Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Wang (1986)
Changes in psychophysiological and conditioning variables during chlormethiazole‐medicated and unmedicated ethanol withdrawal: preliminary reportActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 73
(1980)
Electrodermal acti~dty. In: Martin I, Venables PH (eds) Techniques in psychophysiolog5 ~
M. Frankenhaeuser, Gundla Järpe, H. Svan, B. Wrangsjö (1963)
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL REACTIONS TO TWO DIFFERENT PLACEBO TREATMENTSScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4
R. Pitman, S. Orr (1986)
Test of the conditioning model of neurosis: differential aversive conditioning of angry and neutral facial expressions in anxiety disorder patients.Journal of abnormal psychology, 95 3
A. Black (1978)
Functions of the septo-hippocampal systemNature, 271
J. Vila, H. Beech (1977)
Vulnerability and conditioning in relation to the human menstrual cycle.The British journal of social and clinical psychology, 16 1
J. Gray (1971)
The psychology of fear and stress
I. Maltzman, J. Gould, O. Barnett, D. Raskin, C. Wolff (1979)
Habituation of the GSR and digital vasomotor components of the orienting reflex as a consequence of task instructions and sex differencesPsychobiology, 7
H. Eysenck (1979)
The conditioning model of neurosisBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2
(1983)
Roles of serotonergic systems in escape, avoidance and others behavionrs
M. Horowitz (1989)
The Psychology of Fear and Stress, 2nd edAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 146
(1980)
Electrodermal acti ~ dty
J. Gray (1982)
Précis of The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal systemBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 5
Frederick Kopacz, Barry Smith (1971)
Sex differences in skin conductance measures as a function of shock threat.Psychophysiology, 8 3
J. Farha, K. Sher (1989)
The effects of consent procedures on the psychophysiological assessment of anxiety: a methodological inquiry.Psychophysiology, 26 2
A. Puigcerver, J. Martínez-Selva, F. García-Sánchez, J. Gómez-Amor (1989)
Individual differences in psychophysiological and subjective correlates of speech anxiety.Journal of Psychophysiology
D. Campbell, R. Sanderson, S. Laverty (1964)
CHARACTERISTICS OF A CONDITIONED RESPONSE IN HUMAN SUBJECTS DURING EXTINCTION TRIALS FOLLOWING A SINGLE TRAUMATIC CONDITIONING TRIAL.Journal of abnormal psychology, 68
J. Korn, K. Moyer (1968)
Effects of set and sex on the electrodermal orienting response.Psychophysiology, 4 4
213 104 104 2 2 F. S. Guimarães J. Hellewell R. Hensman M. Wang J. F. W. Deakin University Department of Psychiatry Withington Hospital M20 8RL Manchester UK Department of Pharmacology Faculty of Medicine, USP Ribeirao Preto, SP Brazil Department of Psychology University of Hull HU6 7RX UK Abstract Two experiments are described which evaluate the role of associative mechanisms and placebo effects on aversively conditioned skin conductance responses in groups of healthy volunteers. In both experiments, skin conductance level (SCL), variability (spontaneous fluctuations, SF) and amplitude (SCR) were recorded during a sequence of tone stimuli (80 dB, 1 s, 360 Hz). All the variables habituated during the first ten presentations of the tones. Tone 11 was immediately followed by a loud (100 dB) aversive brief (1 s) white noise UCS. The conditioning trial significantly enhanced SCRs to a further ten presentations of the tones and increased SCL and variability (SF). No enhancement of SCRs occurred when tone 11 was omitted and the UCS occurred in temporal isolation (experiment 1). Thus enhanced SCRs to tones following paired tone-noise presentation involves an associative mechanism. Increased “spontaneous” variability was shown to involve both conditioning and sensitization following the UCS. In both experiments females showed greater conditioned SCRs than males. In experiment 2 no effect of “anxiolytic” placebo could be discerned and there were no general relationships between questionnaires scores of extraversion or neuroticism with skin conductance measures in a group of 40 volunteers. The results question the role of conditionability and autonomic lability as major determinants of extraversion and neuroticism. These studies validate the use of the psychophysiological model of aversive conditioning in pharmacological studies of the mechanisms of habituation, conditioning and sensitization.
Psychopharmacology – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.