Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Cheeseman, J. Wilesmith, F. Stuart (1989)
Tuberculosis: the disease and its epidemiology in the badger, a reviewEpidemiology and Infection, 103
P. Mallinson (1981)
THE POPULATION STRUCTURE, DENSITY AND PREVALENCE OF TUBERCULOSIS (MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS) IN BADGERS (MELES MELES) FROM FOUR AREAS IN SOUTH-WEST ENGLANDJournal of Applied Ecology, 18
T. Roper, P. Lüps (1993)
Disruption of territorial behaviour in badgers Meles meles, 58
Cheeseman Cheeseman, Mallinson Mallinson (1981)
Behaviour of badgers ( Meles meles ) infected with bovine tuberculosis.Journal of Zoology, 194
G. Smith, M. Richards, R. Clifton-Hadley, C. Cheeseman (1995)
Modelling bovine tuberculosis in badgers in England: preliminary results, 59
C. Doncaster, R. Woodroffe (1993)
Den site can determine shape and size of badger territories: implications for group-livingOikos, 66
R. Clifton-Hadley, AR Sayers, M. Stock (1995)
Evaluation of an ELISA for Mycobacterium bovis infection in badgers (Meles meles)Veterinary Record, 137
L. Rogers, R. Delahay, C. Cheeseman, S. Langton, G. Smith, R. Clifton-Hadley (1998)
Movement of badgers (Meles meles) in a high–density population: individual, population and disease effectsProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265
J. Krebs, R. Anderson, T. Clutton-Brock, I. Morrison, D. Young, C. Donnelley (1997)
Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle and Badgers
Kruuk Kruuk (1978)
Spatial organization and territorial behaviour of the European badger Meles meles .Journal of Zoology, 184
R. Woodroffe, D. Macdonald, J. Silva (1995)
Dispersal and philopatry in the European badger, Meles melesJournal of Zoology, 237
Woodroffe Woodroffe, Macdonald Macdonald (1993)
Badger sociality – models of spatial grouping.Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 65
C. Cheeseman, J. Wilesmith, F. Stuart, P. Mallinson (1988)
Dynamics of tuberculosis in a naturally infected Badger populationMammal Review, 18
J. Swinton, F. Tuyttens, D. MacDonald, D. Nokes, C. Cheeseman, R. Clifton-Hadley (1997)
A comparison of fertility control and lethal control of bovine tuberculosis in badgers: the impact of perturbation induced transmission.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 352 1353
Summary 1. Bovine tuberculosis is a serious disease of cattle caused by the bacillus Mycobacterium bovis. In south‐west England, badgers Meles meles sustain endemic M. bovis infection and almost certainly transmit the disease to cattle. When tuberculosis outbreaks have occurred in cattle, the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) therefore culled badgers to try to avert further outbreaks. 2. To limit the number of badgers killed, MAFF has assessed a possible new strategy (the ‘live test strategy’) that used a serological test to identify and remove infected badgers. However, because the test correctly identified only 41% of truly infected badgers, individuals were pooled according to the setts at which they were sampled. All badgers were culled at setts where one or more seropositive animals were caught. 3. On average, 1·9 ± 1·4 (SD) badgers were sampled at each sett. Using a simple model, we show that this level of sampling still gives a low (24–37%) probability of detecting infection at a given sett. 4. Badger social groups typically occupy more than one sett. We allocated setts to social groups by using Dirichlet tessellations and field signs to predict territory borders. On average, 3·3 ± 2·8 badgers were sampled in each group. Our model shows that this increase in sample size gives probabilities of detecting M. bovis in truly infected groups of 43–62%, which is still likely to be unacceptably low. 5. Culling badgers according to the setts where they were trapped led to incomplete removal of social groups; some seronegative badgers were released in 61% of groups containing seropositive animals. As infection is clustered within groups, it is likely that some infected animals were released even though they tested seronegative. Incomplete removal might also cause social disruption that could accelerate the transmission of M. bovis between social groups. 6. We conclude that the live test strategy, as implemented, would be unlikely to reduce the overall prevalence of M. bovis infection in badgers, and thus the risk to cattle. Furthermore, the poor sensitivity of the serological test makes it unlikely that modifications to the live test protocol could increase its cost‐effectiveness.
Journal of Applied Ecology – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.