Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Cotton, J. Tuttle (1986)
Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with Implications for ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 11
P. Attewell (1987)
Big brother and the sweatshop: computer surveillance in the automated office
D. Ilgen, C. Fisher, M. Taylor (1979)
Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 64
B. Tuckman, Wilmot Oliver (1968)
Effectiveness of feedback to teachers as a function of source.Journal of educational psychology, 59 4
Berger Berger (1983)
The promise of criterion‐referenced performance appraisal (CRPA)Review of Public Personnel Administration, 3
K. Halperin, C. Snyder, R. Shenkel, B. Houston (1976)
Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback.The Journal of applied psychology, 61 7
K. Eisenhardt (1985)
Control: Organizational and Economic ApproachesManagement Science, 31
P. Bentler, D. Bonett (1980)
Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance StructuresPsychological Bulletin, 88
C. Werts, R. Linn, K. Jöreskog (1974)
Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural AssumptionsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 34
W. Ouchi, M. Maguire (1975)
Organizational Control: Two Functions.Administrative Science Quarterly, 20
Jacobson Jacobson (May, 1984)
When machines monitor workWorld of Work Report, 9
W. Ouchi (1977)
The Relationship Between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control.Administrative Science Quarterly, 22
Marx Marx, Sherizen Sherizen (NovDec, 1986)
Monitoring on the job: How to protect privacy as well as propertyTechnology Review, 89
M. Jacobs, A. Jacobs, G. Feldman, N. Cavior (1973)
Feedback. II. The "credibility gap": delivery of positive and negative and emotional and behavioral feedback in groups.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 41 2
D. Rindskopf (1983)
Parameterizing inequality constraints on unique variances in linear structural modelsPsychometrika, 48
Nussbaum Nussbaum, Rivage Rivage (1986)
Computer monitoring: Mismanagement by remote controlBusiness and Society Review, 56
Computer‐aided monitoring is a phenomenon that is likely to become more prevalent in the workplace and, thus, central to understanding contemporary employee responses to work. This study develops a model for examining the impact of monitoring on employee‐level job satisfaction and turnover propensity. The results show that for some employees the negative effects of monitoring are inherent, but for others its negative impact can be mitigated by attention to feedback/performance appraisal processes. While organizational‐level rules pertaining to monitoring are important, managerial efforts aimed at minimizing negative consequences for the organization and individuals need to pay close attention to the feedback/performance appraisal processes.
Personnel Psychology – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 1989
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.