Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Reay
Non‐executive and expectation gap
C. Nobes, R. Parker (1981)
Comparative International Accounting
W. Boulton (1978)
The evolving board: a look at the board's changing roles and information needs.Academy of management review. Academy of Management, 3 4
W.H. Miller
Make it chairman and CEO
R.F. Vancil
Passing the Button: Managing the Process of CEO Succession
April Klein (1998)
Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure1The Journal of Law and Economics, 41
M. Conyon, Simon Peck (1998)
Board size and corporate performance: evidence from European countriesEuropean Journal of Finance, 4
James Brickley, J. Coles, G. Jarrell (1997)
Leadership Structure: Separating the CEO and Chairman of the BoardJournal of Corporate Finance, 3
Walter Salmon (1993)
Crisis prevention: how to gear up your board.Harvard business review, 71 1
N. O’Sullivan (2000)
THE IMPACT OF BOARD COMPOSITION AND OWNERSHIP ON AUDIT QUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM LARGE UK COMPANIES☆☆☆British Accounting Review, 32
E. Fama, M. Jensen (1983)
Separation of Ownership and ControlThe Journal of Law and Economics, 26
Michael Jensen, W. Meckling (1976)
Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control UnitLSN: Law & Finance: Empirical (Topic)
Rita Kosnik (1990)
Effects of Board Demography and Directors' Incentives on Corporate Greenmail DecisionsAcademy of Management Journal, 33
J. Fizel, Kenneth Louie (1990)
CEO retention, firm performance and corporate governanceManagerial and Decision Economics, 11
I. Millstein, Salem Katsh (2003)
The Limits of Corporate Power: Existing Constraints on the Exercise of Corporate Discretion
Anup Agrawal, C. Knoeber (1995)
Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and ShareholdersJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31
J. Aram, Scott Cowen (1983)
Information for Corporate Directors: The Role of the Board in the Management Process
Richard Fosberg (1989)
Outside Directors and Managerial Monitoring, 20
Hampel Report
Final Report of the Committee on Corporate Governance
B. Baysinger, R. Hoskisson (1990)
The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate StrategyAcademy of Management Review, 15
S.N. Abdullah
Utara Management Review
T. Nash
Do these men deliver?
M.C. Jensen, W.H. Meckling
Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure
Benjamin Hermalin, M. Weisbach (1988)
The Determinants of Board CompositionThe RAND Journal of Economics, 19
Rajeswararao Chaganti, V. Mahajan, Subhash Sharma (1985)
CORPORATE BOARD SIZE, COMPOSITION AND CORPORATE FAILURES IN RETAILING INDUSTRY[1]Journal of Management Studies, 22
B.R. Baliga, R.C. Moyer, R.S. Rao
Strategic Management Journal
A. Cadbury
Board Focus – The Governance Debate
B. Baliga, R. Moyer, R. Rao (1996)
CEO DUALITY AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: WHAT'S THE FUSS?Strategic Management Journal, 17
M. Mace (1971)
Directors: Myth and Reality
Stuart Rosenstein, Jeffrey Wyatt (1990)
Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth☆Journal of Financial Economics, 26
Rita Kosnik (1987)
Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate GovernanceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 32
D. Vicknair, K. Hickman, K.C. Carnes
A note on audit committee independence: evidence from NYSE on ‘grey’ area directors
Sanjai Bhagat, Bernard Black (1997)
The Uncertain Relationship between Board Composition and Firm PerformanceBusiness Lawyer, 54
M. Weisbach (1988)
Outside directors and CEO turnoverJournal of Financial Economics, 20
Paula Rechner (1989)
Corporate governance: Fact or fiction?Business Horizons, 32
Shorey Peterson, A. Berle, G. Means (1933)
The Modern Corporation and Private Property.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 28
Committee on Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (Cadbury Committee)
Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspect of Corporate Governance
Paula Rechner, D. Dalton (1991)
CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysisSouthern Medical Journal, 12
K. Keasey, M. Wright (1993)
Issues In Corporate Accountability and Governance: An EditorialAccounting and Business Research, 23
P. Pillai
Approaches to raising standards of corporate governance in Singapore
J. Zysman (1983)
Governments, Markets and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change
N.K. Daynton
Corporate governance: the other side of the coin
C.A. Anderson, R.N. Anthony
