Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Tertiary and quaternary local anesthetics protect CNS white matter from anoxic injury at concentrations that do not block excitability

Tertiary and quaternary local anesthetics protect CNS white matter from anoxic injury at... Abstract 1. Anoxic injury in CNS white matter was studied using the in vitro rat optic nerve preparation. Optic nerves were subjected to 60 min of anoxia, and functional recovery was assessed using the area under the compound action potential (CAP). In normal cerebrospinal fluid, CAP area recovered to 33.5 +/- 9.3% (SD) of control. 2. Lidocaine and procaine (0.1 or 1.0 mM), applied beginning 1 h before anoxia, significantly improved postanoxic recovery of CAP area. However, both agents also depressed the preanoxic CAP. Procaine generally allowed greater recovery with less depression compared with lidocaine. 3. The quaternary derivatives QX-314 (0.1-1.0 mM) and QX-222 (0.3-3.0 mM) resulted in more complete recovery of the CAP area from anoxia, with less depression of preanoxic excitability, compared with the tertiary compounds. At 0.3 mM, QX-314 reduced the preanoxic CAP very little (to 94.4 +/- 14% of control CAP area), yet allowed the postanoxic CAP area to recover to 99.6 +/- 19%. 4. We conclude that quaternary local anesthetics are more effective at protecting CNS white matter tracts from anoxia than tertiary compounds and that these agents can result in markedly improved recovery even at concentrations that do not block conduction. Moreover, given the relative specificity of QX-314 for noninactivating Na+ channels, we hypothesize that this channel subtype plays an important role in mediating anoxic injury in central myelinated axons. Copyright © 1992 the American Physiological Society http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Neurophysiology The American Physiological Society

Tertiary and quaternary local anesthetics protect CNS white matter from anoxic injury at concentrations that do not block excitability

Journal of Neurophysiology , Volume 67 (1): 236 – Jan 1, 1992

Loading next page...
 
/lp/the-american-physiological-society/tertiary-and-quaternary-local-anesthetics-protect-cns-white-matter-CimZXqJsWO

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
The American Physiological Society
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 the American Physiological Society
ISSN
0022-3077
eISSN
1522-1598
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract 1. Anoxic injury in CNS white matter was studied using the in vitro rat optic nerve preparation. Optic nerves were subjected to 60 min of anoxia, and functional recovery was assessed using the area under the compound action potential (CAP). In normal cerebrospinal fluid, CAP area recovered to 33.5 +/- 9.3% (SD) of control. 2. Lidocaine and procaine (0.1 or 1.0 mM), applied beginning 1 h before anoxia, significantly improved postanoxic recovery of CAP area. However, both agents also depressed the preanoxic CAP. Procaine generally allowed greater recovery with less depression compared with lidocaine. 3. The quaternary derivatives QX-314 (0.1-1.0 mM) and QX-222 (0.3-3.0 mM) resulted in more complete recovery of the CAP area from anoxia, with less depression of preanoxic excitability, compared with the tertiary compounds. At 0.3 mM, QX-314 reduced the preanoxic CAP very little (to 94.4 +/- 14% of control CAP area), yet allowed the postanoxic CAP area to recover to 99.6 +/- 19%. 4. We conclude that quaternary local anesthetics are more effective at protecting CNS white matter tracts from anoxia than tertiary compounds and that these agents can result in markedly improved recovery even at concentrations that do not block conduction. Moreover, given the relative specificity of QX-314 for noninactivating Na+ channels, we hypothesize that this channel subtype plays an important role in mediating anoxic injury in central myelinated axons. Copyright © 1992 the American Physiological Society

Journal

Journal of NeurophysiologyThe American Physiological Society

Published: Jan 1, 1992

There are no references for this article.