Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Burgoon, Deborah Coker, Ray Coker (1986)
Communicative effects of gaze behavior: a test of two contrasting explanationsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 12
N. Henley, S. Harmon (1985)
The Nonverbal Semantics of Power and Gender: A Perceptual Study
E. Sundstrom, I. Altman (1976)
Interpersonal relationships and personal space: Research review and theoretical modelHuman Ecology, 4
Burgoon Burgoon, Aho Aho (1982)
Three field experiments on the effects of conversational distanceCommunication Monographs, 49
G. Weisfeld, H. Linkey (1985)
Dominance Displays as Indicators of a Social Success Motive
J. Burgoon, Jerold Hale (1988)
Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviorsCommunication Monographs, 55
André Lafrance (1990)
Les pouvoirs individuels dans les communications organisationnellesCommunicatio, 11
J. Fisher, M. Rytting, R. Heslin (1976)
Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch.Sociometry, 39 4
B. MacWhinney, J. Keenan, Peter Reinke (1982)
The role of arousal in memory for conversationMemory & Cognition, 10
Deborah Stier, Judith Hall (1984)
Gender Differences in Touch: An Empirical and Theoretical ReviewJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47
E. Tolman (1949)
There is more than one kind of learning.Psychological review, 56 3
E. Cadotte, R. Woodruff, R. Jenkins (1987)
Expectations and norms in models of consumer satisfaction.Journal of Marketing Research, 24
Burgoon Burgoon, Coker Coker, Coker Coker (1986)
Communicative effects of gaze behavior: A test of two contrasting explanationsHuman Communication Research, 12
Burgoon Burgoon, Stacks Stacks, Burch Burch (1982)
The role of interpersonal rewards and violations of distancing expectations in achieving influence in small groupsCommunication, 11
Donna Thompson, J. Aiello, Y. Epstein (1979)
Interpersonal distance preferencesJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 4
J. Burgoon (1978)
A Communication Model of Personal Space Violations: Explication and an Initial Test.Human Communication Research, 4
M. Dimatteo (1981)
Toward understanding relationships: byRobert A. Hinde, Academic, London, 1979. 367 pp. $18.00Social Science & Medicine. Part C: Medical Economics, 15
M. Sirgy (1984)
A social cognition model of consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction an experimentPsychology & Marketing, 1
A. Mehrabian (1970)
A semantic space for nonverbal behavior.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35
Thomas Housel, Stephen Acker (1979)
Schema Theory: Can It Connect Communication's Discourse?.
N. Henley (1973)
Status and sex: Some touching observationsBulletin of the psychonomic society, 2
J. Burgoon, Deborah Newton (1991)
Applying a social meaning model to relational message interpretations of conversational involvement: Comparing observer and participant perspectivesThe Southern Communication Journal, 56
R. Street, J. Wiemann, A. Mulac (1988)
Speech Evaluation Differences as a Function of Perspective (Participant Versus Observer) and Presentational MediumHuman Communication Research, 14
J. Burgoon, D. Buller, Jerold Hale, M. Turck (1984)
Relational Messages Associated with Nonverbal Behaviors.Human Communication Research, 10
H. Eysenck, C. Hull (1954)
A Behavior SystemBritish Journal of Sociology, 5
S. Planalp (1985)
Relational schemata: A test of alternative forms of relational knowledge as guides to communication.Human Communication Research, 12
J. Cappella (1981)
Mutual influence in expressive behavior: adult--adult and infant--adult dyadic interaction.Psychological bulletin, 89 1
R. Schank, R. Abelson (1988)
SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING
D. Dunkerley (1970)
The Measurement of Social NormsInternational Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1
J. Burgoon, L. Aho (1982)
Three field experiments on the effects of violations of conversational distanceCommunication Monographs, 49
P. Ellsworth, L. Ludwig (1972)
Visual Behavior in Social InteractionJournal of Communication, 22
R. Baron (1978)
Invasions of personal space and helping: Mediating effects of invader's apparent need ☆Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14
N. Henley (1977)
Body Politics: Power, Sex, and Nonverbal Communication
Kathy Kellermann (1984)
The negativity effect and its implications for initial interactionCommunication Monographs, 51
C. Huberty, John Morris (1989)
Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses.Psychological Bulletin, 105
E. Rosa, A. Mazur (1979)
Incipient Status in Small GroupsSocial Forces, 58
R. Harper (1985)
Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior: An Overview
H. Friedman, M. Patterson (1984)
Nonverbal Behavior: A Functional Perspective.Contemporary Sociology, 13
Milton Bloombaum, E. Goffman (1962)
Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction.American Sociological Review, 27
J. Burgoon, D. Stacks, W. Woodall (1979)
A communicative model of violations of distancing expectationsWestern Journal of Speech Communication, 43
C. Berger, R. Calabrese (1975)
SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATIONHuman Communication Research, 1
G. Moss, B. Schlenker (1987)
The Self and social lifeContemporary Sociology, 16
Dean Hewes, S. Planalp (1982)
There is nothing as useful as a good theory: The influence of social knowledge on interpersonal communication
P. Green, B. Winer, Donald Brown, K. Michels (1963)
