Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Kaiser (1998)
New Wetlands Proposal Draws FlakScience, 279
A. Noordwijk (1988)
Futuyma, D. J. 1986. Evolutionary Biology 2nd edition, Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, Mass.Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 1
Carmen Domingo (1929)
BiologyNature, 123
J. Wiens (1997)
Long-term studies of vertebrate communitiesTrends in Ecology and Evolution, 12
A. Blaustein, D. Wake (1990)
Declining amphibian populations: A global phenomenon?Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5
Gibbs Gibbs (1993)
Importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland‐associated animalsWetlands, 13
James Brown, A. Kodric‐Brown (1977)
Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on ExtinctionEcology, 58
J. Wiest (1974)
Anuran succession at temporary ponds in a post oak savannah region of Texas
R. Semlitsch (1998)
Biological Delineation of Terrestrial Buffer Zones for Pond‐Breeding SalamandersConservation Biology, 12
R. Ricklefs, D. Schluter (1993)
Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives.
David Smith (1983)
Factors Controlling Tadpole Populations of the Chorus Frog (Pseudacris Triseriata) on Isle Royale, MichiganEcology, 64
J. Gibbons, R. Semlitsch (1982)
TERRESTRIAL DRIFT FENCES WITH PITFALL TRAPS AN EFFECTIVE TECHNIQUE FOR QUANTITATIVE SAMPLING OF ANIMAL POPULATIONS, 7
Dodd Dodd (1992)
Biological diversity of a temporary pond herpetofauna in north Florida sandhillsBiodiversity and Conservation, 1
R. Semlitsch, D. Scott, Joseph Pechmann, J. Gibbons (1996)
CHAPTER 9 – Structure and Dynamics of an Amphibian Community: Evidence from a 16-Year Study of a Natural Pond
Wildlife values of small , isolated wetlands in the southeastern coastal plain
Ron Pulliam (1988)
Sources, Sinks, and Population RegulationThe American Naturalist, 132
(1997)
Dynamics of the amphibian communities at two small ponds in Land Between the Lakes over the past decade
(1133)
Semlitsch & Bodie Expendability of Small Wetlands
D. Gill (1978)
The Metapopulation Ecology of the Red‐Spotted Newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque)Ecological Monographs, 48
Stéphane Boissinot, S. Shyue (2000)
Evolutionary Biology
Kirkman Kirkman, Lide Lide, Wein Wein, Sharitz Sharitz (1996)
Vegetation changes and land‐use legacies of depression wetlands of the western coastal plain of South Carolina: 1951–1992Wetlands, 16
P. Morin (1983)
Predation, Competition, and the Composition of Larval Anuran GuildsEcological Monographs, 53
J. Gibbons, D. Bennett (1974)
Determination of Anuran Terrestrial Activity Patterns by a Drift Fence MethodCopeia, 1974
R. Sharitz, J. Gibbons (1982)
Ecology of southeastern shrub bogs (pocosins) and Carolina bays: a community profile
(1987)
The anisoptera of the Savannah River Plant South Carolina U.S.A. thirty years later
P. Wagner (1999)
Aquatic Fauna in Peril: The Southeastern Perspective. George W. Benze , David E. Collins
(1994)
The ecology of seven rare wetland species in Carolina bays and bay-like depressions in the western Coastal Plain of South Carolina
Dodd Dodd, Cade Cade (1998)
Movement patterns and the conservation of breeding amphibians in small, temporary wetlandsConservation Biology, 12
D. Mahoney, M. Mort, B. Taylor (1990)
Species Richness of Calanoid Copepods, Cladocerans and Other Branchiopods in Carolina Bay Temporary PondsAmerican Midland Naturalist, 123
J. Pounds, M. Crump (1994)
Amphibian declines and climate disturbance: the case of the golden toad and the harlequin frogConservation Biology, 8
H. Wilbur (1987)
Regulation of Structure in Complex Systems: Experimental Temporary Pond CommunitiesEcology, 68
J. Schalles, R. Sharitz, J. Gibbons, G. Leversee, J. Knox (1989)
Carolina bays of the Savannah River Plant
T. Burton, G. Likens (1975)
Salamander populations and biomass in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New HampshireCopeia, 3
Pechmann Pechmann, Scott Scott, Gibbons Gibbons, Semlitsch Semlitsch (1989)
Influence of wetland hydroperiod on diversity and abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibiansWetlands Ecology and Management, 1
A. Blaustein, D. Wake, W. Sousa (1994)
Amphibian Declines: Judging Stability, Persistence, and Susceptibility of Populations to Local and Global ExtinctionsConservation Biology, 8
K. Berven, T. Grudzien (1990)
