Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. DeJoy (1992)
An examination of gender differences in traffic accident risk perception.Accident; analysis and prevention, 24 3
P. Slovic (1987)
Perception of risk.Science, 236 4799
T. Webler, S. Tuler (2000)
Fairness and Competence in Citizen ParticipationAdministration & Society, 32
(1993)
A Test of the Facility Siting Credo,’’ Risk Anal
D. MacGregor, P. Slovic, M. Morgan (1994)
Perception of Risks from Electromagnetic Fields: A Psychometric Evaluation of a Risk-Communication Approach
(1996)
Health, Safety Environ
(1984)
Hope, ‘‘Defining Risk,’
B. Cohen (1985)
Criteria for Technology Acceptability1Risk Analysis, 5
(1988)
Fear of technological hazards: One concern or many
P. Slovic, T. Malmfors, C. Mertz, N. Neil, I. Purchase (1997)
Evaluating chemical risks: results of a survey of the British Toxicology SocietyHuman & Experimental Toxicology, 16
SBR 94-122754. An earlier version of this text appeared in
Paul Slovic, Nancy Kraus, H. Lappe, M. Major (1991)
Risk perception of prescription drugs: report on a survey in Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 82 3
T. Tengs, Miriam Adams, J. Pliskin, J. Pliskin, D. Safran, J. Siegel, M. Weinstein, John Graham (1995)
Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 15 3
Gideon Koren, N. Klein (1991)
Bias against negative studies in newspaper reports of medical research.JAMA, 266 13
K. Shrader-Frechette (1991)
Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms
(1993)
Valueorientations, gender, and environmental concerns
(1988)
American Scientist
R. Gregory, S. Lichtenstein, D. MacGregor (1993)
The Role of Past States in Determining Reference Points for Policy DecisionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55
L. Nanstad, C. Travis (1993)
Siting low-level radioactive waste disposal facilitiesJournal of Hazardous Materials, 34
(1987)
Office of Policy Analysis., Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems
C. Gilligan (1982)
In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982.
(1987)
Factors Influencing What is Heard and Accepted,’’ Sci
C. Merchant (1980)
The Death of Nature
C. Merchant (1982)
The death of nature : women, ecology, and the scientific revolutionTechnology and Culture, 23
(1995)
The varieties ofrisk [Environmental Risk Management Working Paper ERC 95-3
(1982)
On the eliritation
H. Kunreuther, K. Fitzgerald, Thomas Aarts (1993)
Siting noxious facilities: A test of the Facility Siting CredoRisk Analysis, 13
P. Slovic (1999)
Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment BattlefieldRisk Analysis, 19
E. Peters, P. Slovic (1996)
The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26
Emotion, Sex, Politics, & Science c:\authors_pan\paul\trust1.doc, 08/06
(1994)
A Psychometric Evalua tion of a Risk-Communication Approach,’’ Risk Anal
(1991)
Citizen participation for hazard management
P. Slovic (1993)
Perceived risk, trust, and democracyRisk Analysis, 13
R. Keeney, D. Winterfeldt (1986)
Improving risk communication.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 6 4
Baumer Baumer (1978)
Research on Fear of Crime in the United StatesVictimology, 3
(1995)
Risk and Social Learning: Reification to Engage-15
M. Morgan, V. Covello, W. Glamm, J. Rodricks, R. Tardiff (1983)
The Analysis of Actual Versus Perceived RisksJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 3
F. Berkhout (1991)
Nuclear politics: energy and the state in the United States, Sweden, and FranceInternational Affairs, 67
Patricia Gwartney-Gibbs, D. Lach (1991)
Sex Differences in Attitudes toward Nuclear WarJournal of Peace Research, 28
Denise Scheberle (1995)
Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation . Stephen Breyer Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993, 160 pp. US$22.95 cloth. ISBN 0-674-08114-5. Harvard University Press, 79 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.Politics and the Life Sciences, 14
Karl Dake (1991)
Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of RiskJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22
J. Lichtenberg, D. Maclean (1992)
Is Good News No News?The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 17
(1987)
How a PR firm executed the alar scare Providing risk information in communities : Factors influencing what is heard and accepted
(1983)
Webster’s New Twentieth Century Dictionary
A. Alhakami, P. Slovic (1994)
A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 14 6
D. Buss, K. Craik, Karl Dake (1986)
Contemporary Worldviews and Perception of the Technological System
P. Slovic, E. Peters (1998)
The importance of worldviews in risk perceptionRisk Decision and Policy, 3
H. Longino (1981)
The Death Of Nature: Women, Ecology, And The Scientific RevolutionEnvironmental Ethics, 3
J. Flynn, P. Slovic, C. Mertz (1994)
Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 14 6
N. Neil, T. Malmfors, P. Slovic (1992)
Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical RisksToxicologic Pathology, 22
M. Steger, Stephanie Witt (1989)
Gender Differences in Environmental Orientations: a Comparison of Publics and Activists in Canada and the U.SPolitical Research Quarterly, 42
S. Funtowicz, J. Ravetz (1992)
Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science
S. Krimsky, D. Golding (1992)
Social Theories of Risk
Steger Steger, Witt Witt (1989)
Gender Differences in Environmental Orientations: A Comparison of Publics and Activists in Canada and the U.SWest. Polit. Quart., 42
Melissa Finucane, A. Alhakami, P. Slovic, Stephen Johnson (2000)
The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefitsJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13
(1980)
Nuclear Phobia: Phobic Thinking
C. Gilligan (2009)