Statistical Principles in Experimental Design
Jackson Jackson (1966)
A conceptual and measurement model for norms and rolesPacific Sociological Review, 9
I. Altman, Anne Vinsel (1977)
Personal Space: An Analysis of E.T. Hall’s Proxemics Framework
A. Mehrabian (1968)
Inference of attitudes from the posture, orientation, and distance of a communicator.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 32 3
J. Hilton, J. Darley (1985)
Constructing other persons: A limit on the effectJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21
C. Hull (1944)
Principles of BehaviorJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 101
Stanley Jones, A. Yarbrough (1985)
A naturalistic study of the meanings of touchCommunication Monographs, 52
J. Burgoon, S. Jones (1976)
TOWARD A THEORY OF PERSONAL SPACE EXPECTATIONS AND THEIR VIOLATIONSHuman Communication Research, 2
R. Rosenthal, R. Rosnow (1985)
Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance
G. Staines (1986)
Six – Men and Women in Role Relationships
A. Leffler, D. Gillespie, J. Conaty (1982)
The Effects of Status Differentiation on Nonverbal BehaviorSocial Psychology Quarterly, 45
R. Hinde (1979)
Towards understanding relationships
Sirgy Sirgy (1984)
A social cognition model of consumer satisfaction/dissatisfactionPsychology & Marketing, 1
E. Tolman (1932)
Purposive behavior in animals and men
C. Silverthorne, J. Micklewright, M. O'Donnell, Richard Gibson (1976)
Attribution of personal characteristics as a function of the degree of touch on initial contact and sexSex Roles, 2
Kathy Kellermann (1986)
Anticipation of Future Interaction and Information Exchange in Initial InteractionHuman Communication Research, 13
J. Burgoon, V. Manusov, Paul Mineo, Jerold Hale (1985)
Effects of gaze on hiring, credibility, attraction and relational message interpretationJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9
J. Cappella, John Greene (1982)
A discrepancy‐arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant‐adult interaction 1Communication Monographs, 49
Thomas Baglan, Dennis Nelson (1982)
A Comparison of the Effects of Sex and Status on the Perceived Appropriateness of Nonverbal BehaviorsWomen's Studies in Communication, 5
Julia Wood (1982)
Communication and relational culture: Bases for the study of human relationshipsCommunication Quarterly, 30
L. Dean, F. Willis, J. Hewitt (1975)
Initial interaction distance among individuals equal and unequal in military rank.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32
R. Sabatelli, Michael Rubin (1986)
Nonverbal expressiveness and physical attractiveness as mediators of interpersonal perceptionsJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10
J. Jackson (1966)
A Conceptual and Measurement Model for Norms and RolesSociological Perspectives, 9
J. Burgoon, Deborah Newton, J. Walther, E. Baesler (1988)
Nonverbal expectancy violations and conversational involvementJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13
D. Buller, J. Burgoon (1986)
The Effects of Vocalics and Nonverbal Sensitivity on Compliance A Replication and ExtensionHuman Communication Research, 13
D. Wegner, Robin Vallacher (1977)
Implicit Psychology: An Introduction to Social Cognition
R. Mcfarland, C. Knehr, C. Berens (1937)
The effects of oxygen deprivation on eye movements in readingJournal of Experimental Psychology, 21
Diana Summerhayes, Robert Suchner (1978)
Power implications of touch in male—Female relationshipsSex Roles, 4
(1981)
Schematic bases of social information processing
E. Jones, R. Nisbett (1972)
The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior.
D. Lott, R. Sommer (1967)
Seating arrangements and status.Journal of personality and social psychology, 7 1
D. Rumelhart (1984)
Schemata and the cognitive system.
E. Goffman (1959)
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
H. Rosenfeld, B. Breck, Stephanie Smith, S. Kehoe (1984)
Intimacy-mediators of the proximity-gaze compensation effect: Movement, conversational role, acquaintance, and genderJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8
This report reviews the construct of expectancy and its relevance to understanding communication phenomena. Given the shortage of empirically based knowledge about what constitute expected and unexpected interpersonal behaviors and how they are evaluated, a two‐part experiment was conducted to determine the expectedness and evaluation of three nonverbal variables: touch, conversational distance, and posture. The possible moderating effects of communicator attractiveness, status, and gender were also examined. Respondents (N = 622) viewed photographs of an attractive or unattractive male or female stimulus interacting with a male or female partner, attributed to be of same, higher, or lower status, who displayed one of seven forms of touch or one of nine combinations of posture and proximity. Respondents rated the appropriateness, typicality, and desirability of the observed behavior. Results demonstrated that several behaviors are expected and positively valenced, while others qualify as positive or negative violations of expectations. Attractiveness influenced expectancies and evaluations; gender and status had limited effects. Implications for information processing and nonverbal expectancy violations theory are discussed.
Human Communication Research – Oxford University Press
Published: Dec 1, 1990
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.