Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/combining-population-viability-analysis-with-decision-analysis-DQDNrCGYC4
References (81)
-
Jacob Cohen (1994)
The earth is round (p < .05)American Psychologist, 49
-
P. Murtaugh (1996)
The Statistical Evaluation of Ecological IndicatorsEcological Applications, 6
-
JunJie Wu, W. Boggess (1999)
The optimal allocation of conservation fundsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38
-
M. Burgman, D. Breininger, Brean Duncan, S. Ferson (2001)
SETTING RELIABILITY BOUNDS ON HABITAT SUITABILITY INDICESEcological Applications, 11
-
O. Tahvonen (1995)
Dynamics of pollution control when damage is sensitive to the rate of pollution accumulationEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 5
-
R. Hilborn, D. Ludwig (1993)
The Limits of Applied Ecological Research.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 3 4
-
(1994)
ATLSS: Across-Trophic-Level System Simulation for the Freshwater Wetlands of the Everglades and Big Cypress Swamp -
(1976)
Theoretical Ecology. Blackwell -
R. Hilborn, C. Walters (2004)
Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics and uncertaintyReviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2
-
M. Goldstein, C. Howson, P. Urbach (1993)
9. Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian ApproachJournal of The Royal Statistical Society Series A-statistics in Society, 156
-
J. Kidd (1983)
Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiassesJournal of the Operational Research Society, 34
-
H. Bjornsson, D. Fletcher, B. Manly (1996)
Statistics in Ecology and Environmental Monitoring.Biometrics, 52
-
Anthony Smith, K. Sainsbury, R. Stevens (1999)
Implementing effective fisheries-management systems – management strategy evaluation and the Australian partnership approachJournal of Materials Science, 56
-
R. Greenberg (1969)
BiometryThe Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 42
-
M.A. Burgman (2000)
Population viability analysis for bird conservation: theory, practice, models and psychologyEmu, 100
-
R. Peterman (1990)
Statistical Power Analysis can Improve Fisheries Research and ManagementCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 47
-
A. Punt, R. Hilborn (1997)
Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approachReviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 7
-
M.S. Boyce (1992)
Population viability analysisAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23
-
(1994)
IUCN IUCN Red List Categories. Species Survival Commission. IUCN -
R. Pressey, C. Humphries, C. Margules, R. Vane-Wright, P. Williams (1993)
Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection.Trends in ecology & evolution, 8 4
-
M. Drechsler, Frank Wätzold (2001)
The importance of economic costs in the development of guidelines for spatial conservation managementBiological Conservation, 97
-
M. Drechsler (2000)
A model-based decision aid for species protection under uncertaintyBiological Conservation, 94
-
P. Wade (2000)
Bayesian Methods in Conservation BiologyConservation Biology, 14
-
O. Klepper (1997)
Multivariate aspects of model uncertainty analysis: tools for sensitivity analysis and calibrationEcological Modelling, 101
-
H. Akçakaya, S. Ferson, M. Burgman, D. Keith, G. Mace, C. Todd (2000)
Making Consistent IUCN Classifications under UncertaintyConservation Biology, 14
-
D. Ludwig, R. Hilborn, C. Walters (1993)
Uncertainty, Resource Exploitation, and Conservation: Lessons from History.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 3 4
-
(2008)
Conservation Ecology: Embracing uncertainty: The interface of Bayesian statistics and cognitive psychology -
H. Akçakaya, J. Atwood (1997)
A Habitat‐Based Metapopulation Model of the California GnatcatcherConservation Biology, 11
-
T. Stewart (1992)
A CRITICAL SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING THEORY AND PRACTICEOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 20
-
(1994)
IUCN Red List Categories. Species Survival Commission -
R. Clemen (1997)
Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis -
(1994)
IUCN Red List Categories -
K. Ralls, A. Starfield (1995)
Choosing a Management Strategy: Two Structured Decision‐Making Methods for Evaluating the Predictions of Stochastic Simulation ModelsConservation Biology, 9
-
M. Burgman, B. Lamont (1992)
A stochastic model for the viability of Banksia cuneata populations : environmental, demographic and genetic effectsJournal of Applied Ecology, 29
-
S. Richards, H. Possingham, James Tizard (1999)
OPTIMAL FIRE MANAGEMENT FOR MAINTAINING COMMUNITY DIVERSITYEcological Applications, 9
-
P. Thompson, B. Wilson, K. Grellier, P. Hammond (2000)
Combining Power Analysis and Population Viability Analysis to Compare Traditional and Precautionary Approaches to Conservation of Coastal CetaceansConservation Biology, 14
-
N. Hanley, C. Spash (1993)
Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Environment -
K. Gadow, T. Pukkala, M. Tomé (2000)
Sustainable Forest Management -
M. Drechsler (1998)
Sensitivity analysis of complex modelsBiological Conservation, 86
-
R. Falk, C. Greenbaum (1995)
Significance Tests Die HardTheory & Psychology, 5
-
H. Possingham (1996)
Frontiers of Population Ecology -
M. Burgman (2000)
Population Viability Analysis for Bird Conservation: Prediction, Heuristics, Monitoring and PsychologyEmu - Austral Ornithology, 100
