Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2007)
2007a: Growth analysis of maize
G. Hoogenboom, James Jones, K. Boote (1992)
Modeling Growth, Development, and Yield of Grain Legumes using Soygro, Pnutgro, and Beangro: A ReviewTransactions of the ASABE, 35
(2004)
Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer Version 4.0. [CD-ROM
C. Jaarsveld, M. Smit, G. Krüger (2002)
Interaction Amongst Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] Genotype, Soil Type and Inoculant Strain with Regard to N2 FixationJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 188
H. Meinke, G. Hammer, S. Chapman (1993)
A sunflower simulation model: II. Simulating production risks in a variable sub-tropical environmentAgronomy Journal, 85
K. Boote, M. Tollenaar (1994)
Modeling Genetic Yield Potential
(1994)
Analyzing the limitation set by climatic factors, genotype, and water and nitrogen availability on productivity of wheat: II. Climatically potential yields and management strategies
Kaushal Tewari, Taketo Suganuma, H. Fujikake, N. Ohtake, K. Sueyoshi, Yoshihiko Takahashi, T. Ohyama (2004)
Effect of Deep Placement of N Fertilizers and Different Inoculation Methods of Bradyrhizobia on Growth, N2 Fixation Activity and N Absorption Rate of Field‐grown Soybean PlantsJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190
J. Anothai, A. Patanothai, S. Jogloy, K. Pannangpetch, K. Boote, G. Hoogenboom (2008)
A sequential approach for determining the cultivar coefficients of peanut lines using end-of-season data of crop performance trialsField Crops Research, 108
N. Phakamas, A. Patanothai, K. Pannangpetch, S. Jogloy, G. Hoogenboom (2008)
Dynamic patterns of components of genotype × environment interaction for pod yield of peanut over multiple years: A simulation approachField Crops Research, 106
N. Phakamas, A. Patanothai, K. Pannangpetch, S. Jogloy, G. Hoogenboom (2008)
Seasonal responses and genotype-by-season interactions for the growth dynamic and development traits of peanutThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 146
R. Kucey, P. Chaiwanakupt, N. Boonkerd, P. Snitwongse, C. Siripaibool, P. Wadisirisuk, T. Arayangkool (1989)
Nitrogen fixation (N‐15 dilution) with soybeans under Thai field conditions. IV. Effect of N addition and Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculation in soils with indigenous B. japonicum populationsJournal of Applied Microbiology, 67
K. Boote, James Jones, G. Hoogenboom, N. Pickering (1998)
The CROPGRO model for grain legumes
James Jones, G. Hoogenboom, C. Porter, K. Boote, W. Batchelor, L. Hunt, P. Wilkens, U. Singh, A. Gijsman, J. Ritchie (2003)
The DSSAT cropping system modelEuropean Journal of Agronomy, 18
Chapman Chapman, Hammer Hammer, Butler Butler, Cooper Cooper (2000)
Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. III: temporal sequences and spatial patterns in the target population of environmentsAust. J. Agric. Res., 51
Ying Jefing, D. Herridge, M. Peoples, B. Rerkasem (1992)
Effects of N fertilization on N2 fixation and N balances of soybean grown after lowland ricePlant and Soil, 147
D. Wallach, B. Goffinet (1987)
Mean squared error of prediction in models for studying ecological and agronomic systemsBiometrics, 43
James Jones, G. Tsuji, G. Hoogenboom, L. Hunt, P. Thornton, P. Wilkens, D. Imamura, W. Bowen, U. Singh (1998)
Decision support system for agrotechnology transfer: DSSAT v3
Kucey Kucey, Chaiwanakupt Chaiwanakupt, Boonkerd Boonkerd, Sanitwongse Sanitwongse, Siripaibool Siripaibool, Wadisirisuk Wadisirisuk, Arayangkool Arayangkool (1989)
Nitrogen fixation (N‐15 dilution) with soybeans under Thai field conditions. IV. Effect of N addition and Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculation in soils with indigenous B. japonicum populationsJ. Appl. Bacteriol., 67
S. Geng, C. Hess, J. Auburn (1990)
Sustainable Agricultural Systems: Concepts and DefinitionsJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 165
(1988)
Experimental Design and Data Collection Procedure for IBSNAT. The Minimum Data Sets for Systems Analysis and Crop Simulation
M. Bell, R. Fischer (1994)
Using yield prediction models to assess yield gains: a case study for wheatField Crops Research, 36
F. Vries, P. Teng, K. Metselaar (1993)
Systems approaches for agricultural development
Growth analysis of maize grown off - season in a subtropical environment under rainfed and irrigated conditions
P. Banterng, A. Patanothai, K. Pannangpetch, S. Jogloy, G. Hoogenboom (2006)
Yield stability evaluation of peanut lines: A comparison of an experimental versus a simulation approachField Crops Research, 96
P. Aggarwal, N. Kalra (1994)
Analyzing the limitations set by climatic factors, genotype, and water and nitrogen availability on productivity of wheat II. Climatically potential yields and management strategiesField Crops Research, 38
J. Ritchie (1998)
Soil water balance and plant water stress
