Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. P. Bostrom, J. S. Heinen (1977)
MIS problems and failures: A socio‐technical perspective. Part I: The causesIBM Systems Journal, 1
M. Olson, N. Chervany (1980)
The Relationship Between Organizational Characteristics and the Structure of the Information Services FunctionMIS Q., 4
N. Macintosh, R. Daft (1978)
User department technology and information designInf. Manag., 1
R. Nolan (1973)
Managing the computer resourceCommunications of the ACM, 16
B. Ives, M. Olson (1984)
User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of ResearchManagement Science, 30
P. Ein‐Dor, E. Segev (1982)
Organizational context and MIS structure: Some empirical evidenceSloan Management Review, 6
C. L. Biggs, E. G. Birks, W. Atkins (1980)
Managing the systems development processAdministrative Science Quarterly
G. A. Gorry, M. S. Scott Morton (1971)
A framework for management information systemsSloan Management Review, 13
Hugh Juergens (1977)
Attributes of Information System DevelopmentMIS Q., 1
B. Ives, M. H. Olsen, J. Baroudi (1983)
The measurement of user information satisfactionSloan Management Review, 26
P. Blau, Cecilia Falbe, W. Mckinley, Phelps Tracy (1976)
Technology and Organization in ManufacturingAdministrative Science Quarterly, 21
D. Robey, D. Farrow (1982)
User Involvement in Information System Development: A Conflict Model and Empirical TestManagement Science, 28
B. Ives, M. Olson, J. Baroudi (1983)
The measurement of user information satisfactionMicroeconomic Theory eJournal
B. Brabander, A. Edstrom (1977)
Successful information system development projectsHarvard Business Review, 24
R. Schonberger (1980)
MIS Design: A Contingency ApproachMIS Q., 4
M. Markus, D. Robey (1983)
The Organizational Validity of Management Information SystemsHuman Relations, 36
J. C. Nunnally (1978)
Psychometric theoryAdministrative Science Quarterly
Dale Zand, R. Sorensen (1975)
Theory of Change and the Effective Use of Management Science.Administrative Science Quarterly, 20
D. Robey (1979)
User Attitudes and Management Information System UseAcademy of Management Journal, 22
P. Ein‐Dor, E. Segev (1978)
Organizational context and the success of management information systemsMIS Quarterly, 24
N. H. Nie, C. H. Hull, J. G. Jenkins, K. Steinbrenner, D. H. Bent (1975)
Statistical package for the social sciencesMIS Quarterly
P. Ein-Dor, E. Segev (1982)
Organizational Context and MIS Structure: Some Empirical EvidenceMIS Q., 6
C. F. Gibson, R. I. Noland (1974)
Managing the four stages of EDP growthManagement Science, 52
J. Bailey, S. Pearson (1983)
Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User SatisfactionManagement Science, 29
H. C. Lucas (1981)
The analysis, design, and implementation of information systemsMIS Quarterly
G. B. Davis (1974)
Management information systems: Conceptual foundations, structure, and developmentManagement Science
G. Davis (1982)
Strategies for Information Requirements DeterminationIBM Syst. J., 21
B. Ives, M. H. Olson (1984)
User involvement and MIS success: A review of researchMIS Quarterly, 30
H. C. Lucas (1978)
Empirical evidence for a descriptive model of implementationSystems, Objectives, Solutions, 2
F. W. McFarlan (1981)
Portfolio approach to information systemsInformation and Management, 59
R. L. Nolan (1973)
Managing the computer resource: A stage hypothesisJournal of Marketing Research, 16
M. J. Ginzberg (1980)
An organizational contingencies view of accounting and information systems implementationCommunications of the ACM, 5
N. Bjorn‐Andersen, B. Hedberg (1977)
TIMS studies in the management sciencesManagement Science, 5
P. M. Blau, C. M. Falbe, W. McKinley, P. Tracy (1976)
Technology and organization in manufacturingMIS Quarterly, 21
A. Edstrom (1977)
User influence and the success of MIS projects: A contingency approachAccounting, Organizations and Society, 30
J. Glennon (1978)
MIS Systems: The Role of Authority and ResponsibilityMIS Q., 2
J. A. Senn (1978)
Information systems in management
R. Boland (1978)
The Process and Product of System DesignManagement Science, 24
G. B. Davis (1982)
Strategies for information requirements determinationMIS Quarterly, 21
M. L. Markus, D. Robey (1983)
The organizational validity of management information systemsManagement Science, 36
R. J. Boland (1978)
