Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Dunn, D. Hussell, D. Welsh (1999)
Priority‐Setting Tool Applied to Canada's Landbirds Based on Concern and Responsibility for SpeciesConservation Biology, 13
R. Lande (1993)
Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random CatastrophesThe American Naturalist, 142
D. Green (2005)
Designatable Units for Status Assessment of Endangered SpeciesConservation Biology, 19
(1998)
Conservation assessment of the herpetofauna of India-an overview
Gärdenfors Gärdenfors, Rodríguez Rodríguez, Hilton‐Taylor Hilton‐Taylor, Hyslop Hyslop, Mace Mace, Molur Molur, Poss Poss (1999)
Draft guidelines for the application of IUCN Red List criteria at national and regional levelsSpecies, 31‐32
U. Gärdenfors (2001)
Classifying threatened species at national versus global levelsTrends in Ecology and Evolution, 16
P. Grammont, A. Cuarón (2006)
An Evaluation of Threatened Species Categorization Systems Used on the American ContinentConservation Biology, 20
D. Maes, L. Bruyn, E. Kuijken (2003)
Applying red list criteria in Flanders (North Belgium)
D. Mehlman, K. Rosenberg, J. Wells, Bruce Robertson (2004)
A comparison of North American avian conservation priority ranking systemsBiological Conservation, 120
Janice Golding, P. Hurter (2003)
A Red List account of Africa's cycads and implications of considering life-history and threatsBiodiversity & Conservation, 12
M. Eaton, R. Gregory, D. Noble, J. Robinson, J. Hughes, D. Procter, A. Brown, D. Gibbons (2005)
Regional IUCN Red Listing: the Process as Applied to Birds in the United KingdomConservation Biology, 19
L. Bennun, P. Njoroge, D. Pomeroy (2000)
Birds to watch: a Red Data List for East AfricaOstrich, 71
Keller Keller, Zbinden Zbinden, Schmid Schmid, Volet Volet (2005)
A case study in applying the IUCN “Regional Guidelines” for national red listsConservation Biology, 19
Bruno Pimenta, C. Haddad, L. Nascimento, C. Cruz, J. Pombal (2005)
Comment on "Status and Trends of Amphibian Declines and Extinctions Worldwide"Science, 309
(2005)
Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2005 -The 2005 red list of Swedish species. ArtDatabanken, The Swedish Species Information Centre
Joshua Ginsburg (2002)
The Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels
The Netherlands Commission for International Nature Protection, Leiden. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 1992. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
N. Collar (1996)
The reasons for Red Data BooksOryx, 30
F. Pinchera, L. Boitani, F. Corsi (1997)
Application to the terrestrial vertebrates of Italy of a system proposed by IUCN for a new classification of national Red List categoriesBiodiversity & Conservation, 6
Rebecca Miller, J. Rodríguez, Theresa Aniskowicz-Fowler, C. Bambaradeniya, R. Boles, M. Eaton, U. Gärdenfors, V. Keller, Sanjay Molur, S. Walker, C. Pollock (2006)
Extinction Risk and Conservation PrioritiesScience, 313
最首 太郎 (1999)
生物多様性条約 (Convention on Biological Diversity) 中間会合報告, 57
E. Milner‐Gulland, E. Kreuzberg-Mukhina, B. Grebot, S. Ling, E. Bykova, I. Abdusalamov, A. Bekenov, U. Gärdenfors, C. Hilton‐Taylor, V. Salnikov, L. Stogova (2006)
Application of IUCN Red Listing Criteria at the Regional and National Levels: A Case Study from Central AsiaBiodiversity & Conservation, 15
H. Akçakaya, S. Ferson, M. Burgman, D. Keith, G. Mace, C. Todd (2000)
Making Consistent IUCN Classifications under UncertaintyConservation Biology, 14
V. Keller, K. Bollmann (2004)
From Red Lists to Species of Conservation ConcernConservation Biology, 18
G. Mace, R. Lande (1991)
Assessing Extinction Threats: Toward a Reevaluation of IUCN Threatened Species CategoriesConservation Biology, 5
Julian O'Grady, D. Reed, B. Brook, R. Frankham (2004)
What are the best correlates of predicted extinction riskBiological Conservation, 118
IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission
F. Rojas-Suárez (1995)
Libro rojo de la fauna venezolana
M. Schnittler, K. Günther (1999)
Central European vascular plants requiring priority conservation measures – an analysis from national Red Lists and distribution mapsBiodiversity & Conservation, 8
H. Bauer (2003)
Red-Listing of birds in Germany, 38
J. Rodríguez, Gillian Ashenfelter, Franklin Rojas-Suárez, Juan Fernández, L. Suárez, A. Dobson (2000)
Local data are vital to worldwide conservationNature, 403
M. Avery, D. Gibbons, Richard Porter, T. Tew, G. Tucker, Gwyn Williams (2008)
Revising the British Red Data List for birds: the biological basis of U.K. conservation prioritiesIbis, 137
D. Maes, C. Swaay (1997)
A new methodology for compiling national Red Lists applied to butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) in Flanders (N-Belgium) and the NetherlandsJournal of Insect Conservation, 1
(2005)
Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria
S. Pimm, M. Ayres, A. Balmford, G. Branch, K. Brandon, T. Brooks, R. Bustamante, R. Costanza, R. Cowling, L. Curran, A. Dobson, S. Farber, G. Fonseca, C. Gascon, R. Kitching, J. Mcneely, T. Lovejoy, R. Mittermeier, N. Myers, J. Patz, B. Raffle, D. Rapport, P. Raven, C. Roberts, J. Rodríguez, A. Rylands, C. Tucker, C. Safina, C. Samper, M. Stiassny, J. Supriatna, D. Wall, D. Wilcove (2001)
