Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Bukh, J. Mouritsen, H. Larsen, Gitte Hansen, Gustav Jeppesen, Benedikte Stakemann, Darlush Rezai, Bjarne Andersen, Sten Rasmussen, L. Nielsen (2000)
A Guide for Intellectual Capital Statements - A Key to Knowledge Management
(2002)
Ownership and financial structures in Finnish biotech SMEs. ETLA discussion paper no. 835, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA)
Karl-Erik Sveiby (1997)
The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets
G. Ahonen (2000)
Generative and Commercially Exploitable Intangible Assets
(1995)
seminal model in which they interpret how the tacit knowledge is converted to explicit knowledge and back to the tacit knowledge of other individuals and groups
I. Linnosmaa, R. Hermans, T. Hallinen (2004)
Price-cost margin in the pharmaceutical industry. Empirical evidence from Finland.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 5 2
R. Hall (1999)
The Stock Market and Capital AccumulationLSN: Law & Finance: Empirical (Topic)
(1990)
Kunskapsledning. 101 ra˚d till ledare i kunskapsintensiva organisationer
(2001)
Intangible assets, measurement, drivers, usefulness. Unpublished discussion paper, Boston University and New York University, 32pp
(2002)
National Intellectual Capital Index: Intellectual Capital Development in the Arab Region
Tomi Hussi (2003)
RECONFIGURING KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Judith Cumby, Joan Conrod (2001)
Non‐financial performance measures in the Canadian biotechnology industryJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2
Hanna Kuusi (2001)
Finland a European Leader in Biotechnology
C. Phillips (1971)
Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance
Tomi Hussi, G. Ahonen (2002)
Managing intangible assets – a question of integration and delicate balanceJournal of Intellectual Capital, 3
(2003)
Principles of Corporate Financing (6th ed)
David Deeds (2001)
The Role of R&D Intensity, Technical Development and Absorptive Capacity in Creating Entrepreneurial Wealth in High Technology Start-UpsJournal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18
N. Bontis (2000)
Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital : framing and advancing the state of the field
R. Kroszner, Philip Strahan (1998)
What Drives Deregulation? The Economics and Politics of the Relaxation of Bank Branching RestrictionsBanking & Financial Institutions eJournal
(1997)
Intellectual Capital – The Proven Way to Establish your Company’s Real Value by Measuring its Hidden Brainpower. London: Judy Piatkus
(2002)
Measuring intellectual capital’s dynamic value: The IC-dVals approach
Linnosmaa Linnosmaa, Hermans Hermans, Hallinen Hallinen (2004)
Price–cost margin in the pharmaceutical industryThe European Journal of Health Economics
M. Darby, L. Zucker (2002)
Going Public When You Can in BiotechnologyERPN: Industry Studies (Sub-Topic)
B. Lev, Theodore Sougiannis (1996)
The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&DJournal of Accounting and Economics, 21
J. Hodgson (2003)
The Human Value of the Enterprise: Valuing People as Assets – Monitoring, Measuring, ManagingLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 24
S. Mann (1999)
Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of OrganizationsLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 20
The objective of the study was to empirically verify impacts of intellectual capital (IC) to the anticipated future sales of small‐ and medium‐sized companies within the biotechnology industry. The study creates and develops tools for the valuation of companies by relating the existing intangibles and the expected value creation of the companies in that industry displaying high growth prospects but long and insecure product development phases. Theoretically, IC is divided into the following three categories: human capital (HC), structural capital (SC), and relational capital (RC). In the empirical setting, survey data of small‐ and medium‐sized Finnish biotechnology companies are used. In the econometric analyses, the interactions, or empirical co‐variation, between the three categories of IC explain two‐thirds of the variance in the anticipated future sales of the sample companies. Thus, it seems that a well‐balanced combination of HC, SC, and RC implies value creation potential and high anticipated future sales.
R & D Management – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.