J. White, G. Hoogenboom, James Jones, K. Boote (1995)
Evaluation of the Dry Bean Model BEANGRO V1.01 for Crop Production Research in a Tropical EnvironmentExperimental Agriculture, 31
H. Meinke, G. Hammer (1995)
A Peanut Simulation Model: II. Assessing Regional Production PotentialAgronomy Journal, 87
C. Willmott (1982)
Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model PerformanceBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 63
D. Egli, W. Bruening (1992)
Planting date and soybean yield: evaluation of environmental effects with a crop simulation model: SOYGRO☆Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 62
(2008)
Seasonal responses and genotypeby-season interactions for the dynamic growth and development traits of peanut
P. Banterng, A. Patanothai, K. Pannangpetch, S. Jogloy, G. Hoogenboom (2003)
Seasonal variation in the dynamic growth and development traits of peanut linesThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 141
Gan Yinbo, M. Peoples, B. Rerkasem (1997)
THE EFFECT OF N FERTILIZER STRATEGY ON N2 FIXATION GROWTH AND YIELD OF VEGETABLE SOYBEANField Crops Research, 51
C. Soler, G. Hoogenboom, P. Sentelhas, A. Duarte (2007)
Impact of Water Stress on Maize Grown Off‐Season in a Subtropical EnvironmentJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 193
G. Tsuji, G. Hoogenboom, P. Thornton (1998)
Understanding Options for Agricultural Production
S. Chapman, G. Hammer, D. Butler, M. Cooper (2000)
Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. III. Temporal sequences and spatial patterns in the target population of environmentsCrop & Pasture Science, 51
K. Boote, James Jones, G. Hoogenboom (2018)
Simulation of Crop Growth: CROPGRO ModelAgricultural Systems modeting and Simulation
1993: Systems Approaches for Agricultural Development
C. Soler, P. Sentelhas, G. Hoogenboom (2007)
Application of the CSM-CERES-Maize model for planting date evaluation and yield forecasting for maize grown off-season in a subtropical environmentEuropean Journal of Agronomy, 27
(1998)
Understanding Options for Agricultural Production. Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development
L. Hunt, S. Pararajasingham, J. Wiersma (1996)
Effects of planting date on the development and yield of spring wheat: Simulation of field dataCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 76
The determination of optimum crop management practices for increasing soybean production can provide valuable information for strategic planning in the tropics. However, this process is time consuming and expensive. The use of a dynamic crop simulation model can be an alternative option to help estimate yield levels under various growing conditions. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the performance of the Cropping System Model (CSM)‐CROPGRO‐Soybean and to determine optimum management practices for soybean for growing conditions in the Phu Pha Man district, Thailand. Data from two soybean experiments that were conducted in 1991 at Chiang Mai University and in 2003 at Khon Kaen University were used to determine the cultivar coefficients for the cultivars CM 60 and SJ 5. The CSM‐CROPGRO‐Soybean model was evaluated with data from two experiments that were conducted at Chiang Mai University. The observed data sets from farmers’ fields located in the Phu Pha Man district were also used for model evaluation. Simulations for different management scenarios were conducted with soil property information for seven different soil series and historical weather data for the period 1972–2003 to predict the optimum crop management practices for soybean production in the Phu Pha Man district. The results of this study indicated that the cultivar coefficients of the two soybean cultivars resulted in simulated growth and development parameters that were in good agreement with almost all observed parameters. Model evaluation showed a good agreement between simulated and observed data for phenology and growth of soybean, and demonstrated the potential of the CSM‐CROPGRO‐Soybean model to simulate growth and yield for local environments, including farmers’ fields, in Thailand. The CSM‐CROPGRO‐Soybean simulations indicated that the optimum planting dates from June 15 to July 15 produced maximum soybean yield in a rainfed environment. However, the planting date December 15 produced the highest yield under quality irrigation. Soybean yield was slightly improved by applying nitrogen at a rate of 30 kg N ha−1 at planting. Soybean yield also improved when the plant density was increased from 20 to 40 plants m−2. The results from this study suggest that the CSM‐CROPGRO‐Soybean model can be a valuable tool in assisting with determining optimum management practices for soybean cropping systems in the Phu Pha Man district and might be applicable to other agricultural production areas in Thailand and southeast Asia.
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.