Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J.H. Connell (1961)
The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatusJournal of Animal Ecology, 42
(2001)
Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeEcological Modelling
B. Huntley, P.J. Bartlein, I.C. Prentice (1989)
Climatic control of the distribution and abundance of beech (Fagus L.) in Europe and North AmericaConservation Biology, 16
K. Higgins, D.M. Richardson (1999)
Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: the role of long‐distance dispersalJournal of Biogeography, 153
C.D. Pigott, J.P. Huntley (1981)
Factors controlling the distribution of Tilia cordata at the northern limits of its geographical range. III. Nature and causes of seed sterilityThe Quarterly Review Biology, 87
F.I. Woodward, I. Rochefort (1991)
Sensitivity analysis of vegetation diversity to environmental change, 1
R.J. Whittaker, K.J. Willis, R. Field (2001)
Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity, 28
G.E. Hutchinson (1957)
Concluding remarksNature, 22
M.T. Sykes, I.C. Prentice, W. Cramer (1996)
A bioclimatic model for the potential distributions of north European tree species under present and future climates, 23
M.L. Cain, B.G. Milligan, A.E. Strand (2000)
Long‐distance dispersal in plant populationsJournal of Vegetation Science, 87
N.B. Kotliar, J.A. Wiens (1990)
Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneityJournal of Biogeography, 59
C.D. Thomas, E.J. Bodsworth, R.J. Wilson, A.D. Simmons, Z.G. Davies, M. Musche, L. Conradt (2001)
Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins, 411
A.T. Peterson, V. Sanchez‐Cordero, J. Soberon, J. Bartley, R.W. Buddemeier, A.G. Navarro‐Singuenza (2001)
Effects of global climate change on geographic distributions of Mexican CracidaeGlobal Ecology Biogeography Letters, 144
G. Plaisance (1979)
L’if, 126
G.F. Midgley, L. Hannah, D. Millar, M.C. Rutherford, L.W. Powerie (2002)
Assessing the vulnerability of species richness to anthropogenic climate change in a biodiversity hotspotJournal of Biogeography, 11
L. Hannah, G.F. Midgley, D. Millar (2002)
Climate change‐integrated conservation strategiesJournal of Biogeography, 11
J.S. Clark, C. Fastie, G. Hurtt, S.T. Jackson, C. Johnson, G.A. King, M. Lewis, J. Lynch, S. Pacala, I.C. Prentice, E.W. Schupp, T. Webb, P. Wyckoff (1998)
Reid's paradox of rapid plant migration: dispersal theory and interpretation of paleoecological recordsJournal of Applied Ecology, 48
M.A. Leibold (1995)
The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community contextJournal of Biogeography, 76
J.R. Etterson, R.G. Shaw (2001)
Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warmingGlobal Ecology and Biogeograpgy, 294
W. Cramer, A. Bondeau, F.I. Woodward, I.C. Prentice, R.A. Betts, V. Brovkin, P.M. Cox, V. Fisher, J.A. Foley, A.D. Friend, C. Kucharik, M.R. Lomas, N. Ramankutty, S. Sitch, B. Smith, A. White, C. Young‐Molling (2001)
Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation modelsScience, 7
Y.C. Collingham, R.A. Wadsworth, B. Huntley, P.E. Hulme (2000)
Predicting the spatial distribution of non‐indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extentNature, 37
G.R. Walther, E. Post, P. Convey, 1 Menze, C. Parmesan, T.J.C. Beebee, J.M. Fromentin, O. Hoegh‐Guldberg, F. Bairlein (2002)
Ecological responses to recent climate change, 416
J.H. Brown, G.C. Stevens, D.M. Kaufman (1996)
The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structureBioscience, 27
J. Jalas, J. Suominen (1973)
Atlas Flora Europaeae: distribution of vascular plants in EuropeNew Phytologist
P.M. Berry, D. Vanhinsberg, H.A. Viles, P.A. Harrison, R.G. Pearson, R. Fuller, N. Butt, F. Miller (2001)
Climate change and nature conservation in Britain and Ireland: modelling natural resourse responses to climate change (the MONARCH Project)Annual Review Ecological Systematics
A.J. Davis, J.L. Lawton, B. Shorrocks, L.S. Jenkinson (1998b)
Individualistic species responses invalidate simple physiological models of community dynamics under global environmental changeTrends in Ecology Evolution, 67
A. Haxeltine, I.C. Prentice (1996)
BIOME3: An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysical constraints, resourse availability, and competition among plant functional typesJournal of Biogeography, 10
R. Hengeveld (1990)
Dynamic biogeographyCold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology
A.T. Peterson, J. Soberon, V. Sanchez‐Cordero (1999)
Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary timeGlobal Ecology Biogeography Letters, 285
Beerling (1995)
Climate and the distribution of Fallopia japonica: use of an introduced species to test the predictive capacity of response surfacesJournal of Vegetation Science, 6
Austin (1990)
Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus speciesEcological Monographs, 60
L. Hughes (2000)
Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent?Oikos, 15
A.J. Davis, L.S. Jenkinson, J.L. Lawton, B. Shorrocks, S. Wood (1998a)
Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warmingProgress in Physical Geography, 391
W.C. Johnson, T. Webb (1989)
