Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Courrau, N. Dudley, M. Hockings, Fiona Leverington, S. Stolton (2006)
Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas
(2011)
Filling the gaps : identifying candidate sites to expand Fiji ’ s national protected area network
J. Scott, F. Davis, B. Csuti, R. Noss, C. Groves, H. Anderson, S. Caicco, T. Edwards, J. Ulliman, R. Wright (1993)
GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
R. Pressey, K. Taffs (2001)
Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation lossBiological Conservation, 100
Sinéad Murphy, Peter Evans, E. Pinn, Graham Pierce (2002)
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
J. Cinner, M. Marnane, T. McClanahan (2005)
Conservation and Community Benefits from Traditional Coral Reef Management at Ahus Island, Papua New GuineaConservation Biology, 19
R. Pomeroy, R. Pollnac, B. Katon, C. Predo (1997)
Evaluating factors contributing to the success of community-based coastal resource management: the Central Visayas Regional Project-1, PhilippinesOcean & Coastal Management, 36
Halpern Halpern, Warner Warner (2003)
Matching marine reserve design to reserve objectivesProceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 270
L. McCook, T. Ayling, M. Cappo, J. Choat, R. Evans, D. Freitas, M. Heupel, T. Hughes, G. Jones, B. Mapstone, H. Marsh, M. Mills, F. Molloy, C. Pitcher, R. Pressey, G. Russ, Stephen Sutton, H. Sweatman, R. Tobin, D. Wachenfeld, D. Williamson (2010)
Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: A globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reservesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107
H. Einhorn, R. Hogarth, Eric Klempner (1977)
Quality of Group JudgmentPsychological Bulletin, 84
(2010)
Fiji marine ecological gap assessment: interim progress report
H. Govan (2009)
Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the Pacific Island Region: meeting nature conservation and sustainable livelihood targets through wide-spread implementation of LMMAs
C. Bartlett, C. Manua, J. Cinner, Stephen Sutton, R. Jimmy, R. South, J. Nilsson, Jean-Baptiste Raina (2009)
Comparison of Outcomes of Permanently Closed and Periodically Harvested Coral Reef ReservesConservation Biology, 23
E. Sala, N. Knowlton (2006)
GLOBAL MARINE BIODIVERSITY TRENDSAnnual Review of Environment and Resources, 31
McCook McCook (2010)
Adaptive management and monitoring of the Great Barrier Reef: a globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reservesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 43
C. Rondinini, Federica Chiozza (2010)
Quantitative methods for defining percentage area targets for habitat types in conservation planningBiological Conservation, 143
D. Schweiger, William Sandberg, James Ragan (1986)
Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and ConsensusAcademy of Management Journal, 29
P. Desmet, R. Cowling (2004)
Using the Species-Area Relationship to Set Baseline Targets for ConservationEcology and Society, 9
G. Russ (2002)
Yet another review of marine reserves as reef fishery management tools
C. Margules, R. Pressey (2000)
Systematic conservation planningNature, 405
T. McClanahan, J. Davies, J. Maina (2005)
Factors influencing resource users and managers' perceptions towards marine protected area management in KenyaEnvironmental Conservation, 32
T. Agardy, P. Bridgewater, M. Crosby, P. Dayton, R. Kenchington, P. Murray, John Parks, Lelei Peau, Barrier Reef (2003)
Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areasAquatic Conservation-marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 13
G. Shahabuddin, Madhu Rao (2010)
Do community-conserved areas effectively conserve biological diversity? Global insights and the Indian context.Biological Conservation, 143
L. Teh, L. Teh, B. Starkhouse, U. Sumaila (2009)
An overview of socio-economic and ecological perspectives of Fiji's inshore reef fisheriesMarine Policy, 33
R. Weeks, G. Russ, A. Alcala, Alan White (2010)
Effectiveness of Marine Protected Areas in the Philippines for Biodiversity ConservationConservation Biology, 24
R. Johannes, T. Court (2002)
The Renaissance of Community-Based Marine Resource Management in OceaniaAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 33
最首 太郎 (1999)
生物多様性条約 (Convention on Biological Diversity) 中間会合報告, 57
T. McClanahan, J. Maina, J. Davies (2005)
Perceptions of resource users and managers towards fisheries management options in Kenyan coral reefsFisheries Management and Ecology, 12
B. Halpern, R. Warner (2003)
