Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Cooper (1990)
Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new productsBusiness Horizons, 33
T. Rickards (1996)
The management of innovation: Recasting the role of creativityEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5
G. Urban, J. Hauser (1980)
Design and marketing of new products
N. King (1992)
Modelling the innovation process: An empirical comparison of approachesJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65
Linda Lotto (1986)
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, 8
R. Calantone, C. Benedetto, M. Meloche (1988)
Strategies of Product and Process Innovation: A Loglinear AnalysisR & D Management, 18
W. Price, L. Bass (1969)
Scientific research and the innovative process.Science, 164 3881
J. Ettlie (1980)
Manpower Flows and the Innovation ProcessManagement Science, 26
R. Boxwell (1994)
Benchmarking for competitive advantage
T. Rickards (1998)
Assessing Organisational Creativity: An Innovative Benchmarking ApproachInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 02
G. Watson (1993)
Strategic Benchmarking: How to Rate Your Company's Performance against the World's Best
Subimal Bhattacharya (2006)
Operations managementShip Management
P. Josty (1990)
A tentative model of the innovation processR & D Management, 20
M. Hammer, J. Champy (1995)
REENGINEERING THE CORPORATION: A MANIFESTO FOR BUSINESS REVOLUTION
R. Johnstone (1967)
From Practice to Theory and BackNature, 213
J. Holloway, Matthew Hinton, David Mayle (1997)
Why benchmark? Understanding the processes of best practice benchmarking
S. Kline (1985)
Innovation Is Not a Linear ProcessResearch management, 28
Michael Porter (1980)
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
Henry Mintzberg (1993)
The rise and fall of strategic planning
M. Hammer, J. Champy (1993)
Reengineering the Corporation
P. Doyle (1994)
Marketing Management and Strategy
A project is reported that benchmarked ‘best practice’ mature organisations, with a base in the United Kingdom, on the processes and practices that they perceive underpinned successful innovation projects. The majority of organisations had director level personnel involved in the innovation process but only three had active involvement of the top management. However, the majority saw the greatest level of innovation being obtained through the use of cross‐functional teams. Five key innovation supports were identified during the benchmarking exercise. These were top management support for, and involvement in the process; the appointment of an innovation champion or sponsor; rewards for innovative behaviours and ideas; and finally a positive attitude to building on creative ideas, irrespective of their source. It is suggested that benchmarking can play a role in identifying best‐practice innovation structures and procedures.
Creativity and Innovation Management – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.