Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Nei (1977)
F‐statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populationsAnnals of Human Genetics, 41
E. Bryant, L. Meffert (1996)
MORPHOMETRIC DIFFERENTIATION IN SERIALLY BOTTLENECKED POPULATIONS OF THE HOUSEFLYEvolution, 50
(1983)
The place of management in conservation
D. Briscoe, J. Malpica, A. Robertson, Gabrielle Smith, R. Frankham, R. Banks, J. Barker (1992)
Rapid Loss of Genetic Variation in Large Captive Populations of Drosophila Flies: Implications for the Genetic Management of Captive PopulationsConservation Biology, 6
Wenhao Li (1978)
Maintenance of Genetic Variability under the Joint Effect of Mutation, Selection and Random Drift.Genetics, 90 2
E. Bryant, L. Meffert (1990)
MULTIVARIATE PHENOTYPIC DIFFERENTIATION AMONG BOTTLENECK LINES OF THE HOUSEFLYEvolution, 44
(1990)
Midyear report-1990. American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquaria
S. Wright (1977)
Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Volume 3: Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions
S. McCommas, E. Bryant (1990)
Loss of electrophoretic variation in serially bottlenecked populationsHeredity, 64
R. Lande, D. Schemske (1985)
DEPRESSION IN PLANTS. I. GENETIC MODELS
S. Jain (1975)
GENETIC STRUCTURE OF POPULATIONS.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 29 2
(1991)
The effect of bottlenecks on genetic variation , fitness , and quantitative traits in the housefly
K. Ralls, J. Ballou (1986)
Preface to the proceedings of the workshop on genetic management of captive populationsZoo Biology, 5
E. Bryant (1977)
MORPHOMETRIC ADAPTATION OF THE HOUSEFLY, MUSCA DOMESTICA L., IN THE UNITED STATESEvolution, 31
Charles Sing, George Brewer, Barbara Thirtle (1973)
Inherited biochemical variation in Drosophila melanogaster: noise or signal? I. Single-locus analysis.Genetics, 75 2
D. Spielman, R. Frankham (1992)
Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: Improvement of reproductive fitness due to immigration of one individual into small partially inbred populationsZoo Biology, 11
T. Foose, J. Ballou (1987)
Management of small populationsInternational Zoo Yearbook, 27
(1987)
Species carrying capacity in zoos alone: a species selection masterplan
L. Mills, F. Allendorf (1996)
The One‐Migrant‐per‐Generation Rule in Conservation and ManagementConservation Biology, 10
M. Lynch, R. Lande (1998)
The critical effective size for a genetically secure populationAnimal Conservation, 1
P. Hedrick, C. Schonewald-Cox, S. Chambers, Bruce Macbryde, W. Thomas (1985)
Genetics and Conservation@@@Genetics and Conservation, A Reference for Managing Wild Animal and Plant Populations.Evolution, 39
S. Wright (1950)
Genetical structure of populations.Nature, 166 4215
Suzanne Borlase, D. Loebel, R. Frankham, R. Nurthen, D. Briscoe, G. Daggard (1993)
Modeling Problems in Conservation Genetics Using Captive Drosophila Populations: Consequences of Equalization of Family SizesConservation Biology, 7
J. Vucetich, T. Waite, L. Nunney (1997)
FLUCTUATING POPULATION SIZE AND THE RATIO OF EFFECTIVE TO CENSUS POPULATION SIZEEvolution, 51
I. Franklin, R. Frankham (1998)
How large must populations be to retain evolutionary potential?Animal Conservation, 1
L. Pray, C. Goodnight (1995)
GENETIC VARIATION IN INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN THE RED FLOUR BEETLE TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUMEvolution, 49
(1985)
Electrophroretic analysis of genetic variability in the housefly ( Musca domestica L . )
E. Bryant, L. Meffert (1993)
The effect of serial founder-flush cycles on quantitative genetic variation in the houseflyHeredity, 70
Frankham Frankham, Smith Smith, Briscoe Briscoe (1993)
Effects on heterozygosity and reproductive fitness of inbreeding with and without selection on fitness in Drosophila melanogaster .Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 86
Templeton Templeton, Read Read (1984)
Factors eliminating inbreeding depression in a captive herd of Speke's gazelle.Zoo Biology, 3
P. Hedrick (1995)
Gene Flow and Genetic Restoration: The Florida Panther as a Case Study.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 9 5
Edwin Bryant, S. McCommas, Lisa Combs (1986)
The Effect of an Experimental Bottleneck upon Quantitative Genetic Variation in the Housefly.Genetics, 114 4
V. Backus, E. Bryant, C. Hughes, L. Meffert (1995)
Effect of Migration or Inbreeding Followed by Selection on Low-Founder-Number Populations: Implications for Captive Breeding Programs.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 9 5
