Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Park, J.N. Priestley, W.D. Gill (1982)
Ductility of square-confined concrete columnsASCE J. Struct. Div., 108
P. Desayi, K. lyengar, T. Reddy (1979)
Stress-strain characteristics of concrete confined in steel spirals under repeated loadingMatériaux et Construction, 12
S. Popovics (1973)
A numerical approach to the complete stress-strain curve of concreteCement and Concrete Research, 3
B. Izzuddin, C. Karayannis, A. Elnashai (1994)
Advanced Nonlinear Formulation for Reinforced Concrete Beam-ColumnsJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 120
R. Park (1989)
Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testingBulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 22
R. Park, M. Priestley, W. Gill (1982)
Ductility of Square-Confined Concrete ColumnsJournal of the Structural Division, 108
(1983)
Response of R.C. critical regions under large amplitude reversed actions
B. Sinha, K. Gerslt, L. Tulin (1964)
STRESS - STRAIN RELATIONS FOR CONCRETE UNDER CYCLIC LOADING, 61
J. Mander, M. Priestley, R. Park (1988)
Theoretical stress strain model for confined concreteJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 114
P. Karsan, J. Jirsa (1969)
BEHAVIOUR OF CONCRETE UNDER COMPRESSIVE LOADING, 95
P. Desayi, K. T. Sundara Raja Iyengar, T. Sanjeeva Reddy (1979)
Stress-strain characteristics of concrete confined in steel spirals under repeated loadingMater. Struct., 12
D. Yankelevsky, H. Reinhardt (1987)
Model for Cyclic Compressive Behavior of ConcreteJournal of Structural Engineering-asce, 113
H. Petersson, E. Popov (1977)
Constitutive Relations for Generalized LoadingsJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 103
B. Izzuddin (1990)
Nonlinear dynamic analysis of framed structures
A uniaxial cyclic model for confined and unconfined concrete is developed. Starting from an existing model, the cyclic rules to define inelastic strain and degradation of strength and stiffness are first reviewed and then modified to produce a new concrete model with enhanced performance. Comparisons at the stress-strain level between the new and existing concrete models reveal the adequacy of the new model in terms of numerical stability and increasing degradation of strength and stiffness under increasing cyclic strain. The proposed model is validated by comparing analytical predictions with experimental results of reinforced concrete members under cyclic and dynamic loading. Good agreement is observed between analysis and experiments, confirming the ability of the model to predict the cyclic and dynamic behavior of reinforced concrete members with mixed axial-flexural response characteristics.
Materials and Structures – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 14, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.