Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/the-arbitrage-pricing-theory-is-it-testable-BBKghQLw6M
References (18)
-
G. Chamberlain, M. Rothschild (1981)
Arbitrage and Mean-Variance Analysis on Large Asset MarketsCapital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation
-
S. Ross (1977)
THE CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL (CAPM), SHORT‐SALE RESTRICTIONS AND RELATED ISSUESJournal of Finance, 32
-
B. King (1966)
Market and Industry Factors in Stock Price BehaviorThe Journal of Business, 39
-
Richard Roll, S. Ross (1980)
An Empirical Investigation of the Arbitrage Pricing TheoryJournal of Finance, 35
-
N. Chen (1983)
Some Empirical Tests of the Theory of Arbitrage PricingJournal of Finance, 38
-
Marc Reinganum (1981)
The Arbitrage Pricing Theory: Some Empirical ResultsJournal of Finance, 36
-
Richard Roll (1977)
A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory''s Tests: Part I -
M. Brennan (1981)
Empirical Tests of Multi-Factor Pricing Model: DiscussionJournal of Finance, 36
-
Stephen Brown, Mark Weinstein (1983)
A New Approach to Testing Asset Pricing Models: The Bilinear ParadigmJournal of Finance, 38
-
I. Evans, D. Morrison (1968)
Multivariate Statistical MethodsApplied statistics, 17
-
Gehr Gehr (1975)
“Some Tests of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory.”Journal of the Midwest Finance Association
-
Gur Huberman (1982)
A simple approach to arbitrage pricing theoryJournal of Economic Theory, 28
-
S. Ross (1978)
THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL (CAPM)Journal of Finance, 33
-
Brennan (1981)
DiscussionJournal of Finance, 36
-
Roll Roll (May 1977)
“A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory's Tests.”Journal of Financial Economics
-
George Oldfield, Richard Rogalski (1981)
Treasury Bill Factors and Common Stock ReturnsJournal of Finance, 36
-
H. Theil (1971)
Principles of econometrics -
S. Ross (1976)
The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricingJournal of Economic Theory, 13
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- 1982 The American Finance Association
- ISSN
- 0022-1082
- eISSN
- 1540-6261
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1982.tb03607.x
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper challenges the view that the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) is inherently more susceptible to empirical verification than the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). The usual formulation of the testable implications of the APT is shown to be inadequate, as it precludes the very expected return differentials which the theory attempts to explain. A recent competitive‐equilibrium extension of the APT may be testable in principle. In order to implement such a test, however, observation of the return on the true market portfolio appears to be necessary.
Journal
The Journal of Finance – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 1982