Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Schmidt, J. Hunter, N. Raju (1988)
Validity Generalization and Situational Specificity: A Second Look at the 75% Rule and Fisher's z TransformationJournal of Applied Psychology, 73
K. Scott, G. Taylor (1985)
An Examination of Conflicting Findings on the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Absenteeism: A Meta-AnalysisAcademy of Management Journal, 28
Kenneth Pearlman, F. Schmidt, J. Hunter (1980)
Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65
R. Hackett, R. Guion (1985)
A reevaluation of the absenteeism-job satisfaction relationship.Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 35 3
Glenn Mcevoy, Wayne Cascio (1987)
Do good or poor performers leave? A meta-analysis of the relationship between performance and turnover.Academy of Management Journal, 30
Spector Spector, Levine Levine (1987)
Meta‐analysis for integrating study outcomes: A Monte Carlo study of its susceptibility to Type I and Type II errorsJournal of Applied Psychology, 72
J. Rasmussen, Brian Loher (1988)
Appropriate critical percentages for the Schmidt and Hunter meta-analysis procedure: comparative evaluation of type I error rate and powerJournal of Applied Psychology, 73
H. Osburn, J. Callender, J. Greener, Steven Ashworth (1983)
Statistical power of tests of the situational specificity hypothesis in validity generalization studies: A cautionary note.Journal of Applied Psychology, 68
E. Whitener (1990)
Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75
McEvoy McEvoy, Cascio Cascio (1987)
Do poor performers leave? A meta‐analysis of the relation between performance and turnoverAcademy of Management Journal, 30
J. Mendoza, R. Reinhardt (1991)
Validity generalization procedures using sample-based estimates: A comparison of six procedures.Psychological Bulletin, 110
Schmidt Schmidt, Hunter Hunter (1977)
Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalizationJournal of Applied Psychology, 62
J. Hunter, F. Schmidt, John Rauschenberger (1977)
Fairness of psychological tests: Implications of four definitions for selection utility and minority hiring.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62
Schmidt Schmidt, Hunter Hunter, Pearlman Pearlman (1981)
Task differences and validity of aptitude tests in selection: A red herringJournal of Applied Psychology, 66
P. Sackett, Michael Harris, J. Orr (1986)
On seeking moderator variables in the meta-analysis of correlational data: A Monte Carlo investigation of statistical power and resistance to Type I error.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71
M. Petty, Gail McGee, Jerry Cavender (1984)
A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Individual Job Satisfaction and Individual PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 9
N. Raju, M. Burke, J. Normand, George Langlois (1991)
A new meta-analytic approach.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76
J. Wagner, R. Gooding (1987)
Effects of Societal Trends on Participation Research.Administrative Science Quarterly, 32
F. Schmidt, J. Hunter (1981)
Employment testing: Old theories and new research findings.American Psychologist, 36
Jeanne Carsten, Paul Spector (1987)
Unemployment, job satisfaction, and employee turnover: A meta-analytic test of the Muchinsky model.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72
G. Glass (1976)
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1Educational Researcher, 5
Lawrence Roth, P. Sackett (1991)
Development and Monte Carlo Evaluation of Meta-Analytic Estimators for Correlated DataPsychological Bulletin, 110
D. Kipnis, S. Schmidt, K. Price, C. Stitt (1981)
Why do I like thee: Is it your performance or my orders?Journal of Applied Psychology, 66
R. Gooding, J. Wagner (1985)
A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship between Size and Performance: The Productivity and Efficiency of Organizations and Their Subunits.Administrative Science Quarterly, 30
The present study evaluated accuracy levels of seven techniques for ascertaining, after a meta‐analysis, whether moderators are present or not: (a) SH‐75% rule for uncorrected r, (b) SH‐75% rule for corrected r, (c) SH‐95% rule for uncorrected r, (d) SH‐95% rule for corrected r, (e) the Q statistic; (f) inclusion of 0 in the credibility interval around the corrected r, and (g) the size of the interval. Using Monte Carlo data which were defined by various parameters including sample based artifacts, comparisons of Type I and power determinations were generated. Findings showed that when differences between population correlations were small, power levels for all techniques were relatively low. Overall, SH rules and the Q statistic had greater power but higher Type I error rate than credibility intervals. Because of the high Type I error rate associated with both of the SH‐95% techniques and the low power found with the credibility intervals, the SH‐75% rules and Q statistic are recommended. Limitations and some practical implications for the findings are discussed.
Personnel Psychology – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 1993
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.