The New Corporate Directors
D. Yermack (1996)
Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directorsJournal of Financial Economics, 40
P.A. Stoeberl, B.C. Sherony
Board efficiency and effectiveness
Charles Waldo (1985)
Boards of Directors: Their Changing Roles, Structure, and Information Needs
Mark Beasley (1998)
An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud
Kala Anandarajah (2001)
Corporate governance : a practical approach
神崎 克郎 (1984)
The American Law Institute,Principle of Corporate Governance and Structure--Restatement and Recommendations,1982, 1983
D. Leighton, Garnet Garven (1996)
Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five CountriesJournal of International Business Studies, 27
M. Jensen (1993)
The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control SystemsCGA: Governance & Internal Control Systems (Topic)
Finance Committee on Corporate Governance
Report on Corporate Governance
Finance Committee on Corporate Governance
Malaysian code on corporate governance
S.V. Berg, S.K. Smith
CEO and board chairman: a quantitative study of dual vs. unitary board leadership
K. Peasnell, P. Pope, S. Young (2000)
Accrual management to meet earnings targets: UK evidence pre- and post-CadburyBritish Accounting Review, 32
American Law Institute
Principles of Corporate Governance and Structure: Restatement and Recommendations
Fathi Elloumi, Jean-Pierre Gueyié (2001)
Financial distress and corporate governance: an empirical analysisCorporate Governance, 1
J. Goodwin, Jean Seow (2000)
Corporate Governance in Singapore: Perceptions of Investors, Directors and AuditorsAccounting and Business Review, 7
M.N. Annuar, M. Shamsher
The wealth effect of appointments and resignations of board of directors
Omesh Kini, William Kracaw, Shehzad Mian (1995)
Corporate takeovers, firm performance, and board compositionJournal of Corporate Finance, 1
J.P. Perry
The Cadbury Committee and corporate governance in UK
J.H. Dobrzynski
Chairman and CEO: one hat too many
Philip Stiles, B. Taylor (1993)
Benchmarking corporate governance: The impact of the Cadbury CodeLong Range Planning, 26
A. Turner, H. Koontz (1969)
The board of directors and effective managementIndustrial and Labor Relations Review, 22
P. Mallette, K.L. Fowler
Effects of board composition and ownership structure on the adoption of ‘poison pills’
M. Bradbury, Y. Mak (2000)
Ownership structure, board composition and the adoption of charter takeover proceduresJournal of Corporate Finance, 6
M.C. Jensen
The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control mechanisms
William Clendenin (1972)
Company Presidents Look at the Board of DirectorsCalifornia Management Review, 14
S. Estrin, M. Brandon, K. Vagneur, M. Peiper (1998)
European boards of directors study
J. Lorsch, Jackie Young (1989)
Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards
This study investigates the roles of board independence and CEO duality on a firm’s performance relying on financial ratios, namely ROA, ROE, EPS and profit margin. This paper argues that if boards and leadership structure are well in place and conform to the practices in other developed countries, the long‐term shareholder value is expected to increase and shareholder interests are also well protected. To test the roles of board independence and CEO duality, data from the KLSE Main Board companies for the 1994‐1996 financial years were used. The 1994‐1996 financial years were chosen because, during this period, the issue of corporate governance in Malaysia was not as prominent as it was during, and after, the 1997/1998 financial crisis. Thus, this period could be considered as the period during which guidelines on the structure of the board of directors were not yet available in Malaysia. The findings, generally, suggest that neither board independence, leadership structure nor the joint effects of these two showed any relations with firm performance. Findings of this study, nonetheless, showed that Malaysian companies’ boards were generally dominated by outside directors and the majority of the companies in the study practiced non‐dual leadership structures. Thus, this evidence suggests that the structure of the boards of directors in Malaysia is largely independent of management and the absence of any dominant personality.
Corporate Governance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 2004
Keywords: Corporate governance; Boards of directors; Chief executives
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.