Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1996)
Predicting the occur- Conservation Biology
Magne Sætersdal, J. Line, H. Birks (1993)
How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: Vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, western NorwayBiological Conservation, 66
(1999)
Editorial – systematic conservation planning for the real world
M. Araújo, Paul Williams (2000)
Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence dataBiological Conservation, 96
A. Moilanen, Andrew Smith, I. Hanski (1998)
Long‐Term Dynamics in a Metapopulation of the American PikaThe American Naturalist, 152
S. Freitag, A. Jaarsveld (1998)
Sensitivity of selection procedures for priority conservation areas to survey extent, survey intensity and taxonomic knowledgeProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265
R. Pressey, K. Taffs (2001)
Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation lossBiological Conservation, 100
S. Fomin (1970)
[Some mathematical problems of biology].Biofizika, 15 2
R. Pressey, A. Nicholls (1989)
Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approachesBiological Conservation, 50
I. Hanski (1998)
Metapopulation dynamicsNature, 396
R. Pressey, H. Possingham, C. Margules (1996)
Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much?Biological Conservation, 76
R. Pressey, H. Possingham, J. Day (1997)
Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reservesBiological Conservation, 80
C. Margules, A. Nicholls, M. Usher (1994)
Apparent species turnover, probability of extinction and the selection of nature reserves A case study of the Ingleborough limestone pavementsConservation Biology, 8
L. Underhill (1994)
Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithmsBiological Conservation, 70
A. Moilanen, M. Cabeza (2002)
Single‐species dynamic site selectionEcological Applications, 12
R. Macarthur, E. Wilson (1969)
The Theory of Island Biogeography
Ron Pulliam (1988)
Sources, Sinks, and Population RegulationThe American Naturalist, 132
N. Wahlberg, A. Moilanen, I. Hanski (1996)
Predicting the Occurrence of Endangered Species in Fragmented LandscapesScience, 273
A. Nicholls, C. Margules (1993)
An upgraded reserve selection algorithmBiological Conservation, 64
(1991)
The role of ecological theory in planning reintroduction of endangered species
H. Bibelriether (1984)
Bayerischer Wald National Park threatened by air pollution., 9
Pressey Pressey (1999)
Systematic conservation planning for the real world.Parks, 9
D. Tilman, R. May, C. Lehman, M. Nowak (1994)
Habitat destruction and the extinction debtNature, 371
M. Gyllenberg, I. Hanski (1997)
Habitat Deterioration, Habitat Destruction, and Metapopulation Persistence in a Heterogenous LandscapeTheoretical population biology, 52 3
A. Rodrigues, J. Cerdeira, K. Gaston (2000)
Flexibility, efficiency, and accountability: adapting reserve selection algorithms to more complex conservation problemsEcography, 23
M. Araújo, Paul Williams, R. Fuller (2002)
Dynamics of extinction and the selection of nature reservesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269
R. Etienne (2000)
Local populations of different sizes, mechanistic rescue effect and patch preference in the Levins metapopulation modelBulletin of Mathematical Biology, 62
R. Cowling, R. Pressey (2001)
Rapid plant diversification: Planning for an evolutionary futureProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98
R. Pressey, C. Humphries, C. Margules, R. Vane-Wright, P. Williams (1993)
Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection.Trends in ecology & evolution, 8 4
M. Cabeza, A. Moilanen (2001)
Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity.Trends in ecology & evolution, 16 5
S. Pimm, A. Redfearn (1988)
The variability of population densitiesNature, 334
H. Possingham, J. Day, M. Goldfinch, F. Salzborn (1993)
The mathematics of designing a network of protected areas for conservation
(1998)
Key sites for conservation : area - selection methods for biodiversity
Sætersdal Sætersdal, Line Line, Birks Birks (1993)
How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands.Western Norway. Biological Conservation, 66
K. Virolainen, Teija Virola, J. Suhonen, M. Kuitunen, Antti Lammi, P. Siikamäki (1999)
Selecting networks of nature reserves: methods do affect the long-term outcomeProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266
R. Cowling, R. Pressey, A. Lombard, P. Desmet, A. Ellis (1999)
From representation to persistence: requirements for a sustainable system of conservation areas in the species‐rich mediterranean‐climate desert of southern AfricaDiversity and Distributions, 5
(2001)
Complementarity. Pages 813-829 in
A. Veldkamp, E. Lambin (2001)
Predicting land-use changeAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85
A. Moilanen (2002)
Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and applicationOikos, 96
A. Jaarsveld, Stefanie Freitag, S. Chown, Caron Muller, Stephanie Koch, H. Hull, Chuck Bellamy, Martin Krüger, Sebastian Endrödy-Younga, M. Mansell, Clarke Scholtz (1998)
Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategiesScience, 279 5359
Ana Rodrigues, Rosalind Tratt, Bryan Wheeler, Kevin Gaston (1999)
