Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Cooper Cooper (Nov.Dec. 1990)
“New products: what distinguishes the winners,”Research and Technology Management
Rothwell Rothwell (1976)
“The ‘Hungarian SAPPHO’: some comments and comparison,”Research Policy, 3
Brentani Brentani (1986)
Do firms need a custom‐designed new product screening model?Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3
Hustad Hustad (March 1987)
“From the Editors”Journal of Product Innovation Management
Roberts Roberts, Berry Berry (Spring 1983)
“Entering new businesses: selecting strategies for success”Sloan Management Review
Rubenstein Rubenstein, Chakrabarti Chakrabarti, O'Keefe O'Keefe, Souder Souder, Young Young (May 1976)
“Factors influencing success at the project level”Research Management, 16
Cooper Cooper (1980)
“Project NewProd: factors in new product success”European Journal of Marketing, 14
Rothwell Rothwell, Freeman Freeman, Horseley Horseley, Jervis Jervis, Robertson Robertson, Townsend Townsend (1974)
“SAPPHO updated—Project SAPPHO Phase II”Research Policy, 3
Cooper Cooper (Summer 1979)
The dimensions of industrial new product success and failureJournal of Marketing, 43
Maidique Maidique, Zirger Zirger (Nov. 1984)
“A study of success and failure in product innovation: the case of the U.S. electronics industry”IEEE Trans. in Engineering Management
Cooper Cooper, Kleinschmidt Kleinschmidt (1987)
“New products: what separates winners from losers”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4
While many writers and strategists maintain that innovation is important, research has often demonstrated that product innovativeness does not have a major impact on the rate of success in the marketplace. Elko Kleinschmidt and Robert Cooper demonstrate that the relationship between product innovativeness and commercial success is U‐shaped. That means that both high and low innovativeness products are more likely to be more successful than those in‐between. The authors suggest that past research has not allowed for this non‐linear relationship and that their data show that moderately innovative, middle‐of‐the‐road products are less likely to succeed when measured by a number of performance criteria. They explore a number of implications of these results.
The Journal of Product Innovation Management – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.