The role of blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) in the postglacial dispersal of fagaceous trees in eastern North AmericaLa foret privée — revue forèire Européenne, 16
Y.C. Collingham, M.O. Hill, B. Huntley (1996)
The migration of sessile organisms: a simulation model with measurable parametersEcology, 7
P.D. Carey (1996)
DISPERSE: a cellular automaton for predicting the distribution of species in a changed climateEcological Applications, 5
R.W. Graham, E.C. Grimm (1990)
Effects of global climate change on the patterns of terrestrial biological communitiesAmerican Naturalist, 5
R.G. Pearson, T.P. Dawson, P.M. Berry, P.A. Harrison (2002)
SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of speciesScience, 154
K.J. Willis, R.J. Whittaker (2002)
Species diversity — scale matters, 295
E.O. Box (1981)
Macroclimate and plant forms: an introduction to predictive modelling in phytogeographyAmerican Journal of Botany
B. Huntley (1999)
Ecosystem management: questions for science and societyBiological Conservation
F.I. Woodward (1990)
The impact of low temperatures in controlling the geographical distribution of plants, 326
B. Huntley, H.J.B. Birks (1983)
An atlas of past and present pollen maps for Europe: 0–13 000 B.PEcological Modelling
J.L. Lawton (2000)
Ecological consequences of heterogeneityNature
A.T. Peterson, M.A. Ortega‐Huerta, J. Bartley, V. Sanchez‐Cordero, J. Soberon, R.W. Buddemeier (2002)
Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenariosPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 416
M. Hulme, G.J. Jenkins (1998)
Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom: scientific reportEcology
M.J. Crawley (1997)
Plant ecologyScience
Bakkenes (2002)
Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050Global Change Biology, 8
M.T. Sykes, I.C. Prentice, B. Smith, W. Cramer, S. Venevsky (2001)
An introduction to the European Terrestrial Ecosystem Modelling Activity, 10
M.G. Turner, R.H. Gardner, R.V. O'Neill (2001)
Landscape Ecology: in Theory and Practice
J. Wu, O.L. Loucks (1995)
From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology, 70
J.P. McCarty (2001)
Ecological consequences of recent climate changeNature, 15
A. Guisan, N.E. Zimmermann (2000)
Predictive habitat distribution models in ecologyTrends in Ecology and Evolution, 135
F.I. Woodward (1987)
Climate and plant distribution
B. Huntley, P.M. Berry, W. Cramer, A.P. Mcdonald (1995)
Modelling present and potential future ranges of some European higher plants using climate response surfacesGlobal Ecology and Biogeography, 22
R.N. Mack (1996)
Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approachesNature, 78
Berry (2002)
Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and IrelandGlobal Ecology and Biogeography, 11
Y.C. Collingham, B. Huntley (2000)
Impacts of habitat fragmentation and patch size upon migration ratesGlobal Change Biology, 10
I.C. Prentice, A.M. Solomon (1991)
Global changes of the past
J.A. Silander, J. Antonovics (1982)
Analysis of interspecific interactions in a coastal plant community — a perturbation approach, 298
F.I. Woodward, D.J. Beerling (1997)
The dynamics of vegetation change: health warnings for equilibrium ‘dodo’ models, 6
M.B. Davis, R.G. Shaw (2001)
Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate changeEcological Modelling, 292
J. Franklin (1995)
Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradientsGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 19
R.H. MacArthur (1972)
Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of speciesGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
I.C. Prentice, W. Cramer, S.P. Harrison, R. Leemans, R.A. Monserud, A.M. Solomon (1992)
A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate, 19
J.H. Brown, M.V. Lomolino (1998)
BiogeographyGlobal Ecology and Biogeography Letter
Modelling strategies for predicting the potential impacts of climate change on the natural distribution of species have often focused on the characterization of a species’ bioclimate envelope. A number of recent critiques have questioned the validity of this approach by pointing to the many factors other than climate that play an important part in determining species distributions and the dynamics of distribution changes. Such factors include biotic interactions, evolutionary change and dispersal ability. This paper reviews and evaluates criticisms of bioclimate envelope models and discusses the implications of these criticisms for the different modelling strategies employed. It is proposed that, although the complexity of the natural system presents fundamental limits to predictive modelling, the bioclimate envelope approach can provide a useful first approximation as to the potentially dramatic impact of climate change on biodiversity. However, it is stressed that the spatial scale at which these models are applied is of fundamental importance, and that model results should not be interpreted without due consideration of the limitations involved. A hierarchical modelling framework is proposed through which some of these limitations can be addressed within a broader, scale‐dependent context.
Global Ecology and Biogeography – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2003
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.