-
(1990)
Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid -
R. Macdonald (1997)
On statistical testing in psychologyBritish Journal of Psychology, 88
-
M. Drechsler (2004)
Model-based Conservation Decision Aiding in the Presence of Goal Conflicts and UncertaintyBiodiversity & Conservation, 13
-
H. Regan, M. Colyvan, M. Burgman (2000)
A proposal for fuzzy International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) categories and criteriaBiological Conservation, 92
-
A. Rosenberg, M. Fogarty, M. Sissenwine, J. Beddington, J. Shepherd (1993)
Achieving sustainable use of renewable resources.Science, 262 5135
-
R. O’Hara, E. Arjas, Hannu Toivonen, I. Hanski (2002)
BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF METAPOPULATION DATAEcology, 83
-
G. Caughley (1994)
Directions in conservation biologyJournal of Animal Ecology, 63
-
J. Gill (1999)
The Insignificance of Null Hypothesis Significance TestingPolitical Research Quarterly, 52
-
Douglas Johnson (1999)
The Insignificance of Statistical Significance TestingJournal of Wildlife Management, 63
-
Baruch Fischhoff, P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein (1982)
Lay Foibles and Expert Fables in Judgments about RiskThe American Statistician, 36
-
M. Morgan, M. Henrion (1990)
Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis -
H. Possingham, C. Shea (1999)
The Business of BiodiversityAustralian Zoologist, 31
-
B. Mapstone (1995)
Scalable Decision Rules for Environmental Impact Studies: Effect Size, Type I, and Type II ErrorsEcological Applications, 5
-
H. Possingham (1996)
Decision Theory and Biodiversity Management: How to manage a metapopulation -
H. Caswell (1978)
A general formula for the sensitivity of population growth rate to changes in life history parameters.Theoretical population biology, 14 2
-
M. Drechsler, M. Burgman, P. Menkhorst (1998)
Uncertainty in population dynamics and its consequences for the management of the orange-bellied parrot Neophema chrysogasterBiological Conservation, 84
-
D. Fox (2001)
Environmental power analysis – a new perspectiveEnvironmetrics, 12
-
R.M. May (1976)
Theoretical Ecology -
C. Howson, P. Urbach (1989)
Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach -
G. Hartvigsen, A. Gutierrez (1997)
Applied Population EcologyEcology, 78
-
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1981)
The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science, 211 4481
-
P. Meehl (1978)
Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46
-
L. Eeckhoudt, C. Gollier, Val Lambson, D. Kessler (1996)
Risk: Evaluation, Management and Sharing -
(1995)
Things environmental scientists (and statisticians) need to know to receive (and give) better statistical advice -
A. Gelman, J.B. Carlin, H.S. Stern, D.B. Rubin (1995)
Bayesian Data Analysis -
P. Fairweather (1991)
Statistical Power and Design Requirements for Environmental MonitoringMarine and Freshwater Research, 42
-
N. Hanley, C.L. Spash (1993)
Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment (Chapter 1) -
M. Kamrin, J. Lemons (1997)
Scientific Uncertainty and Environmental Problem SolvingBioScience
-
J. Becker, D. Kuhn (1984)
Judgements under uncertainty: Heuristics and biasesNew Ideas in Psychology, 2
-
T. Page (1977)
Discounting and intergenerational equityFutures, 9
-
(1986)
Using decision analysis to manage endangered species populations -
D. Bakan (1966)
The test of significance in psychological research.Psychological bulletin, 66 6
-
A. Lombard, A. Nicholls, P. August (1995)
Where Should Nature Reserves Be Located in South Africa? A Snake's PerspectiveConservation Biology, 9
-
C.R. Margules, A.O. Nicholls (1993)
Conservation Biology in Australia and Oceania -
K. Gutzwiller (2002)
Applying Landscape Ecology in Biological Conservation -
S. Ferson, M. Burgman (2002)
Quantitative Methods for Conservation BiologyEcology
-
C. Howson (1998)
The Bayesian Approach -
J.L. Anderson (1998)
Embracing uncertainty: the interface of Bayesian statistics and cognitive psychologyConservation Ecology [online], 2
-
J. Cohen (1988)
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2004 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Subject
- Life Sciences; Evolutionary Biology; Tree Biology; Plant Sciences
- ISSN
- 0960-3115
- eISSN
- 1572-9710
- DOI
- 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000004315.09433.f6
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Management of endangered species requires methods to assess the effects of strategies, providing a basis for deciding on a best course of action. An important component of assessment is population viability analysis (PVA). The latter may be formally implemented through decision analysis (DA). These methods are most useful for conservation when used in conjunction. In this paper we outline the objectives and the potential of both frameworks and their overlaps. Both are particularly helpful when dealing with uncertainty. A major problem for conservation decision-making is the interpretation of observations and scientific measurements. This paper considers probabilistic and non-probabilistic approaches to assessment and decision-making and recommends appropriate contexts for alternative approaches.
Journal
Biodiversity and Conservation – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 23, 2004