Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
George Klein, Gary Pearson, J. Nadkarni, J. Nadkarni, Eva Klein, G. Henle, Werner Henle, Peter Clifford (1968)
RELATION BETWEEN EPSTEIN-BARR VIRAL AND CELL MEMBRANE IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE OF BURKITT TUMOR CELLSThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 128
Klein Klein, Pearson Pearson, Henle Henle, Henle Henle, Goldstein Goldstein, Clifford Clifford (1969)
Relation between Epstein‐Barr viral and cell membrane immunofluorescence in Burkitt tumor cells. III. Comparison of blocking of direct membrane immunofluorescence and anti‐EBV reactivities of different seraJ. exp. Med., 129
G. Klein, G. Pearson, G. Henle, W. Henle, Volker Diehl, J. Niederman (1968)
RELATION BETWEEN EPSTEIN-BARR VIRAL AND CELL MEMBRANE IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE IN BURKITT TUMOR CELLSThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 128
G. Goldstein, G. Klein, G. Pearson, P. Clifford (1969)
Direct membrane immunofluorescence reaction of Burkitt's lymphoma cells in culture.Cancer research, 29 4
J. Nadkarni, J. Nadkarni, P. Clifford, G. Manolov, E. Fenyö, E. Klein (1969)
Characteristics of new cell lines derived from Burkitt lymphomasCancer, 23
G. Klein, P. Clifford, E. Klein, J. Stjernsward (1966)
Search for tumor-specific immune reactions in Burkitt lymphoma patients by the membrane immunofluorescence reaction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 55 6
Klein Klein, Pearson Pearson, Henle Henle, Henle Henle, Diehl Diehl, Niederman Niederman (1968a)
Relation between Epstein‐Barr viral and cell membrane immunofluorescence in Burkitt tumor cells. II. Comparison of cells and sera from patients with Burkitt lymphoma and infectious mononucleosisJ. exp. Med., 128
G. Henle, W. Henle, V. Diehl (1968)
Relation of Burkitt's tumor-associated herpes-ytpe virus to infectious mononucleosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 59 1
E. Klein, P. Clifford, G. Klein, C. Hamberger (1967)
Further studies on the membrane immunofluorescence reaction of Burkitt lymphoma cellsInternational Journal of Cancer, 2
Klein Klein, Pearson Pearson, Nadkarni Nadkarni, Nadkarni Nadkarni, Klein Klein, Clifford Clifford, Henle Henle, Henle Henle (1968b)
Relation between Epstein‐Barr viral and cell membrane immunofluorescence in Burkitt tumor cells. I. Dependence of cell membrane fluorescence on presence of EB‐virusJ. exp. Med., 128
W. Henle, G. Henle (1968)
Effect of Arginine-deficient Media on the Herpes-Type Virus Associated with Cultured Burkitt Tumor CellsJournal of Virology, 2
viral and cell membrane immunofluorescence in Burkitt tumor cells. 11. Comparison of cells and sera from patients with Burkitt lymphoma and infectious mononucleosis
Pearson Pearson, Klein Klein, Henle Henle, Henle Henle, Clifford Clifford (1969)
Relation between Epstein‐Barr viral and cell membrane immunofluorescence in Burkitt tumor cells. IV. Differentiation between antibodies responsible for membrane and viral immunofluorescenceJ. exp. Med., 129
G. Klein, P. Clifford, E. Klein, R. Smith, J. Minowada, F. Kourilsky, J. Burchenal (1967)
Membrane immunofluorescence reactions of Burkitt lymphoma cells from biopsy specimens and tissue cultures.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 39 5
Membrane immunofluorescence (MIF) reactivity of Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) carrying cultured Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) cells with BL sera shows certain fluctuations from time to time, even with standard reference sera and apparently constant tissue culture conditions. In order to determine the culture conditions that are critical for this variation and to establish the optimal situation favoring the production of highly reactive cells, we studied two established BL‐derived cell lines under different conditions of initial cell number, cell density per unit volume or bottom unit area in the culture vessel, depth of the fluid phase, proportion of conditioned medium, etc. Although the two lines behaved somewhat differently, they showed better reactivity when maintained at a high concentration, as long as crowding did not entirely prevent cell multiplication. Under identical conditions of medium supply and depth of the fluid phase, more closely packed cells within a smaller bottom area of the culture vessel exhibited a better MIF reactivity than more dispersed cells. Under different conditions of growth, there was an inverse relationship between the rate of cell multiplication and the percentage of viable MIF‐positive cells. Optimal conditions with steady, high‐level reactivity have been worked out for both lines, but were different with regard to quantitative detail.
International Journal of Cancer – Wiley
Published: Nov 15, 1969
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.