Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Billeter, N. Namboodiri, L. Carter, H. Blalock (1975)
Applied multivariate analysis and experimental designs
Clemans Clemans (1966)
An analytical and empirical examination of some properties of ipsative measuresPsychometric Monographs, 14
S. Ball-Rokeach (1976)
Receptivity to Sexual EqualitySociological Perspectives, 19
M. Rokeach (1969)
Part I. Value Systems in ReligionReview of Religious Research, 11
Ball‐Rokeach Ball‐Rokeach (1976)
Receptivity to sexual equalityPacific Sociological Review, 19
N. Feather (1975)
Values in education and society
N. Feather (1973)
The measurement of values: Effects of different assessment proceduresAustralian Journal of Psychology, 25
L. Hicks (1970)
Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures.Psychological Bulletin, 74
D. Campbell, D. Fiske (1959)
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological bulletin, 56 2
Rokeach Rokeach (1969b)
Religious values and social compassionReview of Religious Research, 11
M. Moore (1975)
Rating versus ranking in the Rokeach Value Survey: An Israeli comparisonEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 5
T. Greenstein, Richard Bennett (1974)
Order effects in Rokeach's Value Survey☆Journal of Research in Personality, 8
M. Rokeach (1969)
Part II. Religious Values and Social CompassionReview of Religious Research, 11
Rokeach Rokeach (1969a)
Value systems in religionReview of Religious Research, 11
M. Rokeach (1974)
The Nature Of Human Values
Penner Penner (1971)
Interpersonal attraction toward a black person as a function of value importancePersonality: An International Journal, 2
B. Baker, C. Hardyck, L. Petrinovich (1966)
Weak Measurements vs. Strong Statistics: An Empirical Critique of S. S. Stevens' Proscriptions nn StatisticsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 26
L. Cronbach, P. Meehl (1955)
Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological bulletin, 52 4
D. Jackson (1969)
Multimethod factor analysis in the evaluation of convergent and discriminant validity.Psychological Bulletin, 72
Compared the validity and reliability of 2 value measurement techniques. 296 Ss (161 females and 135 males) in introductory psychology filled out the 2 measurement techniques and an attitude survey. The Rokeach Value Survey instructed Ss to separately rank 2 sets of 18 values in order of importance. A rating version of the Value Survey instructed Ss to rate the same 36 values from 1 to 99. 236 Sreturned 6 weeks later and again filled out both measurement techniques. Results of the multimethod factor analysis indicate very good convergent validity among the 4 measures of a given value (2 techniques × 2 sessions) and very good discriminant validity between measures of different values. Probably due to the ipsative nature of the ranking procedure, the test‐retest reliabilities were higher for the ranked measurements than for the rated measurements. The construct validity of both measurement techniques, as determined by multiple regression and analysis of variance, were similar. Despite criticisms of ranking procedures, both the ranked and the rated versions were of equal reliability and validity.
European Journal of Social Psychology – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 1980
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.