Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Roper, S. Findlay, P. Lüps, D. Shepherdson (1995)
Damage by badgers Meles meles to wheat Triticum vulgare and barley Hordeum sativum cropsJournal of Applied Ecology, 32
P. Cresswell, S. Harris, R. Bunce, D. Jefferies (1989)
The badger (Meles meles) in Britain: present status and future population changesBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 38
C. Mason (1990)
The social badger: By H. Kruuk. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1989. 155 pp, ISBN 0 19 858703 1. Price: £15·95Biological Conservation, 53
C. Wilson (1993)
Badger damage to growing oats and an assessment of electric fencing as a means of its reductionJournal of Zoology, 231
H. Griffiths, D. Thomas (1993)
The status of the Badger Meles meles (L., 1758) (Carnivora, Mustelidae) in EuropeMammal Review, 23
Mills Mills (1986)
Rabbits breed a growing controversy.New Scientist, 6
G. Wilson, S. Harris, G. Mclaren (1997)
Changes in the British badger population, 1988 to 1997
L. Rogers, C. Cheeseman, P. Mallinson, R. Clifton-Hadley (1997)
The demography of a high-density badger (Meles meles) population in the west of EnglandJournal of Zoology, 242
C. Milner (1967)
Badger damage to upland pastureJournal of Zoology, 153
Cresswell Cresswell, Harris Harris, Bunce Bunce, Jeffries Jeffries (1989)
The badger in Britain: present status and future population changes.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 38
Kruuk Kruuk, Parish Parish (1982)
Factors affecting population density, group size and territory size of the European badger, Meles meles.Journal of Zoology, 196
S. Harris (1984)
Ecology of Urban badgers Meles meles: Distribution in Britain and habitat selection, persecution, food and damage in the city of BristolBiological Conservation, 28
Griffiths Griffiths, Thomas Thomas (1993)
The status of the badger in Europe.Mammal Review, 23
H. Kruuk (1990)
The social badger : ecology and behaviour of a group-living carnivore (Meles meles)Journal of Applied Ecology, 27
H. Kruuk, T. Parish (1987)
Changes in the size of groups and ranges of the european badger (Meles meles L.) in an area in ScotlandJournal of Animal Ecology, 56
Summary 1. In response to reported increases in badger numbers and associated agricultural damage, a questionnaire survey of 3600 land owner/occupiers was conducted in 1997 to determine the extent and significance of badger damage in England and Wales. We assess the significance of badger‐induced damage and highlight problem regions, farm types and specific crops to allow targeting of future research efforts at amelioration. (This survey investigated alleged badger damage to agriculture but did not address the role of badgers in the transmission of bovine tuberculosis.) 2. The return rate of the questionnaire was 55·1% (n = 1982) and 150 of the responses were ground‐truthed. 3. Almost 30% of those land owner/occupiers who responded reported that badger damage had occurred in the previous 12 months, and 57% reported an increase in damage during the past 5 years. 4. Badger damage was widespread, but its incidence was highly dependent on region and farm type. The most frequently reported damage (25·5%) resulted from badgers’ burrowing activities (especially those causing damage to fences). Crop damage was also frequently reported (21·2%), with wheat, forage maize and vines being damaged most frequently. 5. Ground‐truthing showed that incorrect attribution to badgers of damage was negligible and that the majority of respondents had assessed correctly the extent and cost of badger damage, except for predation on livestock where most ‘evidence’ was circumstantial. 6. Most reported damage was of little economic consequence to individual land owners/occupiers; however, approximately 5% estimated that they had incurred costs of over £1000. 7. Assuming that the questionnaires returned were a random subset of those distributed, the mean estimated national cost was £41·5 million per annum (62% of which was due to burrowing activity). Assuming that all the non‐respondents had no damage, the estimate was £21·5 million per annum. 8. Future research into management options for damage limitation should be targeted at the areas and situations of most significant damage. These are primarily burrowing damage and direct crop damage to wheat, maize, vines, fruit and vegetables. The region suffering the most intense damage was the south‐west of England. The highly seasonal nature of the damage to some crops will allow preventative action to be taken at the most appropriate times. Predation by badgers on livestock is considered a small‐scale and unproven problem.
Journal of Applied Ecology – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.