The performance of existing networks of conservation areas in representing biodiversityProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266
(2000)
Population viability analysis using occupancy models
(1999)
Systematic reserve selection in the USA : an example from the Columbia Plateau ecoregion
O. Ovaskainen (2002)
The Effective Size of a Metapopulation Living in a Heterogeneous Patch NetworkThe American Naturalist, 160
I. Hanski, O. Ovaskainen (2002)
Extinction Debt at Extinction ThresholdConservation Biology, 16
I. Hanski (1994)
A Practical Model of Metapopulation DynamicsJournal of Animal Ecology, 63
S. Pimm, P. Raven (2000)
Biodiversity: Extinction by numbersNature, 403
M. Kershaw, P. Williams, G. Mace (1994)
Conservation of Afrotropical antelopes: consequences and efficiency of using different site selection methods and diversity criteriaBiodiversity & Conservation, 3
R. Macarthur, E. Wilson (1963)
AN EQUILIBRIUM THEORY OF INSULAR ZOOGEOGRAPHYEvolution, 17
Pimm Pimm, Raven Raven (2001)
Extinction by numbers.Nature, 403
S. Serneels, E. Lambin (2001)
Proximate causes of land-use change in Narok District, Kenya: a spatial statistical modelAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85
Paul Williams, Miguel Araéjo (2000)
Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservationProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267
J. Terborgh (1991)
Diversity and the tropical rain forest
Cowling Cowling, Pressey Pressey, Lombard Lombard, Desmet Desmet, Ellis Ellis (1999)
From representation to persistence: requirements for a sustainable reserve system in the species‐rich mediterranean‐climate deserts of southern Africa.Diversity and Distributions, 5
O. Ovaskainen, I. Hanski (2002)
Transient dynamics in metapopulation response to perturbation.Theoretical population biology, 61 3
C. Margules, R. Pressey (2000)
Systematic conservation planningNature, 405
C. Willis, A. Lombard, R. Cowling, B. Heydenrych, C. Burgers (1996)
Reserve systems for limestone endemic flora of the Cape Lowland Fynbos: Iterative versus linear programmingBiological Conservation, 77
Moilanen Moilanen, Smith Smith, Hanski Hanski (1998)
Long‐term persistence in a metapopulation of the American pika.The American Naturalist, 152
A. Rodrigues, R. Gregory, K. Gaston (2000)
Robustness of reserve selection procedures under temporal species turnoverProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267
(2000)
Mathematical methods for reserve system design Quantitative methods for conservation biology
(1998)
Integrating population abundance , dynamics and distribution into broad - scale priority setting
H. Possingham, I. Ball, S. Andelman (2000)
Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks
B. Csuti, S. Polasky, P. Williams, R. Pressey, J. Camm, M. Kershaw, A. Kiester, Brian Downs, Richard Hamilton, M. Huso, K. Sahr (1997)
A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in OregonBiological Conservation, 80
I. Hanski, A. Moilanen, M. Gyllenberg (1996)
Minimum Viable Metapopulation SizeThe American Naturalist, 147
(1991)
Single-species metapopulation dynamics. Pages 17–38 in M. Gilpin and I. Hanski, editors. Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations
I. Hanski, D. Simberloff (1997)
The Metapopulation Approach, Its History, Conceptual Domain, and Application to Conservation
A. Moilanen (1999)
PATCH OCCUPANCY MODELS OF METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS: EFFICIENT PARAMETER ESTIMATION USING IMPLICIT STATISTICAL INFERENCEEcology, 80
R. Levins (1969)
Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological ControlBulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 15
Abstract: Site‐selection algorithms are used in reserve design to select networks of sites that maximize biodiversity, given some constraints. These algorithms are based on a snapshot of species occurrence, and they typically aim to minimize the area or cost needed to represent all the species once or a few times. Most of these algorithms ignore the question of how well species are likely to persist in the set of selected sites in the long term. Furthermore, the role of the unselected habitat in biodiversity persistence has received no attention in this context. We used a theoretical approach to evaluate the long‐term performance of reserve networks in preserving biodiversity by using a model of spatiotemporal population dynamics ( a metapopulation model ). We compared extinction rates of species in reserve networks in two situations: when all sites remain suitable habitat for the species and, conversely, when the habitat in the unselected sites is lost. We made this comparison to explore the significance of unselected sites for spatial population dynamics and for the continued presence of species in the reserve network. Basic site‐selection algorithms are liable to perform badly in terms of biodiversity maintenance because the persistence of species may be strongly dependent on sites not included in the reserve network. Our results support recent calls for the integration of spatial population modeling into reserve network design. Advances in metapopulation theory provide tools that can be used for this purpose.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.