Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1997)
Population viability analysis of Icelandic / Greenlandic Pink - footed Geese . Survey and monitoring report 65
(1990)
Red data birds in Britain. T & AD Poyser, London. BirdLife International
(1962)
The return of the Osprey
James Brown, A. Kodric‐Brown (1977)
Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on ExtinctionEcology, 58
Avery Avery, Gibbons Gibbons, Porter Porter, Tew Tew, Tucker Tucker, Williams Williams (1994)
Revising the British red data list for birds: the biological basis of U.K. conservation prioritiesIbis, 137
Carter Carter, Hunter Hunter, Pashley Pashley, Rosenberg Rosenberg (2000)
Setting conservation priorities for landbirds in the United States: the Partners in Flight approachAuk, 117
World Conservation Union) 2001a. Guidelines for assessing taxa with widely distributed or multiple populations against criterion A. IUCN Species Survival Commission
A. Benson (2000)
Rare breeding birds in the United Kingdom in 1998
World Conservation Union) 2001b. IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 3.1. IUCN
Ron Pulliam (1988)
Sources, Sinks, and Population RegulationThe American Naturalist, 132
Michael Carter, W. Hunter, D. Pashley, K. Rosenberg (2000)
Conservation Report: Setting Conservation Priorities for Landbirds in the United States: The Partners in Flight ApproachThe Auk, 117
I. Hanski, M. Gyllenberg (1993)
Two General Metapopulation Models and the Core-Satellite Species HypothesisThe American Naturalist, 142
B. Etheridge, R. Summers, R. Green (1997)
The effects of illegal killing and destruction of nests by humans on the population dynamics of the hen harrier Circus cyaneus in ScotlandJournal of Applied Ecology, 34
Joshua Ginsburg (2002)
The Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels
(2002)
The population status of birds in the United Kingdom , Channel Islands and Isle of Man
H. Possingham, S. Andelman, M. Burgman, R. Medellín, L. Master, D. Keith (2002)
Limits to the use of threatened species listsTrends in Ecology and Evolution, 17
Gibbons Gibbons, Avery Avery, Baillie Baillie, Gregory Gregory, Kirkby Kirkby, Porter Porter, Tucker Tucker, Williams Williams (1996)
Bird species of conservation concern in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man: revising the red data listRSPB Conservation Review, 10
(1997)
Population estimates of birds in Britain and in the United Kingdom
P. Dolman (1996)
Birds in Europe: Their conservation status
P. Donald, R. Fuller (1998)
Ornithological atlas data: a review of uses and limitationsBird Study, 45
J. Sharrock (1980)
The Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland
C. Wernham (2002)
The migration atlas : movements of the birds of Britain and Ireland
Gardenfors Gardenfors, Rodriguez Rodriguez, Hilton‐Taylor Hilton‐Taylor, Hyslop Hyslop, Mace Mace, Molur Molur, Poss Poss (1999)
Draft guidelines for the application of the IUCN red list criteria at national and regional levelsSpecies, 31–32
D. Simberloff (2001)
Threatened Birds of the World, 118
M. Ogilvie (2007)
Rare breeding birds in the United Kingdom in 1995
Abstract: The World Conservation Union (IUCN) has developed guidelines that enable the assessment of extinction risk at a regional scale. We used these guidelines to assess the extinction risk of birds in the United Kingdom for comparison with an existing assessment of conservation status. Sixty‐four species were categorized as regionally threatened, of which 12 were critically endangered. The categorizations of the 223 species assessed agreed broadly with those from the existing U.K. system, which considers more than extinction risk, thus giving a more complete assessment of conservation status. There was, however, a tendency for the IUCN process to give higher risk status to edge‐of‐range species (some of which are relatively recent colonists considered of comparatively low conservation concern) and low status to those that have declined substantially but remain common (such as many farmland birds, the focus of considerable conservation effort in the United Kingdom). The final red list depended heavily on the subjective decisions made during the assessment process. An alternative interpretation of the guidelines could have resulted in as many as 19 or as few as 6 species being listed as critically endangered. We recommend the revision of the IUCN guidelines to reduce this subjectivity, in particular with respect to the effect of extralimital populations on the likelihood of regional extinction, and hence the potential for variation in the manner of application between regional red‐list assessors. Preventing extinction does not have to be the principal driving force behind conservation action at a regional scale if the continuance of a species is safeguarded in other regions.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.