)
The challenge and opportunity of recovering wolf populationsConservation Biology, 9
C. Elton (1957)
Interspecific CompetitionNature, 180
J. Swenson, Henrik Andrén (2005)
People and Wildlife: A tale of two countries: large carnivore depredation and compensation schemes in Sweden and Norway
Valerie Kapos (2000)
UNEP-WCMC Web Site: Mountains and Mountain Forests, 20
B. Dahle, O. Sørensen, Egil Wedul, J. Swenson, F. Sandegren (1998)
The diet of brown bears Ursus arctos in central Scandinavia: effect of access to free-ranging domestic sheep Ovis ariesWildlife Biology, 4
J. Swenson, Petter Wabakken, F. Sandegren, A. Bjärvall, R. Franzén, A. Söderberg (1995)
The near extinction and recovery of brown bears in Scandinavia in relation to the bear management policies of Norway and SwedenWildlife Biology, 1
A. Landa, T. Skogland (1995)
The relationship between population density and body size of wolverines Gulo gulo in ScandinaviaWildlife Biology, 1
Dahle Dahle, Sørensen Sørensen, Wedul Wedul, Swenson Swenson, Sandegren Sandegren (1998)
The diet of brown bears in central Scandinavia: effects of access to free‐ranging domestic sheepWildlife Biology, 4
M. Boyce (2006)
Scale for resource selection functionsDiversity and Distributions, 12
J. Dijk, L. Gustavsen, A. Mysterud, R. May, Ø. Flagstad, H. Brøseth, R. Andersen, R. Andersen, H. Steen, A. Landa (2008)
Diet shift of a facultative scavenger, the wolverine, following recolonization of wolves.The Journal of animal ecology, 77 6
Petter Wabakken, Thomas Strømseth, Håkan Sand, Ilpo Kojola (2007)
Ulv i Skandinavia
B. Manly, L. McDonald, Dana Thomas (1994)
Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies.
Douglas Johnson (1980)
THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCEEcology, 61
M. Boyce, Pierre Vernier, S. Nielsen, F. Schmiegelow (2002)
Evaluating resource selection functionsEcological Modelling, 157
Henrik Brøseth, John Odden, John Linnell (2003)
Minimum antall familiegrupper, bestandsestimat og bestandsutvikling for gaupe i Norge i 2004
Petter Wabakken, H. Sand, O. Liberg, A. Bjärvall (2001)
The recovery, distribution, and population dynamics of wolves on the Scandinavian peninsula, 1978-1998Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79
(1999)
Spor og tegn. Et hefte til hjelp i bestemmelse av store rovdyr
M. Hansen, R. DeFries, J. Townshend, R. Sohlberg, C. DiMiceli, M. Carroll (2002)
Towards an operational MODIS continuous field of percent tree cover algorithm: examples using AVHRR and MODIS dataRemote Sensing of Environment, 83
(2001)
Changing landscapes: consequences for carnivores. Carnivore Conservation. Conservation Biology Series 5 (eds
J. Marzluff, J. Millspaugh, P. Hurvitz, M. Handcock (2004)
RELATING RESOURCES TO A PROBABILISTIC MEASURE OF SPACE USE: FOREST FRAGMENTS AND STELLER'S JAYSEcology, 85
J. Linnell, Erlend Nilsen, U. Lande, I. Herfindal, J. Odden, Ketil Skogen, R. Andersen, U. Breitenmoser (2005)
People and Wildlife: Zoning as a means of mitigating conflicts with large carnivores: principles and reality
R. Woodroffe, J. Ginsberg (1998)
Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areasScience, 280 5372
Henrik Andrén, J. Linnell, O. Liberg, Per Ahlqvist, R. Andersen, A. Danell, R. Franzén, T. Kvam, J. Odden, Peter Segerström (2002)
Estimating total lynx Lynx lynx population size from censuses of family groupsWildlife Biology, 8
J. Linnell, R. Andersen, Ž. Andersone, L. Balčiauskas, J. Blanco, L. Boitani, S. Brainerd, U. Breitenmoser, I. Kojola, O. Liberg, Jonny Loe, H. Okarma, H. Pedersen, H. Sand, E. Solberg, H. Valdmann, P. Wabakken (2002)
The fear of wolves: A review of wolf attacks on humans
J. Swenson, B. Dahle, H. Busk, Ole Opseth, T. Johansen, A. Söderberg, K. Wallin, G. Cederlund (2007)
Predation on Moose Calves by European Brown Bears, 71
K. Crooks (2002)
Relative Sensitivities of Mammalian Carnivores to Habitat FragmentationConservation Biology, 16
C. Wilmers, R. Crabtree, Douglas Smith, K. Murphy, W. Getz (2003)
Trophic facilitation by introduced top predators: grey wolf subsidies to scavengers in Yellowstone National ParkJournal of Animal Ecology, 72
M. Heithaus (2001)
Habitat selection by predators and prey in communities with asymmetrical intraguild predationOikos, 92
J. Milner, Erlend Nilsen, Petter Wabakken, T. Storaas (2005)
Hunting moose or keeping sheep? - Producing meat in areas with carnivores.Alces, 41
R. May, A. Landa, J. Dijk, J. Linnell, R. Andersen (2006)
Impact of infrastructure on habitat selection of wolverines Gulo gulo, 12
Sunquist Sunquist, Sunquist Sunquist (2001)
Changing landscapes: consequences for carnivoresCarnivore Conservation. Conservation Biology Series 5
