Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. McGuire, R. Staelin (2008)
An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical IntegrationMark. Sci., 27
ChenYuxin, D. HessJames, T. WilcoxRonald, Z. John (1999)
Accounting Profits Versus Marketing ProfitsMarketing Science
Joshua Wright (2006)
Antitrust Analysis of Category Management: Conwood v United States Tobacco CoSupreme Court Economic Review, 17
S. Choi (1991)
Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common RetailerMarketing Science, 10
Judy Corstjens, M. Corstjens (1995)
Store Wars: The Battle for Mindspace and Shelfspace
M. Corstjens, P. Doyle (1983)
A Dynamic Model for Strategically Allocating Retail SpaceJournal of the Operational Research Society, 34
Therefore, for all φ < φ CS , the consumers are better off under RCM and for all φ > φ CS , the consumers are better off under category captainship
(2003)
A Second Look at Category Management. Federal Trade Commision Report
Betul Lus, A. Muriel (2009)
Measuring the Impact of Increased Product Substitution on Pricing and Capacity Decisions Under Linear Demand ModelsProduction and Operations Management, 18
Chen (1999)
Accounting profits versus marketing profitsA relevant metric for category management, 18
Suman Basuroy, M. Mantrala, R. Walters (2001)
The Impact of Category Management on Retailer Prices and Performance: Theory and EvidenceJournal of Marketing, 65
Yuxin Chen, Ronald Wilcox, John Zhang, Leonard Stern (1999)
Accounting Profits Versus Marketing Profits: A Relevant Metric for Category ManagementMarketing Science, 18
Basuroy (2001)
The impact of category management on retailer prices and performanceTheory and evidence, 65
J. Quelch, David Kenny (1994)
Extend Profits, Not Product LinesJournal of Product Innovation Management, 3
Quelch Quelch, Kenny Kenny (1994)
Extend profits, not the product linesHarv. Bus. Rev., 72
(2002)
Dancing with the 800-pound Gorilla
R. Steiner (2001)
Category Management - A Pervasive New Vertical/Horizontal Format
(2004)
Category Management is Here to Stay
(2003)
UST Must Pay $ 1.05 Billion To a Big Tobacco Competitor
G. Martín-Herrán, S. Taboubi, G. Zaccour (2006)
The Impact of Manufacturers' Wholesale Prices on a Retailer's Shelf-Space and Pricing DecisionsDecis. Sci., 37
D. Desrochers, Gregory Gundlach, A. Foer (2003)
Analysis of Antitrust Challenges to Category Captain ArrangementsJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22
X. Vives (1999)
Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools
Rakesh Niraj, C. Narasimhan (2004)
Vertical Information Sharing in Distribution Channels
Wan Yusong, J. Raju, S. Dhar (2004)
The Choice and Consequences of Using a Category Captain for Category Management
P. Baily (1978)
Market structure and behaviour
M. Corstjens, P. Doyle (1981)
A Model for Optimizing Retail Space AllocationsManagement Science, 27
Shelf‐space scarcity is a predominant aspect of the consumer goods industry. This paper analyzes its implications for category management. We consider a model where two competing manufacturers sell their differentiated products through a single retailer who determines the shelf space allocated to the category. The scope of category management is pricing. We consider two category management mechanisms: retailer category management (RCM), where the retailer determines product prices and category captainship (CC), where a manufacturer in the category determines them. Our analysis reveals that the retailer can use the form of category management and the category shelf space to control the intensity of competition between manufacturers to his benefit. We also show that the emergence of CC depends on the degree of product differentiation, the opportunity cost of shelf space, and the profit sharing arrangement in the alliance. The equilibrium category shelf space under CC may be higher than under RCM if the value to the retailer of eliminating double marginalization and putting price pressure on the non‐captain manufacturer dominates the loss from sharing the profit with the category captain. CC has been criticized for disadvantaging non‐captain manufacturers. While we provide some support for this claim, we also find that CC may benefit non‐captain manufacturers when implemented by a powerful retailer in categories with sufficiently differentiated products, because the shelf space allocated to the category increases in this case.
Production and Operations Management – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.