Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Argelier, J. Delgenès, R. Moletta (1998)
Design of acidogenic reactors for the anaerobic treatment of the organic fraction of solid food wasteBioprocess Engineering, 18
Stucky Stucky, McCarty McCarty (1978)
Thermochemical treatment of nitrogenous materials to increase methane yieldBiotechnol Bioeng, 8
R. Zoetemeyer, J. Heuvel, A. Cohen (1982)
pH influence on acidogenic dissimilation of glucose in an anaerobic digestorWater Research, 16
N. Parmar, A. Singh, O. Ward (2001)
Enzyme treatment to reduce solids and improve settling of sewage sludgeJournal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 26
E. Choi, Hansaem Lee, Jae Lee, S. Oa (1996)
Another carbon source for BNR systemWater Science and Technology, 34
John Barlindhaug, H. Ødegaard (1996)
Thermal hydrolysis for the production of carbon source for denitrificationWater Science and Technology, 34
A. Greenberg, R. Trussell, L. Clesceri (1988)
Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition
N. Parmar, A. Singh, O. Ward (2001)
Characterization of the combined effects of enzyme, pH and temperature treatments for removal of pathogens from sewage sludgeWorld Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 17
Sang-Ill Lee, Jong-Ho Park, K. Ko, B. Koopman (1997)
Effect of fermented swine wastes on biological nutrient removal in sequencing batch reactorsWater Research, 31
K. Min, A. Khan, Mk Kwon, Yong-Jun Jung, Z. Yun, Y. Kiso (2005)
Acidogenic fermentation of blended food‐waste in combination with primary sludge for the production of volatile fatty acidsJournal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 80
L. Masse, K. Kennedy, S. Chou (2001)
The effect of an enzymatic pretreatment on the hydrolysis and size reduction of fat particles in slaughterhouse wastewaterJournal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 76
C. Lee, H. Shin, S. Chae, S. Nam, B. Paik (2003)
Nutrient removal using anaerobically fermented leachate of food waste in the BNR process.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 47 1
M. Higgins, J. Novak (1997)
Characterization of Exocellular Protein and Its Role in BioflocculationJournal of Environmental Engineering, 123
E. Salminen, J. Einola, J. Rintala (2003)
The methane production of poultry slaughtering residues and effects of pre‐treatments on the methane production of poultry featherEnvironmental Technology, 24
Eastman Eastman, Ferguson Ferguson (1981)
Solubilization of particulate organic carbon during the acid phase of anaerobic digestionJ Water Pollut Control Fed, 53
Rajan Rajan, Lin Lin, Ray Ray (1989)
Low‐level chemical pretreatment for enhanced sludge solubilizationJ Water Pollut Control Fed, 61
R. Moser-Engeler, K. Udert, D. Wild, H. Siegrist (1998)
Products from primary sludge fermentation and their suitability for nutrient removalWater Science and Technology, 38
Although food waste is a valuable carbon source for biological nutrient removal systems with low organic wastewater because of high C/N and C/P ratios, it must be pretreated to promote the hydrolysis of particulates, which is considered as a rate‐limiting step. This study investigated the effects of enzymatic pretreatment on hydrolytic solubilization of food waste with commercial enzyme. Both acidification efficiency and volatile fatty acid (VFA) production potential of enzymatically pretreated food waste were examined under controlled laboratory conditions. Experimental results indicated that protease exhibited the highest VSS reduction rate among three types of enzymes: carbohydrase, protease and lipase. A mixed enzyme treatment showed better reduction efficiency than a single enzyme treatment, and the highest volatile suspended solids (VSS) reduction was observed at an enzyme mixture ratio of 1:2:1 with carbohydrase:protease:lipase, respectively. It has been noted that pretreatment resulted in both maximum VFA production and the highest VFA content of soluble chemical oxygen demand at an enzyme mixture dosage of 0.1% (v/v). VFA production at this dosage revealed a 3.3 times higher rate than that of no‐enzyme added fermenter. The dominant VFAs were n‐butyrate followed by acetate. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.