Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Spreitzer, Mark Kizilos, S. Nason (1997)
A Dimensional Analysis of the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Effectiveness Satisfaction, and StrainJournal of Management, 23
E.E Lawler
The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High‐Involvement Organization
G. Spreitzer (1995)
PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATIONAcademy of Management Journal, 38
Aneil Mishra, G. Spreitzer (1998)
Explaining How Survivors Respond to Downsizing: The Roles of Trust, Empowerment, Justice, and Work RedesignAcademy of Management Review, 23
G. Spreitzer (1996)
Social structural characteristics of psychological empowermentAcademy of Management Journal, 39
F. Shipper, Charles Manz (1992)
Employee self-management without formally designated teams: An alternative road to empowermentOrganizational Dynamics, 20
Marilyn Gist, T. Mitchell (1992)
Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and MalleabilityAcademy of Management Review, 17
Angela Chiles, T. Zorn (1995)
Empowerment in organizations: Employees’ perceptions of the influences on empowermentJournal of Applied Communication Research, 23
Larry Hatcher, Timothy Ross (1991)
From individual incentives to an organization-wide gainsharing plan: Effects on teamwork and product qualityQuality Engineering, 37
K. Weick (1988)
ENACTED SENSEMAKING IN CRISIS SITUATIONS[1]Journal of Management Studies, 25
Tiffany Keller, F. Dansereau (1995)
Leadership and Empowerment: A Social Exchange PerspectiveHuman Relations, 48
W. Randolph (1995)
Navigating the journey to empowermentOrganizational Dynamics, 23
J.R Hackman, G.R Oldham
Work Redesign
R. Ford, M. Fottler (1995)
Empowerment: A matter of degreeAcademy of Management Perspectives, 9
R. Johnson, Elizabeth Thurston (1997)
Achieving empowerment using the Empowerment Strategy GridLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 18
Alan Thorlakson, R. Murray (1996)
An Empirical Study of Empowerment in the WorkplaceGroup & Organization Management, 21
H.A Suzik
Transmission plant is winner with empowerment
S. Cohen, Gerald Ledford, G. Spreitzer (1996)
A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team EffectivenessHuman Relations, 49
E.L Deci
Intrinsic Motivation
Sally Klingel, Lyman Ketchum, E. Trist (1992)
All Teams are not Created Equal: How Employee Empowerment Really Works
X. Meng, R. Rosenthal, D. Rubin (1992)
Comparing correlated correlation coefficientsPsychological Bulletin, 111
Marylène Gagné, C. Sénécal, R. Koestner (1997)
Proximal Job Characteristics, Feelings of Empowerment, and Intrinsic Motivation: A Multidimensional ModelJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 27
J. Conger, R. Kanungo (1988)
The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and PracticeAcademy of Management Review, 13
G. Spreitzer (1992)
When organizations dare: The dynamics of individual empowerment in the workplace.
R. Franke (1992)
The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement OrganizationThe Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement Organization By LawlerEdward E.III, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1992—371 pages. $29.95Academy of Management Perspectives, 7
R. Quinn, G. Spreitzer (1997)
THE ROOD TO EMPOWERMENT: SEVEN QUESTION EVERY LEADER SHOULD CONSIDER, 26
W. Griggs, S. Manring (1991)
The Bottom Line of Empowerment
A. Wilkinson (1998)
Empowerment: theory and practicePersonnel Review, 27
D. Ulrich (1996)
From The Ground Up: Six Principles for Building the New Logic Corporation
W. Byham, J. Cox (1988)
Zapp!: The lightning of empowerment : how to improve productivity, quality, and employee satisfaction
A. Bandura (1989)
Human agency in social cognitive theory.The American psychologist, 44 9
G. Parker (1994)
Cross Functional Teams: Working with Allies, Enemies, and Other Strangers
M. Fulford, C. Enz (1995)
The Impact of Empowerment on Service EmployeesJournal of Managerial Issues, 7
K.W Thomas, B.A Velthouse
Cognitive elements of empowerment
This paper examines the relationships between four contextual factors related to empowerment (communication with supervisor, general relations with company, teamwork, and concern for performance) and the four components of psychological empowerment (meaning, impact, self‐determination, and competence) identified by Spreitzer and her colleagues. We surveyed 203 employees of a manufacturing firm, using new and established measures of contextual factors and Spreitzer’s measures of empowerment components. The contextual factors were found to be differentially associated with the elements of psychological empowerment. Communication with supervisor and general relations with company were significantly related to the empowerment facets of meaning, self‐determination, and impact, but were not related to the facet of competence. Teamwork was related to meaning and impact. Concern for performance was related to meaning and self‐determination. These associations also varied by type of job. We conclude with implications for research and practice.
Personnel Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 2000
Keywords: Empowerment; Employee communications; Supervision; Performance; Teamwork
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.