B. Latter, J. Mulley, D. Reid, L. Pascoe (1995)
Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics, 139 1
C. Tudge (1991)
Last Animals at the Zoo: How Mass Extinction Can Be Stopped
(1986)
Extinctions : lessons from zoos
M. Nei, T. Maruyama, R. Chakraborty (1975)
THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT AND GENETIC VARIABILITY IN POPULATIONSEvolution, 29
(1992)
Annual report on conservation and science
Frankham Frankham (1995)
Conservation genetics.Annual Review Genetics, 29
U. Seal, T. Foose (1983)
Development of a masterplan for captive propagation of Siberian tigers in North American ZoosZoo Biology, 2
E. Bryant (1969)
The Fates of Immatures in Mixtures of Two Housefly StrainsEcology, 50
R. O’brien (1981)
A simple test for variance effects in experimental designs.Psychological Bulletin, 89
S. Wright (1931)
Evolution in Mendelian Populations.Genetics, 16 2
W. Rumball, I. Franklin, R. Frankham, B. Sheldon (1994)
Decline in heterozygosity under full-sib and double first-cousin inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics, 136 3
A. Templeton, B. Read (1984)
Factors eliminating inbreeding depression in a captive herd of speke's gazelle (Gazella spekei)Zoo Biology, 3
R. Lande, G. Barrowclough (1987)
Viable Populations for Conservation: Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management
P. Hedrick (1994)
Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib matingHeredity, 73
Frankham Frankham (1995)
Effective population size/adult population ratios in wildlife: a review.Genetical Research, Cambridge, 66
McCommas McCommas, Bryant Bryant (1990)
Loss of electrophoretic variation in experimentally bottlenecked populations.Heredity, 64
(1996)
Quantitative genetics. Longman
R. Lande, D. Schemske (1985)
THE EVOLUTION OF SELF‐FERTILIZATION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS. I. GENETIC MODELSEvolution, 39
D. Loebel, R. Nurthen, R. Frankham, D. Briscoe, Duncan Craven (1992)
Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: Consequences of equalizing founder representationZoo Biology, 11
R. Frankham (1996)
Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlifeConservation Biology, 10
(1983)
Genetics and demography of the Siberian tiger in North America with evidence of inbreeding depression
Borlase Borlase, Loebel Loebel, Frankham Frankham, Nurthen Nurthen, Briscoe Briscoe (1993)
Modeling problems in conservation genetics using Drosophila populations: consequences of equalizing family sizes.Conservation Biology, 7
K. Willis, R. Wiese (1993)
Effect of new founders on retention of gene diversity in captive populations: A formalization of the nucleus population conceptZoo Biology, 12
R. Lande (1988)
Genetics and demography in biological conservation.Science, 241 4872
Abstract: Several captive breeding regimes were compared for their ability to maintain fitness ( larval viability) and genetic variation in small populations of the housefly ( Musca domestica L.). Populations were either maintained at constant sizes of 40, 200, or 2000 individuals or initiated with two pairs of flies and allowed to grow to 40 individuals ( low‐founder‐number populations). Low‐founder‐number populations without migration exhibited low larval viability (22%) after 24 generations, compared to larger populations maintained at either 200 (49%) or 2000 (69%) individuals, and suffered high extinction, with only 44% of the lines surviving 24 generations. Low‐founder‐number populations subjected to two additional founder ( bottleneck) episodes, reducing them to two pairs of flies, suffered little additional loss in fitness or extinction compared to the single‐founder treatments. Migration as low as one individual per generation (2.5% migration) significantly offset both reduced fitness and rate of extinction. Conversely, fitness was not significantly increased for low‐founder‐number populations when founders were selected from the top performing 20% of pairs under full‐sib mating. Populations maintained at 40 individuals were not sustainable, exhibiting low larval viability (35%) and a high extinction rate (40%) over 24 generations, similar to the extinction rates for populations initiated with only four founders. Although none of the populations maintained at 200 individuals went extinct, their fitness was reduced by 20% compared to a large control population maintained at 2000 individuals. Electrophoretic variation was significantly correlated with fitness across treatments, but the correlation of fitness to narrow‐sense heritability of two morphometric traits was not significant.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.