Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Active intestinal elimination of ciprofloxacin in rats: modulation by different substrates

Active intestinal elimination of ciprofloxacin in rats: modulation by different substrates Two in vivo models, in the rat, were used to investigate, in the presence of different substrates, the overall and net intestinal elimination of ciprofloxacin: an open‐intestinal perfusion model and an intestinal loop model respectively. In the presence of quinidine, verapamil and cyclosporin (substrates of the P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp)), plasma AUCs of ciprofloxacin were 1.5–2 fold increased, while biliary clearance (1.5–2 fold), intestinal overall and net clearances (2–4 fold and 1.5–8 fold respectively) decreased. The weak effect obtained with cyclosporin as compared to verapamil and especially quinidine, suggests, for ciprofloxacin, the existence of transport systems distinct from the P‐gp, as the OCT1 transporter which could be inhibited by quinidine. With cephalexin and azlocillin, two β‐lactam antibiotics, plasma AUCs of ciprofloxacin increased and biliary and intestinal overall clearances decreased in a similar fashion (1.3–2 fold), suggesting the involvement of organic anion and/or cation transporters. In the presence of structural analogues, the effect was dependent on the compound administered: Sparfloxacin had no effect on intestinal clearance of ciprofloxacin. In contrast, with pefloxacin, overall intestinal clearance of ciprofloxacin was decreased and net intestinal clearance increased. The specificity of ciprofloxacin intestinal transport appears to be different from P‐gp as outlined by the lack of competition with sparfloxacin, a P‐gp substrate. Ciprofloxacin intestinal elimination seems to be mediated by organic anion and/or cation transporters and a mechanism sensitive to quinidine and verapamil. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png British Journal of Pharmacology Wiley

Active intestinal elimination of ciprofloxacin in rats: modulation by different substrates

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/active-intestinal-elimination-of-ciprofloxacin-in-rats-modulation-by-Gw0U4MS66k

References (29)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Wiley Subscription Services
ISSN
0007-1188
eISSN
1476-5381
DOI
10.1038/sj.bjp.0702703
pmid
10455332
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Two in vivo models, in the rat, were used to investigate, in the presence of different substrates, the overall and net intestinal elimination of ciprofloxacin: an open‐intestinal perfusion model and an intestinal loop model respectively. In the presence of quinidine, verapamil and cyclosporin (substrates of the P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp)), plasma AUCs of ciprofloxacin were 1.5–2 fold increased, while biliary clearance (1.5–2 fold), intestinal overall and net clearances (2–4 fold and 1.5–8 fold respectively) decreased. The weak effect obtained with cyclosporin as compared to verapamil and especially quinidine, suggests, for ciprofloxacin, the existence of transport systems distinct from the P‐gp, as the OCT1 transporter which could be inhibited by quinidine. With cephalexin and azlocillin, two β‐lactam antibiotics, plasma AUCs of ciprofloxacin increased and biliary and intestinal overall clearances decreased in a similar fashion (1.3–2 fold), suggesting the involvement of organic anion and/or cation transporters. In the presence of structural analogues, the effect was dependent on the compound administered: Sparfloxacin had no effect on intestinal clearance of ciprofloxacin. In contrast, with pefloxacin, overall intestinal clearance of ciprofloxacin was decreased and net intestinal clearance increased. The specificity of ciprofloxacin intestinal transport appears to be different from P‐gp as outlined by the lack of competition with sparfloxacin, a P‐gp substrate. Ciprofloxacin intestinal elimination seems to be mediated by organic anion and/or cation transporters and a mechanism sensitive to quinidine and verapamil.

Journal

British Journal of PharmacologyWiley

Published: Jan 1, 1999

Keywords: ; ; ; ;

There are no references for this article.