Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/scale-effects-in-capital-markets-based-accounting-research-KKjCfVJ55d
References (41)
-
Mary Barth, Sanjay Kallapur (1996)
The Effects of Cross‐Sectional Scale Differences on Regression Results in Empirical Accounting Research*Contemporary Accounting Research, 13
-
(2000)
Valuation-Based Research Implications for Financial Reporting and Opportunities for Future Research. -
Easton (2003)
Scale and the Scale Effect in Market-Based Accounting ResearchJournal of Business Finance & Accounting
-
(2000)
Issue 1 (Winter) -
Barth (2001)
The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another ViewJournal of Accounting and Economics
-
(2000)
A General Analysis of The Impact of Scale Differences when Interpreting R 2 as an Indicator of Value-Relevance -
(2000)
Scale Factor and R2. -
Stephen Brown, Kin Lo, Thomas Lys (1998)
Use of R-Squared in Accounting Research: Measuring Changes in Value Relevance Over the Last Four DecadesFinancial Accounting
-
(1988)
Cross–Sectional Capital Market Research and Model Specification, -
Peter Easton, G. Sommers (2003)
Scale and Scale Effects in Market-Based Accounting ResearchSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
-
John Hand, W. Landsman (1999)
The Pricing of Dividends in Equity ValuationFinancial Accounting eJournal
-
R. Pindyck, D. Rubinfeld (2002)
Econometric models and economic forecasts -
R. Park (1966)
Estimation with Heteroscedastic Error TermsEconometrica, 34
-
V. Bernard (1987)
CROSS-SECTIONAL DEPENDENCE AND PROBLEMS IN INFERENCE IN MARKET-BASED ACCOUNTING RESEARCHJournal of Accounting Research, 25
-
Jing Liu, James Ohlson (2000)
The Feltham-Ohlson (1995) Model: Empirical ImplicationsJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 15
-
Akbar (2003)
Discussion of Scale and the Scale Effect in Market-Based Accounting ResearchJournal of Business Finance & Accounting
-
Mary Barth, W. Beaver, John Hand, W. Landsman (1999)
Accruals, Cash Flow and Equity ValuesSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
-
P. Schmidt (1985)
The Theory and Practice of Econometrics -
Mary Barth, W. Beaver, W. Landsman (2001)
The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another ViewCorporate Finance and Organizations eJournal
-
James Ohlson (2000)
Residual Income Valuation: The ProblemsJournal of Accounting Abstracts
-
Peter Easton (1998)
Discussion of revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Association with share prices and non-market-based value estimatesJournal of Accounting Research, 36
-
S. Kothari, J. Zimmerman (1995)
Price and return modelsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 20
-
Charles Lee (1999)
Accounting‐Based Valuation: Impact on Business Practices and ResearchAccounting Horizons, 13
-
Peter Easton, T. Harris (1991)
EARNINGS AS AN EXPLANATORY VARIABLE FOR RETURNSJournal of Accounting Research, 29
-
Brown (1999)
Use of R2 in Accounting Research: Measuring Changes in Value Relevance over the Last Four DecadesJournal of Accounting and Economics
-
Gu (2005)
Scale Factor, R2, the Choice of Levels versus Returns ModelsJournal of Accounting, Auditing, & Finance
-
Kothari Kothari, Sabino Sabino, Zach Zach (2005)
Implications of Survival and Data Trimming for Tests of Market EfficiencyJournal of Accounting and Economics, 39
-
M. Morel (1999)
Multi-Lagged Specification of the Ohlson ModelJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 14
-
James Ohlson (1995)
Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation*Contemporary Accounting Research, 11
-
(2000)
WHITE, H -
Andrew Christie (1987)
On cross-sectional analysis in accounting researchJournal of Accounting and Economics, 9
-
H. White (1980)
A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 48
-
A. Chesher, I. Jewitt (1987)
The Bias of a Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix EstimatorEconometrica, 55
-
Hand Hand, Landsman Landsman (2005)
The Pricing of Dividends in Equity ValuationJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32
-
James Myers (1999)
Implementing Residual Income Valuation With Linear Information DynamicsAccounting review: A quarterly journal of the American Accounting Association, 74
-
Mary Barth, W. Beaver, John Hand, W. Landsman (1999)
Accruals, Cash Flows, and Equity ValuesReview of Accounting Studies, 4
-
Mary Barth, Greg Clinch (1998)
Revalued Financial Tangible, and Intangible Assets: Associations with Share Prices and Non Market-Based Value EstimatesJournal of Accounting Research, 36
-
R. Frydman, G. Judge, W. Griffith, R. Hill, Tsoung-chao Lee (1981)
The Theory and Practice of EconometricsJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 3
-
Kin Lo, Thomas Lys (2000)
The Ohlson Model: Contribution to Valuation Theory, Limitations, and Empirical ApplicationsJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 15
-
Patricia Dechow, Amy Hutton, Richard Sloan (1999)
An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model1Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26
-
Peter Easton, P. Eddey, T. Harris (1993)
An Investigation Of Revaluations Of Tangible Long-Lived AssetsJournal of Accounting Research, 31
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- © 2009 The Authors Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- ISSN
- 0306-686X
- eISSN
- 1468-5957
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02133.x
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Abstract: Based on data simulated using a modified Ohlson (1995) valuation model, we investigate effects on inferences of five potential scale‐related effects: multiplicative and additive omitted scale factors, scale‐varying coefficients, survivorship, and heteroscedasticity. We find that diagnostics identified in prior research are not successful in detecting or distinguishing these scale effects. Thus, we investigate the effectiveness at mitigating scale effects of six specifications of regressions of equity market value on equity book value and earnings: undeflated, share‐deflated, equity book value‐deflated, lagged price‐deflated, returns, and equity market value‐deflated. For each specification, we compare frequency of correct rejection that the coefficients equal zero, coefficient bias and absolute error, and regression explanatory power. We find that share‐deflated and undeflated specifications generally perform the best, regardless of the type of scale effect.
Journal
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2009