Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
I. Henderson, J. Vickery, R. Fuller (2000)
Summer bird abundance and distribution on set‐aside fields on intensive arable farms in EnglandEcography, 23
Jeremy Wilson, R. Taylor, L. Muirhead (1996)
Field use by farmland birds in winter: an analysis of field type preferences using resampling methodsBird Study, 43
M. Shrubb, P. Lack, J. Greenwood (1991)
The numbers and distribution of Lapwings V. vanellus nesting in England and Wales in 1987Bird Study, 38
Jeremy Wilson, Julianne Evans, S. Browne, J. King (1997)
Territory distribution and breeding success of skylarks Alauda arvensis on organic and intensive farmland in southern EnglandJournal of Applied Ecology, 34
Millenbah Millenbah, Winterstein Winterstein, Campa Campa, Furrow Furrow, Minnis Minnis (1996)
Effects of conservation reserve program field age on avian relative abundance, diversity and productivityWilson Bulletin, 108
D. Chamberlain, Andrew Wilson, S. Browne, J. Vickery (1999)
Effects of habitat type and management on the abundance of skylarks in the breeding seasonJournal of Applied Ecology, 36
Wilson Wilson, Evans Evans, Poulsen Poulsen, Evans Evans (1995)
Wasteland or oasis? The use of set‐aside by breeding and wintering birdsBritish Wildlife, 6
L. Taylor, R. O’Connor, M. Shrubb (1987)
Farming and Birds
G. Siriwardena, S. Baillie, S. Buckland, R. Fewster, J. Marchant, Jeremy Wilson (1998)
Trends in the abundance of farmland birds: a quantitative comparison of smoothed Common Birds Census indicesJournal of Applied Ecology, 35
M. Hansson, H. Fogelfors (1998)
Management of permanent set-aside on arable land in SwedenJournal of Applied Ecology, 35
K. Millenbah, Scorr Winterstein, H. Campa, Ly Furrow, R. Minnis (1996)
Effects of conservation reserve program field age on avian relative abundance, diversity, and productivityThe Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 108
J. Poulsen, N. Sotherton, N. Aebischer (1998)
Comparative nesting and feeding ecology of skylarks Alauda arvensis on arable farmland in southern England with special reference to set‐asideJournal of Applied Ecology, 35
A. Sugden, G. Rands (1990)
The ecology of temperate cereal fieldsTrends in Ecology and Evolution, 5
Manosa Manosa (1994)
The impact of rotational set‐aside on pheasantsGame Conservancy Annual Review, 25
D. Macdonald, P. Johnson (1995)
The relationship between bird distribution and the botanical and structural characteristics of hedgesJournal of Applied Ecology, 32
Tim Coulson, David Brown, P. Rothery (1995)
Models in Biology: Mathematics, Statistics and ComputingJournal of Animal Ecology, 64
D. Buckingham, A. Evans, A. Morris, C. Orsman, R. Yaxley (1999)
Use of set-aside land in winter by declining farmland bird species in the UKBird Study, 46
M. Rands (1985)
Pesticide use on cereals and the survival of grey partridge chicks: a field experimentJournal of Applied Ecology, 22
D. Elston, A. Illius, I. Gordon (1996)
ASSESSMENT OF PREFERENCE AMONG A RANGE OF OPTIONS USING LOG RATIO ANALYSISEcology, 77
Åke Berg, T. Pärt (1994)
Abundance of breeding farmland birds on arable and set‐aside fields at forest edgesEcography, 17
T. Parish, K. Lakhani, T. Sparks (1994)
Modelling the Relationship Between Bird Population Variables and Hedgerow and Other Field Margin Attributes. I. Species Richness of Winter, Summer and Breeding BirdsJournal of Applied Ecology, 31
P. Donald, A. Evans (1994)
Habitat selection by Corn Buntings Miliaria calandra in winterBird Study, 41
E. Bignal, D. McCracken (1996)
Low-intensity farming systems in the conservation of the countrysideJournal of Applied Ecology, 33
A. Watson, R. Rae (1997)
Some effects of set-aside on breeding birds in northeast ScotlandBird Study, 44
Wilson Wilson, Fuller Fuller (1992)
Set‐aside potential and management for wildlifeEcos, 13
A. Evans, Ken Smith (1994)
Habitat selection of Cirl Buntings Emberiza cirlus wintering in BritainBird Study, 41
D. Goodwin (1976)
Crows of the world
N. Aebischer, P. Robertson, R. Kenward (1993)
Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking DataEcology, 74
Fisher Fisher, Davies Davies, Christel Christel (1994)
The potential for creating wildlife habitats and amenity grassland from non‐rotational set‐asideAspects of Applied Biology, 40
P. Donald, C. Forrest (1995)
The effects of agricultural change on population size of Corn Buntings Miliaria calandra on individual farmsBird Study, 42
R. Green, P. Osborne, E. Sears (1994)
The distribution of Passerine birds in hedgerows during the breeding season in relation to characteristics of the hedgerow and adjacent farmlandJournal of Applied Ecology, 31