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development, 2
(1987)
Agency (USEPA)
Fischhoff Fischhoff, Watson Watson, Hope Hope (1984)
Defining RiskPolicy Sciences, 17
M. Morgan, P. Slovic, I. Nair, D. Geisler, D. MacGregor, Baruch Fischhoff, D. Lincoln, K. Florig (1985)
Powerline frequency electric and magnetic fields: a pilot study of risk perception.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 5 2
J. Gutteling, O. Wiegman (1993)
Gender-specific reactions to environmental hazards in the NetherlandsSex Roles, 28
R. Barke, H. Jenkins‐Smith, P. Slovic (1997)
Risk perceptions of men and women scientistsSocial Science Quarterly, 78
Ortwin Renn, T. Webler, B. Johnson (1991)
Public Participation in Hazard Management: The Use of Citizen Panels in the U.S., 2
(1971)
Attitudes toward risk
H. Wetzler (1983)
Risk /Benefit AnalysisJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 25
(1995)
Technological Stigma
P. Slovic (1992)
Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm
J. Alper (1993)
The Pipeline Is Leaking Women All the Way AlongScience, 260
P. Slovic, Nancy Kraus, H. Lappe, H. Letzel, T. Malmfors (1989)
Risk Perception of Prescription Drugs: Report on a Survey in SwedenCanadian Journal of Public Health-revue Canadienne De Sante Publique, 82
P. Thompson, W. Dean (1996)
Competing Conceptions of Risk, 7
Fessenden‐Raden Fessenden‐Raden, Fitchen Fitchen, Heath Heath (1987)
Providing Risk Information in Communities: Factors Influencing What is Heard and AcceptedSci. Technol. Hum. Values, 12
Dake Dake (1991)
Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of Risk: An Analysis of Contemporary Worldviews and Cultural BiasesJ. Cross-Cult. Psychol., 22
Kraus Kraus, Malmfors Malmfors, Slovic Slovic (1992)
Intuitive Toxicology: Expertand Lay Judgments of Chemical RisksRisk Anal., 12
Environment, ethics, and behavior
Baruch Fischhoff, P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, Barbara Combs (1978)
How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefitsPolicy Sciences, 9
(1993)
Jenkins-Smith, Nuclear Imagery and Regional Stigma: Testing Hypotheses of Image Acquisition and Valuation Regarding Nevada
Karl Dake (1992)
Myths of Nature: Culture and the Social Construction of RiskJournal of Social Issues, 48
Fenton Fenton (October 3, 1989)
How a PR Firm Executed the Alar ScareWall Street J., A22
(1992)
Reification to Engage15,369-390 (1995)
E. Rosa, J. Jasper (1991)
Nuclear Politics: Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden, and France.Contemporary Sociology, 20
C. Brody (1984)
Differences by Sex in Support for Nuclear PowerSocial Forces, 63
(1992)
Public Wisdom, Expert Fallibility: Toward a Contextual Theory of Risk,
(1993)
Comment on Sheila Jasanoffs guest editorial
P. Slovic, J. Flynn, Mark Layman (1991)
Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear WasteScience, 254
(1978)
Women's Fear of Crime: From Blaming to Restricting the Victim
P. Slovic, Mark Layman, Nancy Kraus, J. Flynn, James Chalmers, Gail Gesell (1991)
Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 11 4
Nicolai Bodemer, Wolfgang Gaissmaier (1993)
Risk perceptionNature, 361
(1995)
The Comprehensive Regulatory Reform Act of 1995
M. English (1992)
Siting Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities: The Public Policy Dilemma
B. Cohen (1985)
Criteria for technology acceptability.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 5 1
M. Morris (1997)
Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic SocietyJournal of Radiological Protection, 17
(1985)
A Pilot Study of Risk Perception,’’ Risk Anal
Risk management has become increasingly politicized and contentious. Polarized views, controversy, and conflict have become pervasive. Research has begun to provide a new perspective on this problem by demonstrating the complexity of the concept “risk” and the inadequacies of the traditionalview of risk assessment as a purely scientific enterprise. This paper argues that danger is real, but risk is socially constructed. Risk assessment is inherently subjective and represents a blending of science and judgmentwith important psychological, social, cultural, and political factors. In addition, our social and democratic institutions, remarkable as they are in many respects, breed distrust in the risk arena. Whoever controls the definition of risk controls the rational solution to the problem at hand. Ifrisk is defined one way, then one option will rise to the top as the most cost‐effective or the safest or the best. If it is defined another way, perhaps incorporating qualitative characteristics and other contextual factors, one will likely get a different ordering of action solutions. Definingrisk is thus an exercise in power. Scientific literacy and public education are important, but they are not central to risk controversies. The public is not irrational. Their judgments about risk are influenced by emotion and affect in a way that is both simple and sophisticated. The same holds true for scientists. Public views are also influenced by worldviews, ideologies, and values; so are scientists' views, particularly when they are working at the limits of their expertise. The limitations of risk science, the importance and difficulty of maintaining trust, and the complex, sociopolitical nature of risk point to the need for a new approach‐one that focuses upon introducing more public participation into both risk assessment and risk decision making in order to make the decision process more democratic, improve the relevance and quality of technical analysis, and increasethe legitimacy and public acceptance of the resulting decisions.
Risk Analysis – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.