Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Ljung, G. Box (1978)
On a measure of lack of fit in time series modelsBiometrika, 65
S. Brown, P. Laux, B. Schachter (1991)
On the Existence of an Optimal Tick SizeReview of Futures Markets, 10
W. Silber (1984)
Marketmaker Behavior in an Auction Market: An Analysis of Scalpers in Futures MarketsJournal of Finance, 39
James Ohlson, S. Penman (1985)
Volatility increases subsequent to stock splits: An empirical aberrationJournal of Financial Economics, 14
Richard Bookstaber (2000)
Understanding and Monitoring the Liquidity Crisis CycleFinancial Analysts Journal, 56
A. McLeod, W. Li (1983)
DIAGNOSTIC CHECKING ARMA TIME SERIES MODELS USING SQUARED‐RESIDUAL AUTOCORRELATIONSJournal of Time Series Analysis, 4
Richard Sandor, Howard Sosin (1980)
Inventive Activity in Futures Markets: A Case Study of the Development of the First Interest Rate Futures MarketAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62
David McDowall, R. McCleary, E. Meidinger, R. Hay (1980)
Interrupted Time Series Analysis
J. MacKinnon (1990)
Critical Values for Cointegration Tests
S. R. Thompson, M. L. Waller (1988)
The Intraday Variability of Soybean Futures Prices: Information and Trading Effects VariabilityReview of Futures Markets, 7
Thomas Smith, R. Whaley (1994)
Estimating the effective BID/ASK spread from time and sales dataJournal of Futures Markets, 14
D. Dickey, W. Fuller (1979)
Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit RootJournal of the American Statistical Association, 74
R. Huang, H. Stoll (1998)
Is It Time to Split the S&P 500 Futures Contract?Financial Analysts Journal, 54
Y. Amihud, H. Mendelson, Junko Uno (1999)
Number of Shareholders and Stock Prices: Evidence from JapanJournal of Finance, 54
F. Black (1976)
The pricing of commodity contractsJournal of Financial Economics, 3
W. Silber (1981)
Innovation, competition, and new contract design in futures marketsJournal of Futures Markets, 1
Mihir Bhattacharya (1983)
Transactions data tests of efficiency of the Chicago board options exchangeJournal of Financial Economics, 12
George Wang, Jot Yau, Tony Baptiste (1997)
Trading volume and transaction costs in futures marketsJournal of Futures Markets, 17
H. Demsetz (1968)
The Cost of TransactingQuarterly Journal of Economics, 82
J. Jordan, William Seale, Stephen Dinehart, D. Kenyon (1988)
The Intraday Variability Of Soybean Futures Prices: Information And Trading Effects
G. Box, G. Tiao (1975)
Intervention Analysis with Applications to Economic and Environmental ProblemsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 70
C. Lamoureux, Percy Poon (1987)
The Market Reaction to Stock SplitsJournal of Finance, 42
Richard Sandor (1973)
Innovation by an Exchange: A Case Study of the Development of the Plywood Futures ContractThe Journal of Law and Economics, 16
M. Parkinson (1980)
The Extreme Value Method for Estimating the Variance of the Rate of ReturnThe Journal of Business, 53
L. Harris (1991)
Stock Price Clustering and DiscretenessReview of Financial Studies, 4
G. Box, G. Tiao (1965)
A CHANGE IN LEVEL OF A NON-STATIONARY TIME SERIES.Biometrika, 52
T. Mills (1990)
Time series techniques for economists
T. Copeland (1979)
Liquidity Changes Following Stock SplitsJournal of Finance, 34
Ahmet Karagozoglu, Terrence Martell (1999)
Changing the Size of a Futures Contract: Liquidity and Microstructure EffectsThe Financial Review, 34
The Chicago Mercantile Exchange reduced the size of its S&P 500 futures contract when it reduced the multiplier from 500 to 250 and increased the minimum tick from 0.05 to 0.10 on November 3, 1997. This is a rare major change in a very successful contract's specifications. We analyze effects of this change on liquidity and market dynamics in both a univariate and a multivariate context. The main contribution of this study is the use of multiple intervention analysis with various dynamic response functions to examine the effects of the split while taking into account several other major market events surrounding it. A multivariate analysis is also used to test the impact of the split using a structural model of liquidity and market dynamics. Empirical findings offer limited support for the hypotheses that smaller contract size resulted in smoother trading, and that more public customers trade the S&P 500 futures contract following its split. We observe a reduction in the average transaction size as well as a temporary narrowing of the bid-ask spreads, but no significant change in volatility that can be attributed to the split. We do not find any significant and lasting impact on other liquidity and market variables.
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 4, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.