Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Treviño (1986)
Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist ModelAcademy of Management Review, 11
M. Mintz (1969)
FDA and Panalba: a conflict of commercial, therapeutic goals?Science, 165 3896
Tetlock Tetlock (1985)
Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choiceResearch in Organizational Behavior, 7
W. Ickes (1982)
A Basic Paradigm for the Study of Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior
D. Lykken (1968)
Statistical significance in psychological research.Psychological bulletin, 70 3
Bart Victor, J. Cullen (1988)
The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work ClimatesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 33
P. Tetlock (1986)
A value pluralism model of ideological reasoningJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50
P. Tetlock (1983)
Accountability and complexity of thought.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45
V. Braithwaite, H. Law (1985)
Structure of human values: testing the adequacy of the Rokeach value surveyJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49
D. Katz (1964)
The motivational basis of organizational behavior.Behavioral science, 9 2
R. Cialdini, A. Levy, C. Herman, Scott Evenbeck (1973)
Attitudinal politics: The strategy of moderation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25
L. Berkowitz, E. Donnerstein (1982)
External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments.American Psychologist, 37
D. Mook (1983)
In defense of external invalidity.American Psychologist, 38
Hypotheses regarding the effects of personal values and accountability on the resolution of ethical dilemmas in management were formulated and tested experimentally with a sample of 135 M.B.A. students. Personal values were found to be related to how subjects chose to resolve an ethical dilemma presented to them; but, as expected, this relationship did not hold when subjects were made to feel accountable to another for their choices. Accountability, unexpectedly, however, did not have a main effect on choices. This lack of an effect tentatively was attributed to the inexplicitness of the accountability manipulations. In a second and third experiment, support for the importance of explicitness in accountability research was obtained. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings from all three experiments were discussed.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.