Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Felson (1981)
Ambiguity and bias in the self-concept.Social Psychology Quarterly, 44
D. Ilgen, C. Fisher, M. Taylor (1979)
Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 64
Farh Farh, Werbel Werbel (1986)
Effects of purpose of appraisal and expectation of validation on self‐appraisal leniencyJournal of Applied Psychology, 71
P. Bentler, D. Bonett (1980)
Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance StructuresPsychological Bulletin, 88
Cronbach Cronbach, Furby Furby (1970)
How should we measure “change”‐or should wePsychological Bulletin, 74
Landy Landy, Farr Farr (1980)
Performance ratingPsychological Bulletin, 87
W. Swann, S. Read (1981)
Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptionsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17
Shelley Taylor, Jonathon Brown (1988)
Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health.Psychological bulletin, 103 2
R. Baumeister, E. Jones (1978)
When Self-Presentation is Constrained by the Target's Knowledge: Consistency and Compensation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36
J. Brockner, W. Derr, W. Laing (1987)
Self-esteem and reactions to negative feedback: Toward greater generalizabilityJournal of Research in Personality, 21
G. Thornton (1980)
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SELF-APPRAISALS OF JOB PERFORMANCEPersonnel Psychology, 33
G. Bassett, H. Meyer (1968)
Performance appraisal based on self-review.Personnel Psychology, 21
Jean-françois Hennart (1988)
Upstream vertical integration in the aluminum and tin industries : A comparative study of the choice between market and intrafirm coordinationJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 9
M. Heilman (1984)
Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination: The effects of applicant sex and information type on preliminary employment decisions☆Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33
H. Kaplan (1975)
THE SELF‐ESTEEM MOTIVE AND CHANGE IN SELF‐ATTITUDESThe Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 161
Dobbins Dobbins, Lane Lane, Steiner Steiner (1988)
A note on the role of laboratory methodology in applied behavioral research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath waterJournal of Organizational Behavior, 9
A. Greenwald (1980)
The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.American Psychologist, 35
J. Brockner (1979)
Self-esteem, self-consciousness, and task performance: Replications, extensions, and possible explanations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37
A. Korman (1970)
Toward an hypothesis of work behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 54
J. Farh, J. Werbel, A. Bedeian (1988)
AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF SELF‐APPRAISAL‐BASED PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONPersonnel Psychology, 41
B. Schlenker (1975)
Self-presentation: managing the impression of consistency when reality interferes with self-enhancement.Journal of personality and social psychology, 32 6
Michael Harris, J. Schaubroeck (1988)
A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings.Personnel Psychology, 41
S. Ungar (1980)
The Effects of the Certainty of Self-Perceptions on Self-Presentation Behaviors: A Test of the Strength of Self-Enhancement MotivesSocial Psychology Quarterly, 43
E. Higgins, T. Higgins (1987)
Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect.Psychological review, 94 3
J. Farh, G. Dobbins (1989)
Effects of comparative performance information on the accuracy of self-ratings and agreement between self- and supervisor ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74
L. Wells, P. Sweeney (1986)
A test of three models of bias in self-assessment.Social Psychology Quarterly, 49
J. Farh, J. Werbel (1986)
Effects of Purpose of the Appraisal and Expectation of Validation On Self-Appraisal LeniencyHKUST Business School Research Paper Series
This study used structural equation model analysis to examine the relationship between self‐esteem and leniency bias in self‐reports of performance. The results showed that consistent with the prediction of consistency theory (e.g., Korman, 1970), leniency bias was positively correlated with self‐esteem. The results also suggest that the relationship between self‐esteem and leniency bias was more positive when self‐ratings were made on ambiguous performance dimensions rather than on less ambiguous dimensions. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Personnel Psychology – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 1989
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.