Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Linda Moore, Boyd Davis (2002)
Quilting narrative: using repetition techniques to help elderly communicators.Geriatric nursing, 23 5
A. Wray (2002)
Formulaic Language and the Lexicon: List of Figures and Tables
A. Wray
Formulaic sequences and language disorders
A. Tremblay, H. Baayen
Holistic processing of regular four‐word sequences: a behavioural and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall
Steven Sabat (2001)
The Experience of Alzheimer's Disease: Life Through a Tangled Veil
J.B. Orange
Family caregivers, communication and Alzheimer's disease
A. Wray (2010)
‘We’ve had a wonderful, wonderful thing’: Formulaic interaction when an expert has dementiaDementia, 9
A. Wray
Formulaic Language and the Lexicon
A. Wray (2011)
Formulaic Language as a Barrier to Effective Communication with People with Alzheimer's DiseaseThe Canadian Modern Language Review / La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 67
A. Wray (2008)
Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries
B.H. Davis, M. Maclagan
Pauses, fillers, placeholders and formulaicity in Alzheimer's discourse: gluing relationships as impairment increases
Purpose – This paper aims to demonstrate how fundamental social and psychological drivers can affect the language used by people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their carers. Design/methodology/approach – A theoretical model is used to predict four ways in which communicative priorities in a given context will generate formulaic linguistic responses in interaction. Evidence from the language of both people with AD and their carers illustrates each point. Moreover, the model offers an explanation for several effective approaches for improving interaction. Findings – The paper explains the dynamics of a downward spiral in interaction that features more and more “formulaic” language, and indicates how carers can help create a context for greater empowerment of people with AD. Practical implications – Since people with AD need the stimulation of meaningful and targeted interaction, the downward spiral arising from carers' formulaic responses is potentially damaging. To improve the quality of communication between people with AD and their carers, the negative impact of formulaic language in interaction needs to be transformed into something more positive and productive. Indications are offered for how this can be achieved. Originality/value – The paper offers significant new insights into the causes of the well‐recognised patterns of repetitive language in people with AD, and explains how they can trigger unhelpful responses in carers. The theoretical underpinning offers opportunities for understanding how best to support carers in engaging more positively with people with AD, resulting in a richer type of communication for the latter and reduced stress levels for the former.
Quality in Ageing and Older Adults – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 7, 2012
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Formulaic language; Communication; Repetition; Routine; Carers; Social care
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.