Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1993)
Oplaeg til forvaltningsplan for Danmarks padder og krybdyr
J. Prendergast, R. Quinn, J. Lawton (1999)
The Gaps between Theory and Practice in Selecting Nature ReservesConservation Biology, 13
F. D.P, P. Walker (1996)
How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas?: on hotspots, complementarity and pattern-based approaches, 3
Magne Sætersdal, J. Line, H. Birks (1993)
How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: Vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, western NorwayBiological Conservation, 66
I. Oliver, A. Beattie (1996)
Designing a Cost‐Effective Invertebrate Survey: A Test of Methods for Rapid Assessment of BiodiversityEcological Applications, 6
A. Lombard (1995)
The problems with multi-species conservation: do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide?South African Journal of Zoology, 30
John Curnutt, J. Lockwood, H. Luh, P. Nott, G. Russell (1994)
Hotspots and species diversityNature, 367
M. Soulé, M. Sanjayan (1998)
ECOLOGY: Conservation Targets: Do They Help?Science, 279
J. B. Kirkpatrick (1983)
An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from TasmaniaEnt. Meddr., 25
B. Reyers, A. S. Jaarsveld, M. Krüger (2000)
Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategyAnim. Conserv., 267
M. B. Grell (1998)
Fuglenes DanmarkBiodiv. Conserv.
R. Pressey, A. Nicholls (1989)
Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approachesBiological Conservation, 50
R. Pressey, H. Possingham, C. Margules (1996)
Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much?Biological Conservation, 76
M. A. McGeoch (1998)
The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicatorsEcol. Applic., 73
J. Kirkpatrick (1983)
An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: An example from TasmaniaBiological Conservation, 25
I. Oliver, A. J. Beattie (1996)
Designing a cost‐effective invertebrate survey: a test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversityTrends Ecol. Evol., 6
(1998)
Key sites for conservation: area-selection methods for biodiversity In Conservation in a changing world: 221–249
W. V. Reid (1998)
Biodiversity hotspotsBiol. Conserv., 13
M. E. Soulé, M. A. Sanjayan (1998)
Conservation targets: do they help, 279
C. Margules, A. Nicholls, R. Pressey (1988)
Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversityBiological Conservation, 43
D. L. Pearson, F. Cassola (1992)
World‐wide species richness patterns of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): indicator taxon for biodiversity and conservation studiesBiol. Conserv., 6
M. Sætersdal, J. M. Line, H. J. B. Birks (1993)
How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, western NorwayConserv. Biol., 66
Robert May (1988)
How Many Species Are There on Earth?Science, 241
(1999)
The dimensions of life on Earth
J. R. Prendergast, R. M. Quinn, J. H. Lawton (1999)
The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reservesProc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 13
(1999)
WORLDMAP 4 WINDOWS: software and help document 4
R. M. May (1999)
Nature and human society: the quest for a sustainable worldConserv. Biol.
A. Balmford, A. Long (1995)
Across‐Country Analyses of Biodiversity Congruence and Current Conservation Effort in the TropicsConservation Biology, 9
P. Hopkinson, J. Travis, Julianne Evans, R. Gregory, M. Telfer, P. Williams (2001)
Flexibility and the use of indicator taxa in the selection of sites for nature reservesBiodiversity & Conservation, 10
(1998)
Rødliste 1997 over planter og dyr i Danmark. Miljø- og Energiministreriet, Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser og Skov- og Naturstyrelsen
B. Reyers, A. Jaarsveld, M. Krüger (2000)
Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategyProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267
C. Bibby (1992)
Putting Biodiversity on the Map: Priority Areas for Global Conservation
C. Moritz, K. Richardson, S. Ferrier, G. Monteith, J. Stanisic, Stephen Williams, T. Whiffin (2001)
Biogeographical concordance and efficiency of taxon indicators for establishing conservation priority in a tropical rainforest biotaProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268
Paul Williams (1998)
Biodiversity indicators: graphical techniques, smoothing and searching for what makes relationships workEcography, 21
R. Pressey, C. Humphries, C. Margules, R. Vane-Wright, P. Williams (1993)
Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection.Trends in ecology & evolution, 8 4
R. L. Pressey, C. J. Humphries, C. R. Margules, R. I. Vane‐Wright, P. H. Williams (1993)
Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selectionBiol. Conserv., 8
(1994)
An annotated atlas of the Danish butterflies
P. Williams, D. Gibbons, C. Margules, A. Rebelo, C. Humphries, R. Pressey (1996)
A Comparison of Richness Hotspots, Rarity Hotspots, and Complementary Areas for Conserving Diversity of British BirdsConservation Biology, 10
(1999)
Natur og Miljø 1998 – udvalgte indikatorer. Copenhagen: Miljø- og Energiministeriet
A. Jaarsveld, Stefanie Freitag, S. Chown, Caron Muller, Stephanie Koch, H. Hull, Chuck Bellamy, Martin Krüger, Sebastian Endrödy-Younga, M. Mansell, Clarke Scholtz (1998)
Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategiesScience, 279 5359
K. J. Gaston (1996)
Biodiversity ‐ congruenceBiodiv. Conserv., 20
R. Church, D. Stoms, F. Davis (1996)
Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problemBiological Conservation, 76
D. Pearson, F. Cassola (1992)
World‐Wide Species Richness Patterns of Tiger Beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): Indicator Taxon for Biodiversity and Conservation StudiesConservation Biology, 6
P. Williams, N. Burgess, C. Rahbek (2000)
Flagship species, ecological complementarity and conserving the diversity of mammals and birds in sub‐Saharan AfricaAnimal Conservation, 3
(2001)
Danish bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): atlas and analysis of distribution, occurrence and abundance
(1984)
Biostatistical analysis
C. Flather, K. Wilson, D. Dean, W. Mccomb (1997)
IDENTIFYING GAPS IN CONSERVATION NETWORKS: OF INDICATORS AND UNCERTAINTY IN GEOGRAPHIC-BASED ANALYSESEcological Applications, 7
(1993)
Measuring more of biodiversity for choosing conservation areas, using taxonomic relatedness In International symposium on biodiversity and conservation: 194–227
S. Kaaber (1982)
Dansk fau‐nistisk bibliotek 3Biol. Rev.