The process and product of systems designAcademy of Management Journal, 24
M. H. Olson, N. L. Chervany (1980)
The relationship between organizational characteristics and the structure of the information services functionManagement Science, 4
E. Mumford (1981)
Participative systems design: Structure and methodAcademy of Management Journal, 1
M. Ginzberg (1980)
An organizational contingencies view of accounting and information systems implementationAccounting Organizations and Society, 5
Lucas Hc (1978)
The evolution of an information system: from key-man to every person.Sloan Management Review, 19
B. Debrabander, A. Edstrom (1977)
Successful Information System Development ProjectsManagement Science, 24
R. Bostrom, J. Heinen (1977)
MIS Problems and failures: a sociotechnical perspective part I: the causeManagement Information Systems Quarterly, 1
H. F. Juergens (1977)
Attributions of information system developmentHarvard Business Review, 1
R. Zmud (1979)
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE*Management Science, 25
Subhash Sharma, R. Durand, Oded Gur-Arie (1981)
Identification and Analysis of Moderator VariablesJournal of Marketing Research, 18
E. Swanson (1974)
Management Information Systems: Appreciation and InvolvementManagement Science, 21
P. H. Cheney, G. W. Dickson (1982)
Organizational characteristics and information systems: An exploratory investigationManagement Science, 25
M. H. Kennedy, S. Mahaptra (1975)
Information analysis for effective planning and controlInformation and Management, 16
C. Schewe (1976)
The Management Information System User: An Exploratory Behavioral AnalysisAcademy of Management Journal, 19
Stanley Zionts, J. Wallenius (1983)
An Interactive Multiple Objective Linear Programming Method for a Class of Underlying Nonlinear Utility FunctionsManagement Science, 29
Laurent Bally, J. Brittan, K. Wagner (1977)
A prototype approach to information system design and developmentInf. Manag., 1
H. C. Lucas (1976)
The implementation of computer‐based modelsHuman Relations
H. Lucas (1978)
Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of ImplementationMIS Q., 2
P. Ein-Dor, E. Segev (1978)
Organizational Context and the Success of Management Information SystemsManagement Science, 24
N. B. McIntosh, R. L. Daft (1978)
User department technology and information designAcademy of Management Journal, 1
H. C. Lucas (1978)
Information systems concepts for managementHarvard Business Review
J. Cohen, P. Cohen (1975)
Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciencesHuman Relations
H. C. Lucas (1978)
The evolution of an information system: From key‐man to every personCommunications of the ACM, 19
M. Olson, B. Ives (1981)
User Involvement in System Design: An Empirical Test of Alternative ApproachesIO: Productivity
A. Edstrom (1977)
User Influence and the Success of MIS Projects: A Contingency ApproachHuman Relations, 30
P. Cheney, G. Dickson (1982)
Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems: An Exploratory InvestigationAcademy of Management Journal, 25
R. L. Nolan (1982)
Managing information systems by committeeManagement Science, 60
This study investigates organizational factors related to user involvement in information system development and perceived system usefulness. Using a sample of 118 usermanagers in 34 companies, the results show that user involvement in design and implementation is related positively to users' perceptions of system usefulness. However, organizational factors were not found to be related significantly to user involvement, as had been originally hypothesized. Rather, organizational factors either had a direct relationship with perceived usefulness or moderated the relationship between involvement and usefulness. Two factors reflecting an MIS department's maturity (size and age) were found to reduce users' perceptions of system usefulness. Also, users at higher levels and those making more structured decisions found their systems more useful, although the user's level was found to moderate perceptions of system usefulness during the design stage. Three other organizational factors (level of MIS manager, MIS department scope, and decentralization of authority) also were found to have moderating effects.
Decision Sciences – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 1986
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.