Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Kothe, D. Regan (1990)
The Component of Gaze Selection/Control in the Development of Visual Acuity in ChildrenOptometry and Vision Science, 67
D. Levi, S. Klein (1985)
Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopiaVision Research, 25
D. Giaschi, D. Regan, S. Kraft, A. Kothe (1993)
Crowding and Contrast in AmblyopiaOptometry and Vision Science, 70
D. Regan, D. Neima (1984)
Low-contrast letter charts in early diabetic retinopathy, ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and Parkinson's disease.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 68
David Regan, David Regan, D. Neima (1983)
Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function.Ophthalmology, 90 10
U. Polat, A. Norcia (1996)
Neurophysiological Evidence for Contrast Dependent Long-range Facilitation and Suppression in the Human Visual CortexVision Research, 36
A. Kothe, D. Regan (1990)
Crowding Depends on ContrastOptometry and vision Science, 67
U. Polat, D. Sagi (1994)
Spatial interactions in human vision: from near to far via experience-dependent cascades of connections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91
U. Polat, D. Sagi, A. Norcia (1997)
Abnormal Long-range Spatial Interactions in AmblyopiaVision Research, 37
R. Hess, J. Pointer (1985)
Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopia: The distribution of the anomaly across the visual fieldVision Research, 25
A. Bradley, Ralph Freeman (1982)
Contrast sensitivity in childrenVision Research, 22
C. Schor, M. Terrell, D. Peterson (1976)
Contour Interaction and Temporal Masking in Strabismus and Amblyopia*Optometry and Vision Science, 53
D. Levi, S. Klein, A. Aitsebaomo (1985)
Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnificationVision Research, 25
J. Stuart, H. Burian (1962)
A study of separation difficulty. Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes.American journal of ophthalmology, 53
D. Regan, D. Giaschi, S. Kraft, A. Kothe (1992)
Method for identifying amblyopes whose reduced line acuity is caused by defective selection and/or control of gazeOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 12
A. Hilton, J. Stanley (1972)
Pitfalls in testing children's vision by the Sheridan Gardiner single optotype method.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 56
R. Manny, K. Fern, D. Loshin (1987)
Contour Interaction Function in the Preschool ChildOptometry and Vision Science, 64
M. Flom, F. Weymouth, Daniel Kahneman (1963)
VISUAL RESOLUTION AND CONTOUR INTERACTION.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 53
U. Polat, K. Mizobe, M. Pettet, T. Kasamatsu, A. Norcia (1998)
Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast thresholdNature, 391
U. Polat, D. Sagi (1994)
The architecture of perceptual spatial interactionsVision Research, 34
U. Polat, D. Sagi (1993)
Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experimentsVision Research, 33
M. Flom, G. Heath, E. Takahashi (1963)
Contour Interaction and Visual Resolution: Contralateral EffectsScience, 142
P. McGraw, B. Winn (1993)
Glasgow Acuity Cards: a new test for the measurement of letter acuity in childrenOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 13
Summary We investigate the influence of stimulus contrast upon contour interaction in normal and amblyopic subjects. Using a computer generated acuity task, flanked and unflanked acuities were measured psychometrically at both high contrast (80%) and low contrast (6%), in a group of 19 normal and 11 amblyopic subjects. The crowding ratio for high contrast letters was found to be significantly higher than that for low contrast letters. The extent of the crowding zone was measured at high and low contrast by varying the separation of the optotype and flanking bars. The crowding zone measurement was repeated for the high contrast optotypes using dioptric blur. The position of the flanking contours was found to have a significant effect on letter resolution at high contrast but no significant effect was demonstrable at low contrast. With the addition of dioptric blur the effect of contour interaction became negligible at high contrast. These findings support the hypothesis that the crowding effect is: (1) similar in normal and amblyopic eyes when tested at threshold; (2) is contrast dependent appearing only for high contrast optotypes.
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics – Wiley
Published: May 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.