Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Pierre Perron (1989)
Testing For A Random Walk: A Simulation Experiment Of Power When The Simpling Interval Is Varied
M. David, M. James, H. Lawrence (1990)
CUTLER, POTERBA and SUMMERS, . Speculative Dynamics and the Role of Feedback Economic Review, , ., 80
(1991)
A Variance Decomposition for Stock Returns
G. Evans, N. Savin (1984)
Testing for Unit Roots: 2Econometrica, 52
G. Schwert (1990)
Stock Returns and Real Activity: a Century of EvidenceERN: Business Fluctuations; Cycles (Topic)
L. Hansen, R. Hodrick (1980)
Forward Exchange Rates as Optimal Predictors of Future Spot Rates: An Econometric AnalysisJournal of Political Economy, 88
Scott Smith (1990)
Book Review: Computer Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An IntroductionJournal of Marketing Research, 27
Ronald Balvers, T. Cosimano, B. Mcdonald (1990)
Predicting Stock Returns in an Efficient MarketJournal of Finance, 45
Hansen Hansen, Robert Robert (1980)
Forward exchange rates as optimal predictors of future exchange rates: An econometric analysisJournal of Political Economy, 88
Kim Kim, Charles Charles, Richard Richard (1991)
Mean reversion in stock prices: A reappraisal of the empirical evidenceReview of Economic Studies, 58
E. Fama, K. French (1988)
Dividend yields and expected stock returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 22
D. Dickey, W. Fuller (1979)
Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit RootJournal of the American Statistical Association, 74
Mankiw Mankiw, Matthew Matthew (1986)
Do we reject too often?Economics Letters, 20
G. Schwert (1988)
Why Does Stock Market Volatility Change Over Time?NBER Working Paper Series
M. Richardson, Thomas Smith (1991)
Tests of financial models in the presence of overlapping observationsReview of Financial Studies, 4
C. Nelson, Heejoon Kang (1981)
Spurious Periodicity in Inappropriately Detrended Time Series
Schwert Schwert (1989)
Why does stock market volatility change over time?Journal of Finance, 44
Myung-Jig Kim, C. Nelson, R. Startz (1988)
Mean Reversion in Stock Prices? a Reappraisal of the Empirical EvidenceNBER Working Paper Series
Donald Keim, R. Stambaugh (1986)
Predicting returns in the stock and bond marketsJournal of Financial Economics, 17
Campbell (1988)
Stock prices, earnings, and expected dividendsJournal of Finance, 43
E. Fama (1990)
Stock Returns, Expected Returns, and Real ActivityJournal of Finance, 45
J. Cochrane (1991)
Production‐Based Asset Pricing and the Link Between Stock Returns and Economic FluctuationsJournal of Finance, 46
C. Granger, P. Newbold (1974)
Spurious regressions in econometricsJournal of Econometrics, 2
M. Kendall (1954)
NOTE ON BIAS IN THE ESTIMATION OF AUTOCORRELATIONBiometrika, 41
Richardson Richardson, James James (1989)
Drawing inferences from statistics based on multi‐year asset returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 25
R. Hodrick (1991)
Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns: Alternative Procedures for Interference and MeasurementMonetary Economics
Cutler Cutler, James James, Lawrence Lawrence (1991)
Speculative dynamicsReview of Economic Studies, 58
N. Mankiw, M. Shapiro (1985)
Do We Reject Too Often? Small Sample Properties of Tests of Rational Expectations ModelsNBER Working Paper Series
Whitney Newey, K. West (1986)
A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelationconsistent Covariance MatrixEconometrics eJournal
Fama Fama (1990)
Stock returns, real returns, and economic activityJournal of Finance, 45
M. Richardson, J. Stock (1989)
Drawing Inferences from Statistics Based on Multi-Year Asset ReturnsMacroeconomics eJournal
ABSTRACT Predictive regressions are subject to two small sample biases: the coefficient estimate is biased if the predictor is endogenous, and asymptotic standard errors in the case of overlapping periods are biased downward. Both biases work in the direction of making t‐ratios too large so that standard inference may indicate predictability even if none is present. Using annual returns since 1872 and monthly returns since 1927 we estimate empirical distributions by randomizing residuals in the VAR representation of the variables. The estimated biases are large enough to affect inference in practice, and should be accounted for when studying predictability.
The Journal of Finance – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 1993
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.