Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Perrow (1967)
A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONSAmerican Sociological Review, 32
Venkatraman Venkatraman (1989)
“The Concept of Fit in Strategic Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence,”Academy of Management Review, 15
R. Marsh, Hiroshi Mannari (1981)
Technology and Size as Determinants of the Organizational Structure of Japanese FactoriesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 26
D. Pugh, D. Hickson, C. Hinings, C. Turner (1969)
The Context of Organization StructuresAdministrative Science Quarterly, 14
J. Child (1975)
MANAGERIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE‐PART II. A CONTINGENCY ANALYSISJournal of Management Studies, 12
J. Child (1974)
MANAGERIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE PART IJournal of Management Studies, 11
Neuman Neuman (1987)
“OVA–Avoid Slash and Burn Overhead Reduction,”Management Review, 76
John Freeman (1973)
Environment, Technology, and the Administrative Intensity of Manufacturing OrganizationsAmerican Sociological Review, 38
Jacob Cohen (1978)
Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components.Psychological Bulletin, 85
J. Child (1973)
Parkinson's Progress: Accounting for the Number of Specialists in OrganizationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 18
Subhash Sharma, R. Durand, Oded Gur-Arie (1981)
Identification and Analysis of Moderator VariablesJournal of Marketing Research, 18
L. Pondy (1969)
Effects of Size, Complexity, and Ownership on Administrative IntensityAdministrative Science Quarterly, 14
R. Hayes, W. Abernathy (2007)
Managing our way to economic declineHarvard Business Review, 85
Pare Pare (1989)
“How to Cut the Cost of Headquarters,”Fortune
S. Melman (1951)
The rise of administrative overhead in the manufacturing industries of The United States, 1899-1947, 3
Despite the attention given to restructuring and trimming down manufacturing firms during the 198Os, little attention has been paid to the mix of skills they needed under different circumstances. We examined the patterns of employment by occupation in manufacturing industries utilizing different production technologies and the effect of establishment size on nonproduction employment. We found that a relationship exists between production technology and nonproduction employment per 100 production workers. Establishment size is found to be a moderator between nonproduction employment and production technology. Our findings imply two clear messages for managers. First, when considering major changes in production technology, managers should be aware that the supporting skills they will need from their nonproduction work force are likely to change greatly. Further, these changes involve technical and managerial workers as well as clerical and production support people. Second, they should restructure the functional or occupational mix of an organization in the context of the process technologies in place. Different process technologies require different structures.
Production and Operations Management – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.