Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jillian Dawes, J. Rowley (1999)
Negative evaluations of service quality ‐ a framework for identification and responseJournal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science, 5
Ruth Bolton, J. Drew (1991)
A Multistage Model of Customers' Assessments of Service Quality and ValueJournal of Consumer Research, 17
P. Danaher, J. Mattsson (1994)
Cumulative Encounter Satisfaction in the Hotel Conference ProcessInternational Journal of Service Industry Management, 5
L. Harvey
Student satisfaction
A. Bell (1995)
User satisfaction surveys : experience at LeicesterNew Review of Academic Librarianship, 1
R. Rust, Anthony Zahorik, T. Keiningham (1995)
Return on Quality (ROQ): Making Service Quality Financially AccountableJournal of Marketing, 59
J. Cronin, Steven Taylor (1992)
Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and ExtensionJournal of Marketing, 56
A. Parasuraman, V. Zeithaml, L. Berry (1988)
SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.Journal of Retailing, 64
P. Ramsden (1991)
A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience QuestionnaireStudies in Higher Education, 16
S. Aldridge, J. Rowley (1998)
Student's charters: an evaluation and reflectionQuality in Higher Education, 4
C. Gronroos
Service quality: the six criteria of good perceived quality service
F. Buttle (1996)
SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agendaEuropean Journal of Marketing, 30
Department for Education
Higher Quality and Choice: the Charter for Higher Education
F.M. Hill
Managing service quality in higher education
Evaluates a methodology which was developed to measure student satisfaction with significant components of the service experience delivered to students at Edge Hill University College. Uses a questionnaire‐based survey to collect information on student satisfaction. The methodology has two unique features: the Student Charter informed the survey design; and student responses were collected electronically through on‐screen questionnaires accessible over an intranet. Outcomes suggest that there remains some resistance to the completion of an electronic questionnaire and both paper and electronic versions are likely to continue to be necessary in order to achieve optimum response rates. The methodology has identified specific aspects of the service experience where there was either an absence of student satisfaction or the level of student satisfaction was variable. These aspects have been further explored with focus groups and fed into the quality plan for the college. A “negative quality” model is proposed which may offer a framework for response to different types of feedback from students.
Quality Assurance in Education – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 1998
Keywords: Customer satisfaction; Evaluation; Methodology; Questionnaires; Service; Students
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.