DISPERSAL IN THE WOOD FROG (RANA SYLVATICA): IMPLICATIONS FOR GENETIC POPULATION STRUCTUREEvolution, 44
C. Dodd, B. Cade (1998)
Movement Patterns and the Conservation of Amphibians Breeding in Small, Temporary WetlandsConservation Biology, 12
(1994)
Calibrating our expectations in studying amphibian declines
What is most evident in the recent debate concerning new wetland regulations drafted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is that small, isolated wetlands will likely continue to be lost. The critical biological question is whether small wetlands are expendable, and the fundamental issue is the lack of biologically relevant data on the value of wetlands, especially so‐called “isolated” wetlands of small size. We used data from a geographic information system for natural‐depression wetlands on the southeastern Atlantic coastal plain (U.S.A.) to examine the frequency distribution of wetland sizes and their nearest‐wetland distances. Our results indicate that the majority of natural wetlands are small and that these small wetlands are rich in amphibian species and serve as an important source of juvenile recruits. Analyses simulating the loss of small wetlands indicate a large increase in the nearest‐wetland distance that could impede “rescue” effects at the metapopulation level. We argue that small wetlands are extremely valuable for maintaining biodiversity, that the loss of small wetlands will cause a direct reduction in the connectance among remaining species populations, and that both existing and recently proposed legislation are inadequate for maintaining the biodiversity of wetland flora and fauna. Small wetlands are not expendable if our goal is to maintain present levels of species biodiversity. At the very least, based on these data, regulations should protect wetlands as small as 0.2 ha until additional data are available to compare diversity directly across a range of wetland sizes. Furthermore, we strongly advocate that wetland legislation focus not only on size but also on local and regional wetland distribution in order to protect ecological connectance and the source‐sink dynamics of species populations. Son los Humedales Pequeños Prescindibles? Algo muy evidente en el reciente debate sobre las nuevas regulaciones de humedales elaboradas por el cuerpo de ingenieros de la armada de los Estados Unidos es que los humedales aislados pequeños seguramente se continuarán perdiendo. La pregunta biológica crítica es si los humedales pequeños son prescindibles y e asunto fundamental es la falta de datos biológicos relevantes sobre el valor de los humedales, especialmente los llamados humedales “aislados” de tamaño pequeño. Utilizamos datos de GIS para humedales de depresiones naturales en la planicie del sureste de la costa Atlántica (U.S.A.) para examinar la distribución de frecuencias de los tamaños de humedales y las distancias a los humedales mas cercanos. Nuestros resultados indican que la mayoría de los humedales naturales son pequeños y que estos humedales pequeños son ricos en especies de anfibios y sirven como una fuente importante de reclutas juveniles. Análisis simulando la pérdida de humedales pequeños indican un gran incremento en la distancia al humedal mas cercano lo cual impediría efectos de “rescate” a nivel de metapoblación. Argumentamos que los humedales pequeños son extremadamente valiosos para el mantenimiento de la biodiversidad, que la pérdida de humedales pequeños causará una reducción directa en la conexión entre poblaciones de especies remanentes y que tanto la legislación propuesta como la existente son inadecuadas para mantener la biodiversidad de la flora y fauna de los humedales. Si nuestra meta es mantener los niveles actuales de biodiversidad de especies, los humedales pequeños no son prescindibles. En base en estos datos, las regulaciones deberían por lo menos proteger humedales tan pequeños como 0.2 ha hasta que se tengan a la mano datos adicionales para comparar directamente la diversidad a lo largo de un rango de humedales de diferentes tamaños. Mas aún, abogamos fuertemente por que la regulación de los pantanos se enfoque no solo en el tamaño, sino también en la distribución local y regional de los humedales para poder proteger la conexión ecológica y las dinámicas fuente y sumidero de poblaciones de especies.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Oct 5, 1998
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.