Kevin Gaston (1996)
Biodiversity - congruenceProgress in Physical Geography, 20
M. Kershaw, P. Williams, G. Mace (1994)
Conservation of Afrotropical antelopes: consequences and efficiency of using different site selection methods and diversity criteriaBiodiversity & Conservation, 3
D. Pearson, S. Carroll (1999)
The influence of spatial scale on cross‐taxon congruence patterns and prediction accuracy of species richnessJournal of Biogeography, 26
(1989)
Click beetles (Coleoptera, Elateridae) from old deciduous forests in Denmark
R. Ryti (1992)
Effect of the Focal Taxon on the Selection of Nature Reserves.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2 4
J. Prendergast, B. Eversham (1997)
Species richness covariance in higher taxa: empirical tests of the biodiversity indicator conceptEcography, 20
J. Lawton, D. Bignell, B. Bolton, G. Bloemers, G. Bloemers, G. Bloemers, P. Eggleton, P. Hammond, M. Hodda, M. Hodda, R. Holt, T. Larsen, N. Mawdsley, N. Mawdsley, N. Mawdsley, N. Stork, N. Stork, D. Srivastava, D. Srivastava, A. Watt (1998)
Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forestNature, 391
A. Dobson, J. Rodríguez, W. Roberts, D. Wilcove (1997)
Geographic Distribution of Endangered Species in the United StatesScience, 275
Robert Colwell, J. Coddington (1994)
Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 345 1311
J. Prendergast, Rachel Quinn, John Lawton, B. Eversham, David Gibbons (1993)
Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategiesNature, 365
D. L. Pearson, S. S. Carroll (1999)
The influence of spatial scale on cross‐taxon congruence patterns and prediction accuracy of species richnessBiol. Conserv., 26
R. Vane-Wright, C. Humphries, Paul Williams (1991)
What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choiceBiological Conservation, 55
P. Howard, P. Viskanic, T. Davenport, F. Kigenyi, M. Baltzer, C. Dickinson, J. Lwanga, R. Matthews, A. Balmford (1998)
Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in UgandaNature, 394
C. R. Margules, A. O. Nicholls, R. L. Pressey (1988)
Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversityJ. Biogeogr., 43
R. R. Sokal, F. J. Rohlf (1995)
Biometry
A. T. Lombard (1995)
The problem with multi‐species conservation: do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincideProc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 30
(1982)
De danske svaermere og spindere
F. D.P, P. Walker (1996)
Integrating conservation and development: effective trade-offs between biodiversity and cost in the selection of protected areasBiodiversity & Conservation, 5
L. Glowka, F. Burhenne-Guilmin, H. Synge (1994)
A guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity
(1998)
Fuglenes Danmark. Viborg: G. E. C. Gads Forlag and Danish Ornithological Society
D. Stroud, M. Usher (1986)
Wildlife Conservation EvaluationJournal of Range Management, 41
B. Csuti, S. Polasky, P. Williams, R. Pressey, J. Camm, M. Kershaw, A. Kiester, Brian Downs, Richard Hamilton, M. Huso, K. Sahr (1997)
A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in OregonBiological Conservation, 80
A. Balmford (1998)
On hotspots and the use of indicators for reserve selection.Trends in ecology & evolution, 13 10
Amy Ando, J. Camm, S. Polasky, A. Solow (1998)
Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservationScience, 279 5359
Identification of reliable surrogate indicator taxa and effective shortcuts for the preservation of overall biodiversity is a major challenge. Encouragingly, complementarity‐derived priority sets of focal taxa were found highly effective in representing non‐target taxa in a study from Ugandan forests. It has been proposed cross‐taxon congruence in complementarity is less distinct in temperate regions than in the tropics, because temperate regions have fewer species, and hence focal taxa may be less effective as they are less diverse. To test this, we used all available atlas data (10 × 10 km scale) in Denmark (butterflies, birds, amphibians, reptiles, large moths, bats and click beetles, n= 434 species), and looked at whether conservation priority areas based on one taxonomic group represent species richness of other groups in a highly fragmented landscape. We apply a new approach (based on G‐statistics) that enables statistical evaluation of cross‐taxon congruence in complementarity‐derived priority sets. We found indications that the same taxa represented other groups effectively and exhibited cross‐taxon congruence in complementarity‐derived priority sets. Birds performed significantly, but relatively poorly, butterflies somewhat better and bats relatively well in representing species richness of other groups. Large moths performed best and may be an overlooked predictor of diversity in other animal taxa.
Animal Conservation – Wiley
Published: May 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.