(2001)
Flerarts- og soneforvaltning i rovdyr-saukonflikten. Utmarksbeite og store rovdyr. Delrapport 3 fra forskningsprogrammet Bruk og forvaltning av utmark (eds V
D. Otis, G. White (1999)
Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking dataJournal of Wildlife Management, 63
Wabakken Wabakken (2001)
Flerarts‐ og soneforvaltning i rovdyr‐saukonfliktenUtmarksbeite og store rovdyr. Delrapport 3 fra forskningsprogrammet Bruk og forvaltning av utmark
(2008)
Statistics for the radio-telemetry data and locations of predator-killed sheep This material is available as part of the online article
H. Sand, B. Zimmermann, Petter Wabakken, Henrik Andrén, H. Pedersen (2005)
Using GPS technology and GIS cluster analyses to estimate kill rates in wolf—ungulate ecosystems, 33
C. Carroll, R. Noss, P. Paquet (2001)
CARNIVORES AS FOCAL SPECIES FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGIONEcological Applications, 11
F. Palomares, T. Caro (1999)
Interspecific Killing among Mammalian CarnivoresThe American Naturalist, 153
(2008)
The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 British Ecological Society
R. Woodroffe (2000)
Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivoresAnimal Conservation, 3
(2001)
Delrapport 3 fra forskningsprogrammet Bruk og forvaltning av utmark
D. Hosmer, S. Lemeshow (1991)
Applied Logistic Regression
(2003)
Rovvilt i norsk natur, Stortingsmelding nr
D. MacNulty, N. Varley, Douglas Smith (2001)
Grizzly Bear, Ursus arctos, usurps Bison, Bison bison, captured by Wolves, Canis lupus, in Yellowstone National Park, WyomingCanadian Field-Naturalist, 115
Henrik Brøseth, Roy Andersen (2016)
Yngleregistreringer av jerv i Norge i 2003
(1999)
A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity
M. Hebblewhite, E. Merrill, T. Mcdonald (2005)
Spatial decomposition of predation risk using resource selection functions: an example in a wolf /elk predator /prey systemOikos, 111
J. Copeland, J. Peek, C. Groves, W. Melquist, K. McKelvey, Gregory Mcdaniel, C. Long, C. Harris (2007)
Seasonal Habitat Associations of the Wolverine in Central Idaho, 71
(2000)
Patch Analyst 2.2. Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research
(2003)
Brown bear – livestock conflicts in a bear conservation zone in Norway : are cattle a good alternative to sheep ?
Summary 1 The re‐establishment of large carnivores in Norway has led to increased conflicts and the adoption of regional zoning for these predators. When planning the future distribution of large carnivores, it is important to consider details of their potential habitat tolerances and strength of inter‐specific differentiation. We studied differentiation in habitat and kill sites within the large‐carnivore community of south‐eastern Norway. 2 We compared habitat selection of the brown bear Ursus arctos L., Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx L., wolf Canis lupus L. and wolverine Gulo gulo L., based on radio‐tracking data. Differences in kill site locations were explored using locations of documented predator‐killed sheep Ovis aries L. We modelled each species’ selection for, and differentiation in, habitat and kill sites on a landscape scale using resource selection functions and multinomial logistic regression. Based on projected probability of occurrence maps, we estimated continuous patches of habitat within the study area. 3 Although bears, lynx, wolves and wolverines had overlapping distributions, we found a clear differentiation for all four species in both habitat and kill sites. The presence of bears, wolves and lynx was generally associated with rugged, forested areas at lower elevations, whereas wolverines selected rugged terrain at higher elevations. Some degree of sympatry was possible in over 40% of the study area, although only 1·5% could hold all four large carnivores together. 4 Synthesis and applications. A geographically differentiated management policy has been adopted in Norway, aimed at conserving viable populations of large carnivores while minimizing the potential for conflicts. Sympatry of all four carnivores will be most successful if regional zones are established of adequate size spanning an elevational gradient. High prey densities, low carnivore densities, low dietary overlap and scavenging opportunities have most probably led to reduced competitive exclusion. Although regional sympatry enhances the conservation of an intact guild of large carnivores, it may well increase conflict levels and resistance to carnivore conservation locally.
Journal of Applied Ecology – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.