Can We Defy Nature's End?Science, 293
(2003)
The context of red data books, with a complete bibliography of the IUCN publications
M. Samways (2002)
Red-listed Odonata of AfricaOdonatologica, 31
M. Patra, S. Acharjee, S. Chakraborty (2005)
Conservation categories of siluroid fishes in North-East Sundarbans, IndiaBiodiversity & Conservation, 14
John Lamoreux, H. Akçakaya, L. Bennun, N. Collar, L. Boitani, D. Brackett, Amie Bräutigam, T. Brooks, G. Fonseca, R. Mittermeier, A. Rylands, U. Gärdenfors, C. Hilton‐Taylor, G. Mace, B. Stein, S. Stuart (2003)
Value of the IUCN Red ListTrends in Ecology and Evolution, 18
D. Broughton, J. Mcadam (2002)
A Red Data List for the Falkland Islands vascular floraOryx, 36
A. Cuarón (1993)
Extinction rate estimatesNature, 366
(2005)
National Red List Advisory Group survey . Use of the IUCN Red List Criteria in national threatened species listing . Final report
M. Palmer, N. Hodgetts, M. Wigginton, B. Ing., N. Stewart (1997)
The application to the British flora of the World Conservation Union's revised red list criteria and the significance of red lists for species conservationBiological Conservation, 82
U. Gärdenfors, C. Hilton‐Taylor, G. Mace, J. Rodríguez (2001)
The Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional LevelsConservation Biology, 15
H. Possingham, S. Andelman, M. Burgman, R. Medellín, L. Master, D. Keith (2002)
Limits to the use of threatened species listsTrends in Ecology and Evolution, 17
D. Grigera, C. Úbeda (2002)
Una revisión de los trabajos sobre categorizaciones y prioridades de conservación de los vertebrados de Argentina, 12
V. Keller, Niklaus Zbinden, Hans Schmid, Bernard Volet (2005)
A Case Study in Applying the IUCN Regional Guidelines for National Red Lists and Justifications for their ModificationConservation Biology, 19
Rebecca Miller, J. Rodríguez, C. Bambaradeniya, R. Boles, M. Eaton, T. Fowler, U. Gärdenfors, V. Keller, Sanjay Molur, C. Pollock, S. Walker (2005)
Report from the National Red List Advisory Group Workshop "Analysis of the Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at a National Level" Villa Majagual, 21-26 January 2005
A. Rodrigues, J. Pilgrim, John Lamoreux, M. Hoffmann, T. Brooks (2006)
The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation.Trends in ecology & evolution, 21 2
D. Iongh, O. Bánki, W. Bergmans, der Van (2003)
The harmonization of Red Lists for threatened species in Europe
A. Randrianasolo, J. Miller, T. Consiglio (2002)
Application of IUCN criteria and Red List categories to species of five Anacardiaceae genera in MadagascarBiodiversity & Conservation, 11
K. Bollmann, V. Keller, W. Müller, Niklaus Zbinden (2002)
Prioritäre Vogelarten für Artenförderungsprogramme in der Schweiz, 99
J. Rodríguez, Franklin Rojas-Suárez, C. Sharpe (2004)
Setting priorities for the conservation of Venezuela's threatened birdsOryx, 38
R. Lande (1988)
Genetics and demography in biological conservation.Science, 241 4872
Abstract: As countries worldwide become increasingly interested in conserving biodiversity, the profile of national threatened species lists expands and these lists become more influential in determining conservation priorities. The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Categories and Criteria for evaluating extinction risk, originally intended for use at the global level, are increasingly being used at the national level. To facilitate this process, the IUCN recently published guidelines for the application of the criteria at subglobal levels. We evaluated the application of these guidelines, focusing on the opinions and experience of the global community of national assessors. To assess the extent to which IUCN criteria have been used in official national listing efforts, we sent a survey to 180 Convention on Biological Diversity national focal points designated by governments. Of the respondents, 77% had developed national threatened species lists. Of these, 78% applied a version of the IUCN criteria, and 88% plan to produce future threatened species lists. The majority of this last group (83%) will use IUCN criteria. Of the countries that have or will develop a threatened species list, 82% incorporated their list or the IUCN criteria into national conservation strategies. We further explored the issues highlighted by the survey results by integrating the experience of assessors that have produced national lists. Most of the problems national assessors faced when applying the IUCN criteria arose when the criteria were applied at the regional level without the IUCN Regional Guidelines and when assessors were confused about the purpose of the IUCN criteria and lacked training in their proper use. To improve their clarity and increase their repeatability, we recommend that the IUCN increase communication and information exchange among countries and between regional and global assessors, potentially through an interactive Web site, to facilitate the development of national red lists and to improve their conservation value within and between countries.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.