Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Hoffman, T. Novak (1996)
Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual FoundationsJournal of Marketing, 60
J.L. Zaichkowsky
Conceptualizing involvement
Általános tudományok (2010)
Diffusion of Innovations
Don Charlett, R. Garland, N. Marr (1995)
How Damaging is Negative Word of Mouth
C. Dellarocas
The digitization of word‐of‐mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms
Marsha Richins (1983)
Negative Word-of-Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers: A Pilot StudyJournal of Marketing, 47
T. Hennig-Thurau, K. Gwinner, G. Walsh, Dwayne Gremler (2004)
Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18
Andrew Gershoff, Ashesh Mukherjee, A. Mukhopadhyay (2003)
Consumer Acceptance of Online Agent Advice: Extremity and Positivity Effects
E.T. Higgins
The ‘Communication game’: implication for social cognition and persuasion
R. East, Kathy Hammond, Malcolm Wright (2007)
The relative incidence of positive and negative word of mouth: A multi-category studyInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 24
John Hogan, Katherine Lemon, B. Libai (2004)
Quantifying the Ripple: Word-of-Mouth and Advertising EffectivenessJournal of Advertising Research, 44
James Anderson, D. Gerbing (1988)
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACHPsychological Bulletin, 103
D. Godes, Dina Mayzlin (2004)
Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth CommunicationMarketing Science, 23
Chrysanthos Dellarocas (2004)
MIT Sloan School of Management
A. De Bruyn, G.L. Lilien
A multi‐stage model of word‐of‐mouth through electronic referrals
L. Scheuermann, G. Taylor
Netiquette
R. Cathcart, G. Gumpert (1986)
I am a camera: The mediated selfCommunication Quarterly, 34
W.J. McGuire
Attitude change: the information‐processing approach
G. Lau, S. Ng (2009)
Individual and Situational Factors Influencing Negative Word‐of‐Mouth BehaviourCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration, 18
Soo Rieh (2002)
Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the WebJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 53
J. Arndt (1967)
Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New ProductJournal of Marketing Research, 4
J. Phelps, R. Lewis, Lynne Mobilio, David Perry, N.Kalyana Raman (2004)
Viral Marketing or Electronic Word-of-Mouth Advertising: Examining Consumer Responses and Motivations to Pass Along EmailJournal of Advertising Research, 44
E.K. Strong
The Psychology of Selling
J. Arndt
Selective processes in word‐of‐mouth
J. Chevalier, Dina Mayzlin (2006)
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book ReviewsJournal of Marketing Research, 43
L. Feick, Linda Price (1987)
The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information.Journal of Marketing, 51
G. Hofstede (1993)
Cultural constraints in management theoriesAcademy of Management Perspectives, 7
Ananda Mitra, Eric Watts (2002)
Theorizing Cyberspace: the Idea of Voice Applied to the Internet DiscourseNew Media & Society, 4
C. Derbaix, J. Vanhamme (2003)
Inducing word-of-mouth by eliciting surprise ? a pilot investigationJournal of Economic Psychology, 24
Eyal Biyalogorsky, Eitan Gerstner, B. Libai (2000)
Customer Referral Management: Optimal Reward ProgramsMarketing Science, 20
Wesley Hartmann, Puneet Manchanda, Harikesh Nair, M. Bothner, P. Dodds, D. Godes, K. Hosanagar, Catherine Tucker (2008)
Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implicationsMarketing Letters, 19
H. Bansal, Peter Voyer (2000)
Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Services Purchase Decision ContextJournal of Service Research, 3
P. Herr, Frank Kardes, John Kim (1991)
Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity PerspectiveJournal of Consumer Research, 17
Edward Mcquarrie, J. Munson (1992)
A Revised Product Involvement Inventory: Improved Usability and ValidityACR North American Advances
T. Olney, M. Holbrook, R. Batra (1991)
Consumer Responses to Advertising: The Effects of Ad Content, Emotions, and Attitude toward the Ad on Viewing TimeJournal of Consumer Research, 17
Dina Mayzlin (2006)
Promotional Chat on the InternetMarketing Science, 25
Barbara Bickart, R. Schindler (2001)
Internet forums as influential sources of consumer informationJournal of Interactive Marketing, 15
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo, D. Schumann (1983)
Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of InvolvementJournal of Consumer Research, 10
Jonathan Frenzen, Kent Nakamoto (1993)
Structure, Cooperation, and the Flow of Market InformationJournal of Consumer Research, 20
G. Zinkhan, Hyokjin Kwak, Michelle Morrison, C. Peters (2003)
Web‐Based Chatting: Consumer Communication in CyberspaceJournal of Consumer Psychology, 13
M. Weenig, C. Midden (1991)
Communication Network Influences on Information Diffusion and PersuasionJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61
P. Verlegh, Sarit Moldovan (2008)
What Drives Word of Mouth: A Multi-Disciplinary PerspectiveAdvances in Consumer Research, 35
Ann Schlosser, T. White, S. Lloyd (2006)
Converting Web Site Visitors into Buyers: How Web Site Investment Increases Consumer Trusting Beliefs and Online Purchase IntentionsJournal of Marketing, 70
A. Greimas (1971)
Narrative Grammar: Units and LevelsMln, 86
Purpose – This paper seeks to explore factors that can help generate a bigger ripple for diffusive Word‐of‐Mouth (WOM) in an online environment. Specifically, the paper aims to demonstrate how the characteristics of WOM information influence the ripple effect. Design/methodology/approach – The paper used a survey based on real posts in online discussion forums to collect the data. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was utilized for analysis. Findings – WOM as diffusive communication could generate a ripple effect. All of the WOM characteristics, which were investigated (quality, authority, authenticity and interestingness), have a positive effect on resenders' acceptance toward WOM, which, in turn, have a significant positive impact on resenders' resending intention. Furthermore, the positive impacts of WOM characteristics on resenders' acceptance exist, regardless of whether the valence of WOM information is positive or negative. Research limitations/implications – This study provides insights into the role of WOM information in facilitating the WOM ripple effect. However, the specific characteristics of WOM information that influence consumers' perceptions of WOM are not explored in the present research. Originality/value – The results of the study may help practitioners manipulate and use online WOM information in order to make marketing communications more efficient and influential.
European Journal of Marketing – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 26, 2011
Keywords: Word of mouth; Diffusive communication; Online environments; Information characteristics; Internet marketing; Marketing communications
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.