Review Paper. Matching marine reserve design to reserve objectivesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270
M. Hockings, S. Stolton, Fiona Leverington (2006)
Evaluating effectiveness : a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas, 2nd edition
Louisa Wood, L. Fish, Josh Laughren, D. Pauly (2008)
Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: shortfalls in information and actionOryx, 42
T. Martin, P. Kuhnert, K. Mengersen, H. Possingham (2005)
The power of expert opinion in ecological models using Bayesian methods: impact of grazing on birdsEcological Applications, 15
I. Mitroff, J. Emshoff, R. Kilmann (1979)
Assumptional Analysis: A Methodology for Strategic Problem SolvingManagement Science, 25
G. Russ, A. Alcala (1999)
Management histories of Sumilon and Apo Marine Reserves, Philippines, and their influence on national marine resource policyCoral Reefs, 18
H. Edwards, Ian Elliott, R. Pressey, P. Mumby (2010)
Incorporating ontogenetic dispersal, ecological processes and conservation zoning into reserve designBiological Conservation, 143
P. Clarke, S. Jupiter (2010)
Law, custom and community-based natural resource management in Kubulau District (Fiji)Environmental Conservation, 37
C. Margules, S. Sarkar (2007)
Systematic conservation planning.
S. Aswani, R. Hamilton (2004)
The value of many small vs. few large marine protected areas in the Western Solomon Islands
C. Mora, S. Andréfouët, Mark Costello, Christine Kranenburg, A. Rollo, J. Veron, K. Gaston, R. Myers (2006)
Coral Reefs and the Global Network of Marine Protected AreasScience, 312
N. Salafsky, R. Margoluis, K. Redford, John Robinson (2002)
Improving the Practice of Conservation: a Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda for Conservation ScienceConservation Biology, 16
S. Lester, B. Halpern, K. Grorud‐Colvert, J. Lubchenco, B. Ruttenberg, S. Gaines, S. Airamé, R. Warner (2009)
Biological effects within no-take marine reserves : a global synthesis
Abstract: Every action in a conservation plan has a different level of effect and consequently contributes differentially to conservation. We examined how several community‐based, marine, management actions differed in their contribution to national‐level conservation goals in Fiji. We held a workshop with experts on local fauna and flora and local marine management actions to translate conservation goals developed by the national government into ecosystem‐specific quantitative objectives and to estimate the relative effectiveness of Fiji's community‐based management actions in achieving these objectives. The national conservation objectives were to effectively manage 30% of the nation's fringing reefs, nonfringing reefs, mangroves, and intertidal ecosystems (30% objective) and 10% of other benthic ecosystems (10% objective). The experts evaluated the contribution of the various management actions toward national objectives. Scores ranged from 0 (ineffective) to 1 (maximum effectiveness) and included the following management actions: permanent closures (i.e., all extractive use of resources prohibited indefinitely) (score of 1); conditional closures harvested once per year or less as dictated by a management plan (0.50–0.95); conditional closures harvested without predetermined frequency or duration (0.10–0.85); other management actions, such as regulations on gear and species harvested (0.15–0.50). Through 3 gap analyses, we assessed whether the conservation objectives in Fiji had been achieved. Each analysis was based on a different assumption: (1) all parts of locally managed marine areas (including closures and other management) conserve species and ecosystems effectively; (2) closures conserve species and ecosystems, whereas areas outside closures, open to varying levels of resource extraction, do not; and (3) actions that allow different levels of resource extraction vary in their ability to conserve species and ecosystems. Under assumption 1, Fiji's national conservation objectives were exceeded in all marine ecosystems; under assumption 2, none of Fiji's conservation objectives were met; and under assumption 3, on the basis of the scores assigned by experts, Fiji achieved the 10% but not the 30% objectives for ecosystems. Understanding the relative contribution of management actions to achieving conservation objectives is critical in the assessment of conservation achievements at the national level, where multiple management actions will be needed to achieve national conservation objectives.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.