Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1979)
Statistical Assoc
(2000)
Ecolog
E. Zivot, D. Andrews (1992)
Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root HypothesisJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20
(1988)
Dynam
(1973)
in 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory
S. Johansen, K. Juselius (2009)
MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE ON COINTEGRATION — WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE DEMAND FOR MONEYOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52
R. Engle, C. Granger (1991)
Long-Run Economic Relationships: Readings in CointegrationSouthern Economic Journal, 59
R. Kümmel, W. Strassl, A. Gossner, W. Eichhorn (1985)
Technical progress and energy dependent production functionsZeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 45
(2004)
Energy Econ
S. Johansen (1992)
Determination of Cointegration Rank in the Presence of a Linear TrendOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54
W. Nordhaus (2008)
A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies
Khalifa Ghali, M. El-Sakka (2004)
Energy use and output growth in Canada: a multivariate cointegration analysisEnergy Economics, 26
Chien‐Chiang Lee, Chun-ping Chang (2005)
STRUCTURAL BREAKS, ENERGY CONSUMPTION, AND ECONOMIC GROWTH REVISITED: EVIDENCE FROM TAIWANEnergy Economics, 27
Charles Hall, Dietmar Lindenberger, R. Kümmel, T. Kroeger, W. Eichhorn (2001)
The Need to Reintegrate the Natural Sciences with Economics, 51
D. Dickey, W. Fuller (1979)
Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit RootJournal of the American Statistical Association, 74
C. Cleveland, R. Kaufmann, D. Stern (2000)
Aggregation and the role of energy in the economyEcological Economics, 32
Michael Osterwald-Lenum (1992)
A Note with Quantiles of the Asymptotic Distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Rank Test StatisticsOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54
T. Matteo, T. Aste, M. Gallegati (2004)
Innovation flow through social networks: productivity distribution in France and ItalyThe European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 47
(1981)
Econometrica 49
D. Dickey, W. Fuller (1981)
LIKELIHOOD RATIO STATISTICS FOR AUTOREGRESSIVE TIME SERIES WITH A UNIT ROOTEconometrica, 49
R. Engle, C. Granger (1987)
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testingEconometrica, 55
R. Ayres, Benjamin Warr (2005)
Accounting for growth: the role of physical workStructural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16
Pierre Perron (1989)
The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock And The Unit Root HypothesisEconometrica, 57
(1979)
Surv
D. Stern (2000)
A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomyEnergy Economics, 22
A. Masih, Rumi Masih (1996)
Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction modelling techniquesEnergy Economics, 18
Christopher Clarke (2008)
A Question of BalanceScience Communication, 30
G. Schröer, P. Stahlecker (1996)
Ist die gesamtwirtschaftliche Cobb-Douglas- Produktionsfunktion eine Kointegrationsbeziehung? / Is the Macroeconomic Cobb-Douglas Production Function a Cointegration Relationship?Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 215
(1994)
Persp
(1989)
Econometrica 57
Dietmar Lindenberger (2003)
Service Production FunctionsJournal of Economics, 80
(1987)
Econometrica 55
(1992)
Resources Energy 14
R. Kümmel, J. Henn, Dietmar Lindenberger (2002)
Capital, labor, energy and creativity: modeling innovation diffusion ☆Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 13
Jia Shao, P. Ivanov, P. Ivanov, Boris Podobnik, Boris Podobnik, Boris Podobnik, H. Stanley (2007)
Quantitative relations between corruption and economic factorsThe European Physical Journal B, 56
(1992)
Oxford Bull
J. Westerlund (2006)
Testing for Panel Cointegration with Multiple Structural BreaksERN: Hypothesis Testing (Topic)
E. Yu, Jang Jin (1992)
Cointegration tests of energy consumption, income, and employmentResources and Energy, 14
R. Solow (1994)
Perspectives on Growth TheoryJournal of Economic Perspectives, 8
U. Soytaş, Ramazan Sari (2003)
Energy consumption and GDP: causality relationship in G-7 countries and emerging marketsEnergy Economics, 25
Cointegration analysis is applied to the linear combinations of the time series of (the logarithms of) output, capital, labor, and energy for Germany, Japan, and the USA since 1960. The computed cointegration vectors represent the output elasticities of the aggregate energy-dependent Cobb-Douglas function. The output elasticities give the economic weights of the production factors capital, labor, and energy. We find that they are for labor much smaller and for energy much larger than the cost shares of these factors. In standard economic theory output elasticities equal cost shares. Our heterodox findings support results obtained with LINEX production functions.
The European Physical Journal B – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.