Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Kleibergen Kleibergen, Paap Paap (2006)
Generalized Reduced Rank Tests Using the Singular Value DecompositionJournal of Econometrics, 133
Core Core, Guay Guay (2002)
Estimating the Value of Employee Stock Option Portfolios and Their Sensitivities to Price and VolatilityJournal of Accounting Research, 40
Gompers Gompers, Ishii Ishii, Metrick Metrick (2003)
Corporate Governance and Equity PricesQuarterly Journal of Economics, 118
Lee Lee, Lemieux Lemieux (2010)
Regression Discontinuity Designs in EconomicsJournal of Economic Literature, 48
Morgan Morgan, Poulsen Poulsen, Wolf Wolf (2006)
The Evolution of Shareholder Voting for Executive Compensation SchemesJournal of Corporate Finance, 12
Cuñat Cuñat, Gine Gine, Guadalupe Guadalupe (2012)
The Vote Is Cast: The Effect of Corporate Governance on Shareholder ValueJournal of Finance, 67
Engel Engel, Hayes Hayes, Wang Wang (2003)
CEO Turnover and Properties of Accounting InformationJournal of Accounting and Economics, 36
McCrary McCrary (2008)
Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density TestJournal of Econometrics, 142
Core Core, Holthausen Holthausen, Larcker Larcker (1999)
Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm PerformanceJournal of Financial Economics, 51
Cai Cai, Garner Garner, Walkling Walkling (2009)
Electing DirectorsThe Journal of Finance, 64
Cai Cai, Walkling Walkling (2011)
Shareholders’ Say on Pay: Does It Create Value?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46
Larcker Larcker, Rusticus Rusticus (2010)
On the Use of Instrumental Variables in Accounting ResearchJournal of Accounting and Economics, 49
Imbens Imbens, Kalyanaraman Kalyanaraman (2012)
Optimal Bandwidth Choice for the Regression Discontinuity EstimatorReview of Economic Studies, 79
Levit Levit, Malenko Malenko (2011)
Nonbinding Voting for Shareholder ProposalsJournal of Finance, 66
Listokin Listokin (2009)
Corporate Voting Versus Market Price SettingAmerican Law and Economics Review, 11
Ashley (2009)
Assessing the Credibility of Instrumental Variables Inference with Imperfect Instruments via Sensitivity AnalysisJournal of Applied Econometrics, 24
Fischer Fischer, Gramlich Gramlich, Miller Miller, White White (2009)
Investor Perceptions of Board Performance: Evidence from Uncontested Director ElectionsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 48
Hahn Hahn, Todd Todd, Van der Klaauw Van der Klaauw (2001)
Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression‐Discontinuity DesignEconometrica, 69
Core Core, Guay Guay, Larcker Larcker (2008)
The Power of the Pen and Executive CompensationJournal of Financial Economics, 88
Martin Martin, Thomas Thomas (2005)
When Is Enough, Enough? Market Reaction to Highly Dilutive Stock Option Plans and the Subsequent Impact on CEO CompensationJournal of Corporate Finance, 11
Lee Lee (2008)
Randomized Experiments from Non‐Random Selection in U.S. House ElectionsJournal of Econometrics, 142
Morgan Morgan, Poulsen Poulsen, Wolf Wolf, Yang Yang (2011)
Mutual Funds as Monitors: Evidence from Mutual Fund VotingJournal of Corporate Finance, 17
Core Core, Guay Guay (1999)
The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive LevelsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 28
Del Guercio Del Guercio, Seery Seery, Woidtke Woidtke (2008)
Do Boards Pay Attention When Institutional Investor Activists ‘Just Vote No’?Journal of Financial Economics, 90
Ferri Ferri, Maber Maber (2013)
Say on Pay Votes and CEO Compensation: Evidence from the UKReview of Finance, 17
Ertimur Ertimur, Ferri Ferri, Muslu Muslu (2010)
Shareholder Activism and CEO PayReview of Financial Studies, 24
Listokin Listokin (2008)
Management Always Wins the Close OnesAmerican Law and Economics Review, 10
Burns (2006)
The Impact of Performance-Based Compensation on MisreportingJournal of Financial Economics, 79
Coles Coles, Daniel Daniel, Naveen Naveen (2006)
Managerial Incentives and Risk‐TakingJournal of Financial Economics, 79
Yermack Yermack (2010)
Shareholder Voting and Corporate GovernanceAnnual Review of Financial Economics, 2
ABSTRACT This study examines the effects of shareholder support for equity compensation plans on subsequent CEO compensation. Using cross‐sectional regression, instrumental variable, and regression discontinuity research designs, we find little evidence that either lower shareholder voting support for, or outright rejection of, proposed equity compensation plans leads to decreases in the level or composition of future CEO incentive compensation. We also find that, in cases where the equity compensation plan is rejected by shareholders, firms are more likely to propose, and shareholders are more likely to approve, a plan the following year. Our results suggest that shareholder votes for equity pay plans have little substantive impact on firms’ incentive compensation policies. Thus, recent regulatory efforts aimed at strengthening shareholder voting rights, particularly in the context of executive compensation, may have limited effect on firms’ compensation policies.
Journal of Accounting Research – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.