Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Electrophoretic Identification of Raw and Cooked Shrimp using Various Protein Extraction Systems

Electrophoretic Identification of Raw and Cooked Shrimp using Various Protein Extraction Systems ABSTRACT Proteins were extracted from raw or cooked pink (Penaeus duorarum), white (Penaeus setiferus) or rock shrimp (Sicyonia brevirostris) with five different solutions: water, water homogenate adjusted to pH 8.0, 0.1M NaCl, 1% SDS, or 8M urea. Each extract from each species was analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE). Water extraction showed highly species‐specific banding patterns for raw shrimp, while patterns for SDS extracts were not as species‐specific. However, SDS extracts provided the greatest information on species variation of cooked shrimp. SDS‐PAGE was useful in distinguishing shrimp of different genus. This technique was tested and proven in a blind study to be useful for species identification and detection (within 10% of actual amount) of fabricated products. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Food Science Wiley

Electrophoretic Identification of Raw and Cooked Shrimp using Various Protein Extraction Systems

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/electrophoretic-identification-of-raw-and-cooked-shrimp-using-various-IhwS20oCyE

References (25)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0022-1147
eISSN
1750-3841
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb07696.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ABSTRACT Proteins were extracted from raw or cooked pink (Penaeus duorarum), white (Penaeus setiferus) or rock shrimp (Sicyonia brevirostris) with five different solutions: water, water homogenate adjusted to pH 8.0, 0.1M NaCl, 1% SDS, or 8M urea. Each extract from each species was analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE). Water extraction showed highly species‐specific banding patterns for raw shrimp, while patterns for SDS extracts were not as species‐specific. However, SDS extracts provided the greatest information on species variation of cooked shrimp. SDS‐PAGE was useful in distinguishing shrimp of different genus. This technique was tested and proven in a blind study to be useful for species identification and detection (within 10% of actual amount) of fabricated products.

Journal

Journal of Food ScienceWiley

Published: Mar 1, 1988

There are no references for this article.