Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Saegert, W. Swap, R. Zajonc (1973)
Exposure, context, and interpersonal attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25
J. Suls, C. Wan, G. Sanders (1988)
False Consensus and False Uniqueness in Estimating the Prevalence of Health‐Protective BehaviorsJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 18
S. Schachter (1951)
Deviation, rejection, and communication.Journal of abnormal psychology, 46 2
Israel Nebenzahl, J. Hornik (1985)
An Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of Commercial Billboards in Televised Sports ArenasInternational Journal of Advertising, 4
K. Parker (1991)
Sponsorship: The Research ContributionEuropean Journal of Marketing, 25
S. Asch (1955)
Opinions and Social PressureNature, 176
D. Marshall, G. Cook (1992)
The Corporate (Sports) SponsorInternational Journal of Advertising, 11
Christopher Wetzel, M. Walton (1985)
Developing biased social judgments: The false-consensus effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49
N. Kendall (1994)
‘Advertising Effectiveness: Findings from Empirical Research’Journal of Brand Management, 2
D. Byrne, D. Nelson (1965)
ATTRACTION AS A LINEAR FUNCTION OF PROPORTION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTS.Journal of personality and social psychology, 1
Meryl Gardner, P. Shuman (1987)
Sponsorship: An Important Component of the Promotions MixJournal of Advertising, 16
S. Sherman, Clark Presson, L. Chassin (1984)
Mechanisms Underlying the False Consensus EffectPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10
T. Meenaghan (1991)
Sponsorship – Legitimising the MediumEuropean Journal of Marketing, 25
B. Mullen, Lili Hu (1988)
Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta‐analytic integrationsBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 27
R. Nisbett, Ziva Kunda (1985)
Perception of social distributions.Journal of personality and social psychology, 48 2
R. Bornstein (1989)
Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987.Psychological Bulletin, 106
D. Thwaites (1995)
Professional Football Sponsorship—Profitable or Profligate?International Journal of Advertising, 14
B. Mullen, Jennifer Atkins, Debbie Champion, C. Edwards, D. Hardy, J. Story, Mary Vanderklok (1985)
The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis testsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21
R. Abratt, B. Clayton, L. Pitt (1987)
Corporate Objectives in Sports SponsorshipInternational Journal of Advertising, 6
E. Alluisi, D. Berlyne (1975)
Studies in the New Experimental AestheticsAmerican Journal of Psychology, 88
S. Sleight (1989)
Sponsorship : what it is and how to use it
G. Marks, N. Miller (1987)
Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical reviewPsychological Bulletin, 102
D. Mook (1983)
In defense of external invalidity.American Psychologist, 38
Terence Shimp (1990)
Promotion management and marketing communications
Rajan Varadarajan, Anil Menon (1988)
Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate PhilanthropyJournal of Marketing, 52
L. Ross (1977)
The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10
R. Zajonc (1968)
Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9
T. Meenaghan (1991)
The Role of Sponsorship in the Marketing Communications MixInternational Journal of Advertising, 10
Sports Sports sponsorship, spectator sponsorship, spectator recall recall and false consensus Roger Bennett Department of Business Studies, London Guildhall University, London, UK Keywords Advertising, Brands, Consumer behaviour, Sport, Sponsorship Abstract Zajonc's mere exposure hypothesis plus a variant of the Ross false consensus theorem were tested on samples of UK football (soccer) supporters categorised according to their frequency of attendance at three London football grounds. Spectator recall of sponsors' and other advertising business's posters (billboards) around the perimeters of playing pitches was measured and the level of false consensus (i.e. belief that team sponsors' brands are purchased by far higher proportions of, first, fellow supporters and, second, members of the general public than is actually the case) was assessed. Substantial mere exposure and false consensus effects were noted. Introduction Sponsorship is an important tool of marketing communication that seeks to achieve favourable publicity for a company and/or its brands within a certain target audience via the support of an activity not directly linked to the company's normal business. It is an indirect form of promotion: the company or brand name is incidental to the event being watched or the person supported by the sponsoring firm. A large amount of sponsorship
European Journal of Marketing – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.