T. Parish, K. Lakhani, T. Sparks (1995)
Modelling the relationship between bird population variables and hedgerow, and other field margin attributes. II. Abundance of individual species and of groups of similar speciesJournal of Applied Ecology, 32
J. Sharrock (1980)
The Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland
P. Wilson, N. Aebischer (1995)
The Distribution of Dicotyledonous Arable Weeds in Relation to Distance from the Field EdgeJournal of Applied Ecology, 32
Henderson Henderson, Evans Evans (2000)
Responses of birds to set‐aside and its management. Proceedings of the British Ornithological Union Conference, SouthamptonIbis
Rands Rands (1986)
The survival of gamebird (Galliformes) chicks in relation to pesticide use on cerealsIbis, 128
R. Fuller, R. Gregory, D. Gibbons, J. Marchant, Jeremy Wilson, S. Baillie, N. Carter (1995)
Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in BritainConservation Biology, 9
Evans Evans, Curtoys Curtoys, Kew Kew, Lea Lea, Rayment Rayment (1997)
Set‐aside: conservation by accident…and design? Royal Society for the Protection of BirdsConservation Review, 11
Poulsen Poulsen (1996)
Behaviour and parental care of skylark Alauda arvensis chicksIbis, 138
Summary 1. Set‐aside is arable land rested from normal intensive operations, usually providing, in summer, a relatively sparse, weedy or grass‐dominated sward without pesticide or fertilizer inputs. Set‐aside is therefore potentially attractive to breeding and foraging birds and is predicted to contribute to increased avian biodiversity on arable or mixed farmland. Set‐aside mimics low intensity farmland within the heart of the industrial farm landscape, thereby allowing direct comparison with intensive crops regarding their respective values for the bird fauna. 2. In this study, bird abundance was compared between set‐aside and nearby crops or grassland. A particular focus of the study was to identify the breadth or generality of any preferences across a suite of farmland species, using data from a broad representation of English farms. Thus, an extensive survey of birds utilizing fields, including set‐aside, was conducted on 92 arable farms in England during 1996 and 1997. Each farm was visited four times in each summer, habitat details were recorded, and all birds seen or heard were mapped using a standard technique. 3. Field type preferences were examined across bird functional groups representing gamebirds, pigeons, crows, skylark Alauda arvensis, thrushes (Turdidae) and granivorous passerines (Passeridae, Fringillidae and Emberizidae). The relationship between bird abundance and field type was analysed using log‐linear Poisson regression and compositional analysis. 4. Both analyses revealed that bird abundances were significantly higher on set‐aside than on winter cereals for all six functional groups, and were highest on rotational set‐aside for all functional groups except crows (which preferred grassland). Winter cereals or grassland were generally the least preferred habitat. 5. On farms where both rotational and non‐rotational set‐aside was present, preferences were strongest for rotational set‐aside for all functional groups except crows (which preferred non‐rotational set‐aside). This underlines the differences between set‐aside sward composition in influencing bird numbers. 6. The results show broad‐scale preferences for set‐aside over crops or grassland for species representing non‐passerines, passerines, insectivores and granivores, for a wide representation of farms in England. For the majority of species, this preference implies that set‐aside is utilized as a source of food, and the scale of this preference is impressive given that most set‐aside was not managed specifically for bird conservation. However, not all types of set‐aside were equally exploited by birds, as the strongest preferences were for natural regeneration rotational set‐aside rather than the more structurally uniform non‐rotational set‐aside. 7. The results are important in the context of the potential loss of set‐aside from the arable countryside, but also for the development of future agri‐environmental schemes. We suggest that, to reverse population declines of many farmland birds in Britain, such schemes will need to be introduced on a wide geographical scale, like set‐aside, but will also need to be carefully tailored, through advice to farmers, to maximize their potential to support bird species.
Journal of Applied Ecology – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.