Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Thompson (1964)
ESCAPE FROM SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-RATIO REINFORCEMENT.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 7
D. Berlyne (1957)
Uncertainty and conflict: a point of contact between information-theory and behavior-theory concepts.Psychological review, 64, Part 1 6
A. Kaufman, Alan Baron (1968)
Suppression of behavior by timeout punishment when suppression results in loss of positive reinforcement.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 11 5
(1955)
Behavioral consequences of the removal of a discriminative stimulus associated with variable-interval reinforcement
Differential reinforcing effects of stimuli associated with the presence or absence of a schedule of punishment
James Appel (1963)
Aversive aspects of a schedule of positive reinforcement.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 6
(1973)
Reinforcing properties of informative stimuli : the case of the reinforcing effects of a stimulus correlated with non - reinforcement
J. Dinsmoor, M. Browne, Charles Lawrence (1972)
A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 18 1
L. Wyckoff (1952)
The role of observing responses in discrimination learning.Psychological review, 59 6
N. Azrin (1961)
Time-out from Positive ReinforcementScience, 133
D. Lieberman (1972)
Secondary reinforcement and information as determinants of observing behavior in monkeys (Macaca mulatta)Learning and Motivation, 3
M. Rilling, H. Askew, H. Askew, J. Ahlskog, J. Ahlskog, T. Kramer (1969)
Aversive properties of the negative stimulus in a successive discrimination.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 12 6
S. Kendall, D. Gibson (1965)
Effects of Discriminative Stimulus Removal on Observing BehaviorThe Psychological Record, 15
H. Terrace (1971)
Escape from SLearning and Motivation, 2
M. Rilling, T. Kramer, R. Richards (1973)
Aversive properties of the negative stimulus during learning with and without errorsLearning and Motivation, 4
R. Wilton, R. Clements (1971)
The role of information in the emission of observing responses: a test of two hypotheses.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 16 2
S. Kendall (1972)
Some effects of response-dependent clock stimuli in a fixed-interval schedule.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 17 2
Donald Thompson (1965)
PUNISHMENT BY SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-RATIO REINFORCEMENT.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 8
H. Jenkins, R. Boakes (1973)
Observing stimulus sources that signal food or no food.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 20 2
J. Carlson (1972)
Timeout punishment: Rate of reinforcement and delay of timeout☆Learning and Motivation, 3
Harold Leitenberg (1965)
Is time-out from positive reinforcement an aversive event? A review of the experimental evidence.Psychological bulletin, 64 6
C. Ferster (1958)
Control of behavior in chimpanzees and pigeons by time out from positive reinforcement., 72
J. Carlson (1970)
Delay of primary reinforcement if effects of two forms of response-contingent time-out.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 70
A. Baron, A. Kaufman (1969)
Time-out punishment: Preexposure to time-out and opportunity to respond during time-out.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67
(1969)
Response-cue contingency and cue effectiveness
To determine the effect of a negative discriminative stimulus on the response producing it, two pigeons were each studied in a three‐key conditioning chamber. During alternating periods of unpredictable duration, pecking the center (food) key either was reinforced with grain on a variable‐interval schedule or was never reinforced. On equal but independent variable‐interval schedules, pecking either of the side (observing) keys changed the color of all keys for 30 sec from yellow to either green or red. When the schedule on the center key was variable‐interval reinforcement, the color was green (positive discriminative stimulus); when no reinforcements were scheduled, the color was red (negative discriminative stimulus). Since pecking the side keys did not affect grain deliveries, changes in the rate of pecking could not be ascribed to changes in the frequency of primary reinforcement. In subsequent sessions, red was withheld as one of the possible consequences of pecking a given side key. When red was omitted, the rate on that key increased, and when red was restored, the rate decreased. It was concluded that red illumination of the keys, the negative discriminative stimulus, had a suppressive effect on the response that produced it.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1974
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.